Temporal Trends in Noninvasive and Invasive Cardiac Testing From 2010 to 2022 in the US Medicare Population.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.124.017567
Yosef A Cohen, Luca Bremner, Mrinali Shetty, Michelle Castillo, Julia Susan Cappell, Jay S Leb, Lynne L Johnson, Andrew J Einstein
{"title":"Temporal Trends in Noninvasive and Invasive Cardiac Testing From 2010 to 2022 in the US Medicare Population.","authors":"Yosef A Cohen, Luca Bremner, Mrinali Shetty, Michelle Castillo, Julia Susan Cappell, Jay S Leb, Lynne L Johnson, Andrew J Einstein","doi":"10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.124.017567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac diagnostic testing continues to evolve, and controversies remain regarding the optimal utilization of different procedures. We sought to evaluate changes in long-term utilization trends for a wide range of cardiac diagnostic tests in the context of advancing technologies and updated guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Annual cardiac testing volumes from 2010 to 2022 in the Medicare Part B population were compared across tests and by provider specialty and analyzed using Joinpoint regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most-utilized test in the Medicare population remained transthoracic echocardiography, accounting for 61.5% of cardiac testing use in 2011 and 67.7% in 2022, followed by single-photon emission computed tomography (CT) myocardial perfusion imaging, which decreased from 20.8% to 12.9%. Single-photon emission CT myocardial perfusion imaging use decreased relative to positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (ratio of 39:1 in 2011 to 7:1 in 2022), stress cardiac magnetic resonance (1179:1 in 2011, 268:1 in 2022), and coronary CT angiography (61:1 in 2011, 10:1 in 2022). Decreased use was also observed for exercise treadmill testing (2.3% to 1.7%), stress echocardiography (3.6% to 2.6%), multigated acquisition (0.4% to 0.1%), and invasive coronary angiography (8.0% to 7.0%). The use of fractional flow reserve by CT per 100 000 Medicare enrollees increased by >16-fold from 2018 (the first year covered) to 2022, and cardiac amyloidosis pyrophosphate scintigraphy studies increased 4-fold from 2011 to 2022 (0.17% to 0.68%). Positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging volumes have surpassed exercise treadmill test volumes and, assuming the current rate of change continues, are projected to surpass stress echocardiography volumes in 2024. Coronary CT angiography is projected to overtake exercise treadmill testing in 2024 and stress echocardiography in 2025.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Between 2010 and 2022, cardiac diagnostic testing in the US Medicare population shifted from invasive angiography and traditional stress testing toward an increase in cardiac CT, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography. Pyrophosphate scintigraphy studies also increased, as did fractional flow reserve by CT since its introduction. Changes in preferred diagnostic modalities suggest a need to reevaluate current recommendations for training in cardiovascular medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":10202,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"e017567"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.124.017567","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac diagnostic testing continues to evolve, and controversies remain regarding the optimal utilization of different procedures. We sought to evaluate changes in long-term utilization trends for a wide range of cardiac diagnostic tests in the context of advancing technologies and updated guidelines.

Methods: Annual cardiac testing volumes from 2010 to 2022 in the Medicare Part B population were compared across tests and by provider specialty and analyzed using Joinpoint regression.

Results: The most-utilized test in the Medicare population remained transthoracic echocardiography, accounting for 61.5% of cardiac testing use in 2011 and 67.7% in 2022, followed by single-photon emission computed tomography (CT) myocardial perfusion imaging, which decreased from 20.8% to 12.9%. Single-photon emission CT myocardial perfusion imaging use decreased relative to positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (ratio of 39:1 in 2011 to 7:1 in 2022), stress cardiac magnetic resonance (1179:1 in 2011, 268:1 in 2022), and coronary CT angiography (61:1 in 2011, 10:1 in 2022). Decreased use was also observed for exercise treadmill testing (2.3% to 1.7%), stress echocardiography (3.6% to 2.6%), multigated acquisition (0.4% to 0.1%), and invasive coronary angiography (8.0% to 7.0%). The use of fractional flow reserve by CT per 100 000 Medicare enrollees increased by >16-fold from 2018 (the first year covered) to 2022, and cardiac amyloidosis pyrophosphate scintigraphy studies increased 4-fold from 2011 to 2022 (0.17% to 0.68%). Positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging volumes have surpassed exercise treadmill test volumes and, assuming the current rate of change continues, are projected to surpass stress echocardiography volumes in 2024. Coronary CT angiography is projected to overtake exercise treadmill testing in 2024 and stress echocardiography in 2025.

Conclusions: Between 2010 and 2022, cardiac diagnostic testing in the US Medicare population shifted from invasive angiography and traditional stress testing toward an increase in cardiac CT, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography. Pyrophosphate scintigraphy studies also increased, as did fractional flow reserve by CT since its introduction. Changes in preferred diagnostic modalities suggest a need to reevaluate current recommendations for training in cardiovascular medicine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
225
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, an American Heart Association journal, publishes high-quality, patient-centric articles focusing on observational studies, clinical trials, and advances in applied (translational) research. The journal features innovative, multimodality approaches to the diagnosis and risk stratification of cardiovascular disease. Modalities covered include echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy, magnetic resonance angiography, cardiac positron emission tomography, noninvasive assessment of vascular and endothelial function, radionuclide imaging, molecular imaging, and others. Article types considered by Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging include Original Research, Research Letters, Advances in Cardiovascular Imaging, Clinical Implications of Molecular Imaging Research, How to Use Imaging, Translating Novel Imaging Technologies into Clinical Applications, and Cardiovascular Images.
期刊最新文献
Differences in Pulmonary Artery Stiffness Measured by CMR in Preterm-Born Young Adults With and Without Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia. Temporal Trends in Noninvasive and Invasive Cardiac Testing From 2010 to 2022 in the US Medicare Population. Endomyocardial Fibrosis Mimicking a Heart Tumor and Dysplastic Tricuspid Valve in a Teenager: A Rare Cardiac Manifestation of Behçet Disease. Recurrent Cryptogenic Ischemic Strokes in a Young Female Patient: A Case of a Bilateral Carotid Web. Echocardiographic Characterization of Myocardial Stiffness in Healthy Volunteers, Cardiac Amyloidosis, and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Case-Control Study Using Multimodality Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1