Comparative Study of AI Modes in Ultrasound Diagnosis of Breast Lesions.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Diagnostics Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15050560
Yu-Ting Hong, Zi-Han Yu, Chen-Pin Chou
{"title":"Comparative Study of AI Modes in Ultrasound Diagnosis of Breast Lesions.","authors":"Yu-Ting Hong, Zi-Han Yu, Chen-Pin Chou","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15050560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the S-Detect ultrasound system's three selectable AI modes-high-sensitivity (HSe), high-accuracy (HAc), and high-specificity (HSp)-for breast lesion diagnosis, comparing their performance in a clinical setting. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective analysis evaluated 260 breast lesions from ultrasound images of 232 women (mean age: 50.2 years) using the S-Detect system. Each lesion was analyzed under the HSe, HAc, and HSp modes. The study employed ROC curve analysis to comprehensively compare the diagnostic performance of the AI modes against radiologist diagnoses. Subgroup analyses focused on the age (<45, 45-55, >55 years) and lesion size (<1 cm, 1-2 cm, >2 cm). <b>Results:</b> Among the 260 lesions, 73% were identified as benign and 27% as malignant. Radiologists achieved a sensitivity of 98.6%, specificity of 64.2%, and accuracy of 73.5%. The HSe mode exhibited the highest sensitivity at 95.7%. The HAc mode excelled with the highest accuracy (86.2%) and positive predictive value (71.3%), while the HSp mode had the highest specificity at 95.8%. In the age-based subgroup analyses, the HAc mode consistently showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) across all categories. The HSe mode achieved the highest AUC (0.726) for lesions smaller than 1 cm. In the case of lesions sized 1-2 cm and larger than 2 cm, the HAc mode showed the highest AUCs of 0.906 and 0.776, respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> The S-Detect HSe mode matches radiologists' performance. Alternative modes provide sensitivity and specificity adjustments. The patient age and lesion size influence the diagnostic performance across all S-Detect modes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11898511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15050560","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the S-Detect ultrasound system's three selectable AI modes-high-sensitivity (HSe), high-accuracy (HAc), and high-specificity (HSp)-for breast lesion diagnosis, comparing their performance in a clinical setting. Methods: This retrospective analysis evaluated 260 breast lesions from ultrasound images of 232 women (mean age: 50.2 years) using the S-Detect system. Each lesion was analyzed under the HSe, HAc, and HSp modes. The study employed ROC curve analysis to comprehensively compare the diagnostic performance of the AI modes against radiologist diagnoses. Subgroup analyses focused on the age (<45, 45-55, >55 years) and lesion size (<1 cm, 1-2 cm, >2 cm). Results: Among the 260 lesions, 73% were identified as benign and 27% as malignant. Radiologists achieved a sensitivity of 98.6%, specificity of 64.2%, and accuracy of 73.5%. The HSe mode exhibited the highest sensitivity at 95.7%. The HAc mode excelled with the highest accuracy (86.2%) and positive predictive value (71.3%), while the HSp mode had the highest specificity at 95.8%. In the age-based subgroup analyses, the HAc mode consistently showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) across all categories. The HSe mode achieved the highest AUC (0.726) for lesions smaller than 1 cm. In the case of lesions sized 1-2 cm and larger than 2 cm, the HAc mode showed the highest AUCs of 0.906 and 0.776, respectively. Conclusions: The S-Detect HSe mode matches radiologists' performance. Alternative modes provide sensitivity and specificity adjustments. The patient age and lesion size influence the diagnostic performance across all S-Detect modes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
The Value of Clinical Decision Support in Healthcare: A Focus on Screening and Early Detection. Pain-Related White-Matter Changes Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Longitudinal Diffusion Tensor Imaging Pilot Study. Performance Comparison of Two In-House PCR Methods for Detecting Neisseria meningitidis in Asymptomatic Carriers and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling. Fine-Tuned Machine Learning Classifiers for Diagnosing Parkinson's Disease Using Vocal Characteristics: A Comparative Analysis. Comparing ChatGPT 4.0's Performance in Interpreting Thyroid Nodule Ultrasound Reports Using ACR-TI-RADS 2017: Analysis Across Different Levels of Ultrasound User Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1