Diagnostic Value of Increased [18F]FDG Uptake in Locoregional Lymph Nodes on PET/CT in Patients with Suspected Fracture-Related Infection.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Diagnostics Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15050616
Paul Bosch, Andor W J M Glaudemans, Jean-Paul P M de Vries, Johannes H van Snick, Justin V C Lemans, Janna van den Kieboom, Monique G G Hobbelink, Geertje A M Govaert, Frank F A IJpma
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of Increased [18F]FDG Uptake in Locoregional Lymph Nodes on PET/CT in Patients with Suspected Fracture-Related Infection.","authors":"Paul Bosch, Andor W J M Glaudemans, Jean-Paul P M de Vries, Johannes H van Snick, Justin V C Lemans, Janna van den Kieboom, Monique G G Hobbelink, Geertje A M Govaert, Frank F A IJpma","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15050616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Diagnosing fracture-related infection (FRI) without clinical confirmatory signs is challenging. [18F]FDG-PET/CT has been shown to have good diagnostic accuracy. However, direct interpretation criteria are lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of increased FDG-uptake in locoregional lymph nodes on [18F]FDG-PET/CT in patients with suspected upper and lower extremity FRI. <b>Methods</b>: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent [18F]FDG-PET/CT for suspected extremity FRI in two tertiary referral centers between January 2011 and December 2023. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic value of the presence, number and intensity of [18F]FDG uptake in locoregional lymph nodes was assessed. Uptake intensity was measured by calculating the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of the 'hottest' lymph node. All scans were acquired according to the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) standards, and quantification was performed based on standardized EARL reconstructed images. FRI was diagnosed based on positive intra-operative microbiology results or development of clinical confirmatory signs within six months of follow-up. <b>Results</b>: One-hundred-and-twenty-four patients were included in the analysis, with 71 cases of confirmed FRI. The presence of locoregional lymph nodes alone showed poor diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 55%, specificity 68%, diagnostic accuracy 62%). The number of active lymph nodes showed poor discriminative performance between FRI and non-infectious cases (AUC 0.63). Utilizing the SUVmax of the 'hottest' lymph nodes showed a moderate discriminative performance with an AUC of 0.71. The optimal cutoff point (SUVmax 3.48) resulted in a sensitivity of 72%, a specificity of 78% and a diagnostic accuracy of 75%. A logistic regression model was fitted to calculate the added value of lymph node assessment to the regular [18F]FDG-PET/CT assessment. This resulted in a sensitivity of 71%, a specificity of 82% and a diagnostic accuracy of 76%. <b>Conclusions</b>: Presence and number of locoregional lymph nodes with increased [18F]FDG-uptake alone has poor diagnostic accuracy for FRI. The SUVmax of the 'hottest' lymph node showed moderate diagnostic performance. Lymph node assessment slightly increased the diagnostic value of regular [18F]FDG-PET/CT assessment. Based on these results, increased [18F]FDG-uptake in locoregional lymph nodes should only be considered as a suggestive sign for a positive scan result in suspected FRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11898931/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15050616","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diagnosing fracture-related infection (FRI) without clinical confirmatory signs is challenging. [18F]FDG-PET/CT has been shown to have good diagnostic accuracy. However, direct interpretation criteria are lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of increased FDG-uptake in locoregional lymph nodes on [18F]FDG-PET/CT in patients with suspected upper and lower extremity FRI. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent [18F]FDG-PET/CT for suspected extremity FRI in two tertiary referral centers between January 2011 and December 2023. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic value of the presence, number and intensity of [18F]FDG uptake in locoregional lymph nodes was assessed. Uptake intensity was measured by calculating the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of the 'hottest' lymph node. All scans were acquired according to the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) standards, and quantification was performed based on standardized EARL reconstructed images. FRI was diagnosed based on positive intra-operative microbiology results or development of clinical confirmatory signs within six months of follow-up. Results: One-hundred-and-twenty-four patients were included in the analysis, with 71 cases of confirmed FRI. The presence of locoregional lymph nodes alone showed poor diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 55%, specificity 68%, diagnostic accuracy 62%). The number of active lymph nodes showed poor discriminative performance between FRI and non-infectious cases (AUC 0.63). Utilizing the SUVmax of the 'hottest' lymph nodes showed a moderate discriminative performance with an AUC of 0.71. The optimal cutoff point (SUVmax 3.48) resulted in a sensitivity of 72%, a specificity of 78% and a diagnostic accuracy of 75%. A logistic regression model was fitted to calculate the added value of lymph node assessment to the regular [18F]FDG-PET/CT assessment. This resulted in a sensitivity of 71%, a specificity of 82% and a diagnostic accuracy of 76%. Conclusions: Presence and number of locoregional lymph nodes with increased [18F]FDG-uptake alone has poor diagnostic accuracy for FRI. The SUVmax of the 'hottest' lymph node showed moderate diagnostic performance. Lymph node assessment slightly increased the diagnostic value of regular [18F]FDG-PET/CT assessment. Based on these results, increased [18F]FDG-uptake in locoregional lymph nodes should only be considered as a suggestive sign for a positive scan result in suspected FRI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
The Value of Clinical Decision Support in Healthcare: A Focus on Screening and Early Detection. Pain-Related White-Matter Changes Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Longitudinal Diffusion Tensor Imaging Pilot Study. Performance Comparison of Two In-House PCR Methods for Detecting Neisseria meningitidis in Asymptomatic Carriers and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling. Fine-Tuned Machine Learning Classifiers for Diagnosing Parkinson's Disease Using Vocal Characteristics: A Comparative Analysis. Comparing ChatGPT 4.0's Performance in Interpreting Thyroid Nodule Ultrasound Reports Using ACR-TI-RADS 2017: Analysis Across Different Levels of Ultrasound User Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1