Mortality Outcome Associated with Specific KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF Hot-Spot Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Diagnostics Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15050590
Omer Abdelgadir, Yong-Fang Kuo, M Firoze Khan, Anthony O Okorodudu, Yu-Wei Cheng, Jianli Dong
{"title":"Mortality Outcome Associated with Specific <i>KRAS</i>, <i>NRAS</i>, and <i>BRAF</i> Hot-Spot Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Omer Abdelgadir, Yong-Fang Kuo, M Firoze Khan, Anthony O Okorodudu, Yu-Wei Cheng, Jianli Dong","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15050590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objective:</b> The prognostic value of specific hot-spot mutations within <i>KRAS</i>, <i>NRAS</i>, and <i>BRAF</i> genes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) genes remains debatable. This study explores whether certain <i>KRAS</i>, <i>NRAS</i>, and <i>BRAF</i> mutations are associated with the risk of all-cause mortality in mCRC. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed records of 494 patients with mCRC treated at the University of Texas Medical Branch between January 2016 and July 2023. Data on genetic mutations and clinicopathological features were collected for this analysis. We estimated survival probabilities and conducted multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the impact of specific mutations on all-cause mortality risk. <b>Results:</b><i>KRAS</i> c.35G>T (p.Gly12Val) and c.34G>T (p.Gly12Cys) mutations were significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the overall mCRC population and the treated mCRC subgroup. <i>KRAS</i> c.38G>A (p.Gly13Asp) was significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the treated mCRC subgroup but <i>BRAF</i> c.1799T>A (p.Val600Glu) was significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the overall mCRC population. No significant association was observed between <i>NRAS</i> mutations and mortality risk in mCRC, possibly due to their lower frequency or different biological effects compared to <i>KRAS</i> and <i>BRAF</i> mutations. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings suggest that specific <i>KRAS</i> [c.35G>T (p.Gly12Val), c.34G>T (p.Gly12Cys), and c.38G>A (p.Gly13Asp)] and <i>BRAF</i> c.1799T>A (p.Val600Glu) mutations may have prognostic value in mCRC. However, given the single-center study design and lack of direct therapeutic implications, larger multicenter studies are needed to substantiate these results and better define the clinical relevance of these mutations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11899597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15050590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objective: The prognostic value of specific hot-spot mutations within KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF genes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) genes remains debatable. This study explores whether certain KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations are associated with the risk of all-cause mortality in mCRC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed records of 494 patients with mCRC treated at the University of Texas Medical Branch between January 2016 and July 2023. Data on genetic mutations and clinicopathological features were collected for this analysis. We estimated survival probabilities and conducted multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the impact of specific mutations on all-cause mortality risk. Results:KRAS c.35G>T (p.Gly12Val) and c.34G>T (p.Gly12Cys) mutations were significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the overall mCRC population and the treated mCRC subgroup. KRAS c.38G>A (p.Gly13Asp) was significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the treated mCRC subgroup but BRAF c.1799T>A (p.Val600Glu) was significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the overall mCRC population. No significant association was observed between NRAS mutations and mortality risk in mCRC, possibly due to their lower frequency or different biological effects compared to KRAS and BRAF mutations. Conclusions: These findings suggest that specific KRAS [c.35G>T (p.Gly12Val), c.34G>T (p.Gly12Cys), and c.38G>A (p.Gly13Asp)] and BRAF c.1799T>A (p.Val600Glu) mutations may have prognostic value in mCRC. However, given the single-center study design and lack of direct therapeutic implications, larger multicenter studies are needed to substantiate these results and better define the clinical relevance of these mutations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与转移性结直肠癌患者特异性KRAS、NRAS和BRAF热点突变相关的死亡率结局:一项回顾性队列研究
背景/目的:KRAS、NRAS和BRAF基因特异性热点突变在转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)基因中的预后价值仍有争议。本研究探讨了某些KRAS、NRAS和BRAF突变是否与mCRC的全因死亡风险相关。方法:我们回顾性分析2016年1月至2023年7月在德克萨斯大学医学分部治疗的494例mCRC患者的记录。收集基因突变和临床病理特征的数据进行分析。我们估计了生存概率,并进行了多变量Cox比例风险回归,以评估特定突变对全因死亡风险的影响。结果:KRAS c.35G>T (p.Gly12Val)和c.34G>T (p.Gly12Cys)突变与总体mCRC人群和接受治疗的mCRC亚组的全因死亡率风险增加显著相关。KRAS c.38G>A (p.Gly13Asp)与接受治疗的mCRC亚组中全因死亡率风险增加显著相关,而BRAF c.1799T>A (p.Val600Glu)与总体mCRC人群中全因死亡率风险增加显著相关。未观察到NRAS突变与mCRC死亡风险之间的显著关联,这可能是由于与KRAS和BRAF突变相比,NRAS突变的频率较低或生物学效应不同。结论:这些发现提示特异性KRAS [c]。35G b> T (p.Gly12Val)、c.34G>T (p.Gly12Cys)和c.38G>A (p.Gly13Asp)]和BRAF c.1799T>A (p.Val600Glu)突变可能在mCRC中具有预后价值。然而,考虑到单中心研究设计和缺乏直接的治疗意义,需要更大的多中心研究来证实这些结果并更好地定义这些突变的临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Impact of Different Skeletal Orthodontic Anomalies on Condylar Asymmetry Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Association Between Serum Testosterone Levels and Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Cross-Sectional Study in Central European Population. A Novel Dual-Modality Dual-View Hybrid Deep Learning-Machine Learning Framework for the Prediction of Carotid Plaque Vulnerability via Late Fusion. AI-Assisted OCT Imaging for Core Needle Biopsy Guidance: The 1st in Humans Study. Assessment of Optimal Stent Implantation with the Use of Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1