Clinical stage-specific prognostic impact of adequate lymphadenectomy in early-stage lung cancer.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezaf083
Chia Liu, Ko-Han Lin, Hui-Mei Chen, Lei-Chi Wang, Yi-Chen Yeh, Po-Kuei Hsu, Chien-Sheng Huang, Chih-Cheng Hsieh, Han-Shui Hsu
{"title":"Clinical stage-specific prognostic impact of adequate lymphadenectomy in early-stage lung cancer.","authors":"Chia Liu, Ko-Han Lin, Hui-Mei Chen, Lei-Chi Wang, Yi-Chen Yeh, Po-Kuei Hsu, Chien-Sheng Huang, Chih-Cheng Hsieh, Han-Shui Hsu","doi":"10.1093/ejcts/ezaf083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the prognostic impact of adequate lymphadenectomy and determine the optimal nodal assessment for different clinical stages of lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 1214 patients with clinical stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer who had preoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography and curative surgery (2006-2017). Patients were categorized based on whether they had adequate (R0) or inadequate lymphadenectomy [R(un)]. Propensity score matching was conducted to minimize bias. Primary end points were recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival. Secondary end points included outcomes stratified by clinical stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate Cox analysis identified preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level, tumour size, uptake of tumour on positron emission tomography/computed tomography, R(un) [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.16; P < 0.001), angiolymphatic invasion, lymph node involvement and postoperative adjuvant therapy as independent predictors of RFS. The matched cohort included 440 R0 and 440 R(un) patients, with a median follow-up of 94 months. Significant differences were found in 10-year RFS (77.2% vs 61.3%, P < 0.001), OS (75.8% vs 64.3%, P < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (83.8% vs 74.2%, P < 0.001). Despite longer operative time for R0 (210 vs 195 min, P = 0.008), perioperative complications, hospital stay length and blood loss were similar. Subgroup analysis showed R(un) as an independent predictor of RFS in clinical stages IA3 (HR = 2.53, P = 0.001), IB (HR = 1.71, P = 0.046), and II (HR = 2.44, P < 0.001), but not in IA1 or IA2. R0 had significantly better RFS than R(un) in matched cohort of stages IA3 (P = 0.003), IB (P = 0.001) and II (P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adequate lymph node assessment improves prognosis in patients with clinical stages ≥ IA3. A uniform nodal assessment approach should be reconsidered for different clinical stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":11938,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the prognostic impact of adequate lymphadenectomy and determine the optimal nodal assessment for different clinical stages of lung cancer.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1214 patients with clinical stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer who had preoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography and curative surgery (2006-2017). Patients were categorized based on whether they had adequate (R0) or inadequate lymphadenectomy [R(un)]. Propensity score matching was conducted to minimize bias. Primary end points were recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival. Secondary end points included outcomes stratified by clinical stages.

Results: Multivariate Cox analysis identified preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level, tumour size, uptake of tumour on positron emission tomography/computed tomography, R(un) [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.16; P < 0.001), angiolymphatic invasion, lymph node involvement and postoperative adjuvant therapy as independent predictors of RFS. The matched cohort included 440 R0 and 440 R(un) patients, with a median follow-up of 94 months. Significant differences were found in 10-year RFS (77.2% vs 61.3%, P < 0.001), OS (75.8% vs 64.3%, P < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (83.8% vs 74.2%, P < 0.001). Despite longer operative time for R0 (210 vs 195 min, P = 0.008), perioperative complications, hospital stay length and blood loss were similar. Subgroup analysis showed R(un) as an independent predictor of RFS in clinical stages IA3 (HR = 2.53, P = 0.001), IB (HR = 1.71, P = 0.046), and II (HR = 2.44, P < 0.001), but not in IA1 or IA2. R0 had significantly better RFS than R(un) in matched cohort of stages IA3 (P = 0.003), IB (P = 0.001) and II (P = 0.001).

Conclusions: Adequate lymph node assessment improves prognosis in patients with clinical stages ≥ IA3. A uniform nodal assessment approach should be reconsidered for different clinical stages.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期肺癌适当的淋巴结切除术对临床分期特异性预后的影响。
目的:探讨适当的淋巴结切除术对肺癌预后的影响,确定不同临床分期的最佳淋巴结评估方法。方法:回顾性分析2006-2017年1214例术前行PET/CT和根治性手术的临床I-III期非小细胞肺癌患者。患者根据是否进行了充分的[R0]或不充分的淋巴结切除术[R(un)]进行分类。进行倾向评分匹配以尽量减少偏差。主要终点为无复发生存期(RFS)、总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)。次要终点包括按临床分期分层的结果。结果:多因素Cox分析确定术前癌胚抗原水平、肿瘤大小、PET/CT肿瘤摄取、R(un)(风险比(HR)= 2.16;p结论:充分的淋巴结评估可改善临床分期≥IA3患者的预后。对于不同的临床阶段,应重新考虑统一的淋巴结评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
564
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The primary aim of the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is to provide a medium for the publication of high-quality original scientific reports documenting progress in cardiac and thoracic surgery. The journal publishes reports of significant clinical and experimental advances related to surgery of the heart, the great vessels and the chest. The European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is an international journal and accepts submissions from all regions. The journal is supported by a number of leading European societies.
期刊最新文献
Long-term survival from a randomized controlled trial of lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for early-stage lung cancer. Ventricular switch procedure: updated outcomes and lessons learned. Prevalence and anatomical characteristics of the left medial basal pulmonary segment: a retrospective cohort study using three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction. Randomized Trials in Cardiac Surgery: Why and How. Sex difference in aortic root replacement with a stentless bioprosthesis†.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1