Electrically evoked mismatch negativity from speech stimuli as an objective measure of cochlear implant performance.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Frontiers in Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-02-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnins.2025.1559141
Lichun Zhang, Pattric Stauga, David Mißler, Karsten Ehrt, Wilma Großmann, Robert Mlynski, Florian Herrmann Schmidt
{"title":"Electrically evoked mismatch negativity from speech stimuli as an objective measure of cochlear implant performance.","authors":"Lichun Zhang, Pattric Stauga, David Mißler, Karsten Ehrt, Wilma Großmann, Robert Mlynski, Florian Herrmann Schmidt","doi":"10.3389/fnins.2025.1559141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cochlear implant (CI) success is often assessed using subjective tests like word recognition scores (WRS). However, these tests are unsuitable for children, non-native speakers, and individuals with cognitive impairments. Mismatch negativity (MMN), an objective measure of cortical auditory processing, offers a promising alternative for evaluating speech perception. This study aimed to assess speech perception in CI patients using MMN and examine its correlation with WRS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 23 ears from CI users fitted for at least six months. Speech stimuli were presented via direct audio input to the CI processor at 70 dB nHL using an MMN paradigm. The syllables 'ba' (standard) and 'da' (deviant) served as stimuli. MMN amplitude and latency were analyzed, and their correlation with WRS was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant correlation was observed between WRS and MMN responses. CI users with lower WRS scores exhibited reduced MMN amplitudes and prolonged latencies compared to those with higher scores, indicating impaired cortical speech processing.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings suggest that speech-induced MMN could serve as an objective tool for assessing speech perception in CI users. MMN provides valuable insights for optimizing CI fitting, particularly for patients unable to undergo subjective testing. Integrating MMN into clinical practice could improve speech perception outcomes and enhance the quality of life for CI users.</p>","PeriodicalId":12639,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neuroscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1559141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11896987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2025.1559141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cochlear implant (CI) success is often assessed using subjective tests like word recognition scores (WRS). However, these tests are unsuitable for children, non-native speakers, and individuals with cognitive impairments. Mismatch negativity (MMN), an objective measure of cortical auditory processing, offers a promising alternative for evaluating speech perception. This study aimed to assess speech perception in CI patients using MMN and examine its correlation with WRS.

Methods: The study included 23 ears from CI users fitted for at least six months. Speech stimuli were presented via direct audio input to the CI processor at 70 dB nHL using an MMN paradigm. The syllables 'ba' (standard) and 'da' (deviant) served as stimuli. MMN amplitude and latency were analyzed, and their correlation with WRS was examined.

Results: A significant correlation was observed between WRS and MMN responses. CI users with lower WRS scores exhibited reduced MMN amplitudes and prolonged latencies compared to those with higher scores, indicating impaired cortical speech processing.

Discussion: These findings suggest that speech-induced MMN could serve as an objective tool for assessing speech perception in CI users. MMN provides valuable insights for optimizing CI fitting, particularly for patients unable to undergo subjective testing. Integrating MMN into clinical practice could improve speech perception outcomes and enhance the quality of life for CI users.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语音刺激电诱发错配消极性作为人工耳蜗性能的客观测量。
人工耳蜗植入(CI)的成功与否通常是通过主观测试来评估的,比如单词识别分数(WRS)。然而,这些测试不适合儿童、非母语人士和有认知障碍的人。失配负性(MMN)是一种客观的皮层听觉处理测量方法,为评估语音感知提供了一种有希望的替代方法。本研究旨在评估使用MMN的CI患者的语音感知,并检查其与WRS的相关性。方法:研究纳入了23只耳蜗,这些耳蜗来自于至少6个月的CI使用者。语音刺激通过70 dB nHL的直接音频输入到CI处理器,使用MMN范例。音节“ba”(标准)和“da”(偏差)作为刺激。分析MMN振幅和潜伏期,并分析其与WRS的相关性。结果:WRS与MMN反应有显著相关性。与得分较高的人相比,WRS得分较低的CI使用者表现出MMN振幅降低和潜伏期延长,表明皮层言语处理受损。讨论:这些发现表明,语音诱导的MMN可以作为评估CI用户语音感知的客观工具。MMN为优化CI拟合提供了有价值的见解,特别是对于无法进行主观测试的患者。将MMN纳入临床实践可以改善语音感知结果,提高CI使用者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Frontiers in Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
2070
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Neural Technology is devoted to the convergence between neurobiology and quantum-, nano- and micro-sciences. In our vision, this interdisciplinary approach should go beyond the technological development of sophisticated methods and should contribute in generating a genuine change in our discipline.
期刊最新文献
Adaptation of visual responses in degenerating rd10 and healthy mouse retinas during ongoing electrical stimulation. Identifying potential inflammatory therapeutic targets and drug candidates in small fiber neuropathy: integrating Mendelian randomization, experimental validation, and deep learning. Editorial: Impact of acoustic environments and noise on auditory perception. Application of diffusion tensor imaging analysis along perivascular spaces in evaluating glymphatic system function in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Editorial: Music and medicine: from basic science to clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1