Impact of surgical site infection on short- and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: a two-center retrospective study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY International Journal of Colorectal Disease Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1007/s00384-025-04842-9
Shuangming Lin, Hao Zeng, Xiaojie Wang, Xueyi Xue, Yushuo Chen, Baodong Liao, Ying Huang, Dongbo Xu, Pan Chi
{"title":"Impact of surgical site infection on short- and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: a two-center retrospective study.","authors":"Shuangming Lin, Hao Zeng, Xiaojie Wang, Xueyi Xue, Yushuo Chen, Baodong Liao, Ying Huang, Dongbo Xu, Pan Chi","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-04842-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Robot-assisted surgery has increasingly gained recognition in the treatment of rectal cancer. This study aimed to assess the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) that underwent robot-assisted radical rectal cancer surgery and to evaluate their influence on patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 360 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical rectal cancer surgery between 2017 and 2024 at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital and Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University. The patients were categorized into surgical site infection and non-surgical site infection groups based on the presence of surgical site infection. Baseline clinicopathological characteristics, perioperative details, and follow-up data were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of surgical site infection, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were utilized to evaluate factors influencing overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that 44 out of 360 patients (12.2%) developed surgical site infection. Multivariate analysis indicated that positive perineural invasion (OR 3.59, 95% CI 1.50-8.62, P = 0.004) is an independent risk factor for SSI. Low anterior resection (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.73, P = 0.011), preservation of the left colonic artery (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09-0.44, P < 0.001), and neoadjuvant therapy (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.23-0.89, P = 0.021) were associated with reduced risks of SSI. The presence of SSI was significantly associated with a reduction in overall survival (HR 3.43, 95% CI 1.30-9.04, P = 0.012). The risk of developing surgical site infection increases with the number of risk factors, and patients with two or more risk factors have a much higher risk of developing SSI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified perineural invasion as an independent risk factor for the development of SSI that underwent robot-assisted radical rectal cancer surgery. Low anterior resection, preservation of the left colonic artery, and neoadjuvant therapy emerged as protective factors. Moreover, the presence of surgical site infection was significantly correlated with poorer overall survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"40 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11903511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-025-04842-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Robot-assisted surgery has increasingly gained recognition in the treatment of rectal cancer. This study aimed to assess the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) that underwent robot-assisted radical rectal cancer surgery and to evaluate their influence on patient outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 360 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical rectal cancer surgery between 2017 and 2024 at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital and Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University. The patients were categorized into surgical site infection and non-surgical site infection groups based on the presence of surgical site infection. Baseline clinicopathological characteristics, perioperative details, and follow-up data were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of surgical site infection, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were utilized to evaluate factors influencing overall survival.

Results: The study found that 44 out of 360 patients (12.2%) developed surgical site infection. Multivariate analysis indicated that positive perineural invasion (OR 3.59, 95% CI 1.50-8.62, P = 0.004) is an independent risk factor for SSI. Low anterior resection (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.73, P = 0.011), preservation of the left colonic artery (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09-0.44, P < 0.001), and neoadjuvant therapy (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.23-0.89, P = 0.021) were associated with reduced risks of SSI. The presence of SSI was significantly associated with a reduction in overall survival (HR 3.43, 95% CI 1.30-9.04, P = 0.012). The risk of developing surgical site infection increases with the number of risk factors, and patients with two or more risk factors have a much higher risk of developing SSI.

Conclusions: This study identified perineural invasion as an independent risk factor for the development of SSI that underwent robot-assisted radical rectal cancer surgery. Low anterior resection, preservation of the left colonic artery, and neoadjuvant therapy emerged as protective factors. Moreover, the presence of surgical site infection was significantly correlated with poorer overall survival.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术部位感染对机器人辅助直肠癌手术短期和长期结果的影响:一项双中心回顾性研究
目的:机器人辅助手术在直肠癌治疗中得到越来越多的认可。本研究旨在评估机器人辅助根治性直肠癌手术中手术部位感染(SSI)的发生率,并评估其对患者预后的影响。方法:回顾性分析2017 - 2024年在福建医科大学协和医院和福建医科大学龙岩第一附属医院接受机器人辅助直肠癌根治性手术的360例患者。根据有无手术部位感染分为手术部位感染组和非手术部位感染组。分析基线临床病理特征、围手术期细节和随访资料。采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析确定手术部位感染的独立预测因素,并采用Cox比例风险回归模型评价影响总生存的因素。结果:360例患者中有44例(12.2%)发生手术部位感染。多因素分析显示,神经周围浸润阳性(OR 3.59, 95% CI 1.50-8.62, P = 0.004)是SSI的独立危险因素。低前切除术(OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.73, P = 0.011),保留左结肠动脉(OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09-0.44, P)。结论:本研究确定神经周围侵犯是机器人辅助根治性直肠癌手术发生SSI的独立危险因素。低位前切除术、保留左结肠动脉和新辅助治疗成为保护因素。此外,手术部位感染的存在与较差的总生存率显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
期刊最新文献
Electroacupuncture combined with biofeedback for obstructed defecation syndrome: a retrospective cohort study. Clinical utility of the Oakland score in rectal bleeding: Implications for admission decisions and cost efficiency. Risk factors and prediction model for post-polypectomy metachronous colorectal adenoma. Analysis of diverting ileostomy for colorectal cancer surgery: stenosis and T4 invasion are risk factors of reoperation due to anastomotic leakage, even when ileostomy is performed. Histological architecture of the intersphincteric region of the anal canal: implications for the anatomical basis of anal fistula pathways.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1