Prevalence and Factors with Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing among Older Surgical Outpatients in China: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Study in 100 Hospitals.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1007/s44197-025-00378-x
Fangyuan Tian, Zhaoyan Chen, Jinyuan Zhang, Ying Zhang, Qiyi Feng
{"title":"Prevalence and Factors with Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing among Older Surgical Outpatients in China: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Study in 100 Hospitals.","authors":"Fangyuan Tian, Zhaoyan Chen, Jinyuan Zhang, Ying Zhang, Qiyi Feng","doi":"10.1007/s44197-025-00378-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older outpatients face a heightened risk of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP). However, there is a paucity of evidence evaluating PIP in older outpatients attending surgical outpatient departments in China using Chinese-specific criteria. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of PIP and identify associated factors within this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional design was employed, utilizing prescription data from older surgical outpatients across 100 hospitals in seven Chinese cities between January and December 2021. PIP was assessed based on Chinese criteria, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors. Trends were analyzed using the average annual percent change (AAPC) via joinpoint regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 357,135 prescriptions for older surgical outpatients were analyzed. The prevalence of PIP according to Chinese criteria was 13.06%. The five most commonly identified potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) were doxazosin, clopidogrel, tolterodine, estazolam, and the concurrent use of more than two NSAIDs, which together accounted for 52.73% of all PIMs. From January to December, the prevalence of PIP exhibited a slight decrease, from 13.29 to 13.21% (AAPC: -0.278%). Logistic regression revealed that factors such as tertiary-level hospital status, polypharmacy, pain, sleep disorders, hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and stone disease were positively associated with PIP in older surgical outpatients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study found that while the prevalence of PIP among older surgical outpatients in China is relatively low, attention is needed to the widespread use of certain PIMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"15 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44197-025-00378-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older outpatients face a heightened risk of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP). However, there is a paucity of evidence evaluating PIP in older outpatients attending surgical outpatient departments in China using Chinese-specific criteria. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of PIP and identify associated factors within this population.

Methods: A cross-sectional design was employed, utilizing prescription data from older surgical outpatients across 100 hospitals in seven Chinese cities between January and December 2021. PIP was assessed based on Chinese criteria, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors. Trends were analyzed using the average annual percent change (AAPC) via joinpoint regression.

Results: A total of 357,135 prescriptions for older surgical outpatients were analyzed. The prevalence of PIP according to Chinese criteria was 13.06%. The five most commonly identified potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) were doxazosin, clopidogrel, tolterodine, estazolam, and the concurrent use of more than two NSAIDs, which together accounted for 52.73% of all PIMs. From January to December, the prevalence of PIP exhibited a slight decrease, from 13.29 to 13.21% (AAPC: -0.278%). Logistic regression revealed that factors such as tertiary-level hospital status, polypharmacy, pain, sleep disorders, hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and stone disease were positively associated with PIP in older surgical outpatients.

Conclusions: The study found that while the prevalence of PIP among older surgical outpatients in China is relatively low, attention is needed to the widespread use of certain PIMs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
1.40%
发文量
57
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health is an esteemed international publication, offering a platform for peer-reviewed articles that drive advancements in global epidemiology and international health. Our mission is to shape global health policy by showcasing cutting-edge scholarship and innovative strategies.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Factors Associated With Hepatitis C Virus in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A Large Cross-Sectional Study. Prevalence and Factors with Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing among Older Surgical Outpatients in China: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Study in 100 Hospitals. Temporal Dynamics of Microbial Community Composition and Antimicrobial Resistance in a Mass Gathering Setting Using Culturomics and Metagenomic Approaches. Impact of Control Interventions on Malaria Incidence in the General Population of Mali. Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of Human Metapneumovirus-Associated Acute Respiratory Tract Infection Cases in the Pudong New Area, Shanghai, from 2014 to 2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1