Rurality Status and Cardiovascular Events/Survival in Older Men With Prostate Cancer.

IF 16.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2024.7094
Stephanie Jiang, Vraj Patel, Nickolas Stabellini, Biplab Datta, Priyanshu Nain, Lakshya Seth, Harikrishnan H Kunhiraman, Darryl Nettles, Sarah Malik, Sagar A Patel, Manali Rupji, Kevin Ward, Jeffrey M Switchenko, Justin X Moore, Neal L Weintraub, Avirup Guha
{"title":"Rurality Status and Cardiovascular Events/Survival in Older Men With Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Stephanie Jiang, Vraj Patel, Nickolas Stabellini, Biplab Datta, Priyanshu Nain, Lakshya Seth, Harikrishnan H Kunhiraman, Darryl Nettles, Sarah Malik, Sagar A Patel, Manali Rupji, Kevin Ward, Jeffrey M Switchenko, Justin X Moore, Neal L Weintraub, Avirup Guha","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rural areas have higher cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence and age-adjusted mortality rates in the general population. However, the impact of rurality on CVD development and outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PC) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used the SEER-Medicare database to analyze males aged ≥65 years diagnosed with PC between 2009 and 2017. The primary exposures were patient rurality status (metropolitan, urban, or rural) and patient-provider rurality, which combined the provider's status (metropolitan vs nonmetropolitan) with the patient's rurality. The primary outcomes included post-PC CVD (comprising heart failure, atrial fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, and ischemic stroke), cardiovascular mortality (CVDm), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSm), and all-cause mortality. Multivariable Fine-Gray and extended Cox models were used to assess the impact of rurality impact on these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 103,327 older men were included in the study, of whom 3,631 were from rural areas and 1,857 were rural patients with nonmetropolitan providers. Compared with metropolitan patients, those from rural areas had a 28% higher risk of PCSm (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.28; 95% CI, 1.14-1.44) and a 15% higher risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07-1.23). Compared with urban patients, rural patients had a 7% higher risk of CVD (SHR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.13). No significant differences were observed in CVDm. Among patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy (n=16,811), rurality was associated with a 27% higher risk of PCSm (SHR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07-1.51) and a 29% higher risk of all-cause mortality (aHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.12-1.49). Rural patients who received care from nonmetropolitan providers had higher risks of PCSm and all-cause mortality compared with those treated by metropolitan providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rurality is associated with higher risks of CVD, PCSm, and all-cause mortality compared with metropolitan and urban patients. Provider rurality further increases these risks, underscoring the critical role of health care access and quality in rural health disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7094","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rural areas have higher cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence and age-adjusted mortality rates in the general population. However, the impact of rurality on CVD development and outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PC) remains unclear.

Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort study used the SEER-Medicare database to analyze males aged ≥65 years diagnosed with PC between 2009 and 2017. The primary exposures were patient rurality status (metropolitan, urban, or rural) and patient-provider rurality, which combined the provider's status (metropolitan vs nonmetropolitan) with the patient's rurality. The primary outcomes included post-PC CVD (comprising heart failure, atrial fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, and ischemic stroke), cardiovascular mortality (CVDm), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSm), and all-cause mortality. Multivariable Fine-Gray and extended Cox models were used to assess the impact of rurality impact on these outcomes.

Results: A total of 103,327 older men were included in the study, of whom 3,631 were from rural areas and 1,857 were rural patients with nonmetropolitan providers. Compared with metropolitan patients, those from rural areas had a 28% higher risk of PCSm (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.28; 95% CI, 1.14-1.44) and a 15% higher risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07-1.23). Compared with urban patients, rural patients had a 7% higher risk of CVD (SHR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.13). No significant differences were observed in CVDm. Among patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy (n=16,811), rurality was associated with a 27% higher risk of PCSm (SHR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07-1.51) and a 29% higher risk of all-cause mortality (aHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.12-1.49). Rural patients who received care from nonmetropolitan providers had higher risks of PCSm and all-cause mortality compared with those treated by metropolitan providers.

Conclusions: Rurality is associated with higher risks of CVD, PCSm, and all-cause mortality compared with metropolitan and urban patients. Provider rurality further increases these risks, underscoring the critical role of health care access and quality in rural health disparities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年前列腺癌患者的农村状况与心血管事件/生存
背景:农村地区在一般人群中有较高的心血管疾病(CVD)发病率和年龄调整死亡率。然而,农村对前列腺癌(PC)患者CVD发展和预后的影响尚不清楚。患者和方法:本回顾性队列研究使用SEER-Medicare数据库分析了2009年至2017年诊断为PC的年龄≥65岁的男性。主要暴露是患者的农村状况(大都市、城市或农村)和患者-提供者的农村状况,即提供者的状况(大都市vs非大都市)与患者的农村状况相结合。主要结局包括pc后CVD(包括心力衰竭、心房颤动、急性心肌梗死、外周动脉疾病和缺血性中风)、心血管死亡率(CVDm)、前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSm)和全因死亡率。使用多变量细灰色和扩展Cox模型来评估乡村性对这些结果的影响。结果:共有103327名老年男性纳入研究,其中3631名来自农村地区,1857名来自非城市医疗机构的农村患者。与城市患者相比,农村患者发生PCSm的风险高出28%(亚分布风险比[SHR], 1.28;95% CI, 1.14-1.44),全因死亡风险增加15%(校正风险比[aHR], 1.15;95% ci, 1.07-1.23)。与城市患者相比,农村患者患CVD的风险高7% (SHR, 1.07;95% ci, 1.01-1.13)。在CVDm中未观察到显著差异。在接受雄激素剥夺治疗的患者中(n=16,811),农村生活与PCSm的风险增加27%相关(SHR, 1.27;95% CI, 1.07-1.51),全因死亡率增加29% (aHR, 1.29;95% ci, 1.12-1.49)。接受非城市医疗机构治疗的农村患者与接受城市医疗机构治疗的患者相比,PCSm和全因死亡率的风险更高。结论:与大都市和城市患者相比,农村患者CVD、PCSm和全因死亡率的风险更高。提供者的农村性进一步增加了这些风险,突出了卫生保健的可及性和质量在农村卫生差距中的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care. Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship. JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.
期刊最新文献
How Healthy Are the Diets of Cancer Survivors? Characteristics of Those Most at Risk and Opportunities for Improvement. Assessing the Performance of the PREDICT Breast Version 3.0 Prognostic Tool in Patients With Breast Cancer in the United States. A Case of Cryptic CBFB::MYH11 Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Noncanonical Breakpoints Detected by Optical Genome Mapping. Authors' Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Kim et al: Are We Asking the Right Question for New Biomarkers - "Ready for Prime Time" Versus Demonstrated Clinical Utility? Letter to the Editor: Are We Asking the Right Question for New Biomarkers - "Ready for Prime Time" Versus Demonstrated Clinical Utility?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1