Measuring real-time violence exposure and its impact on intimate partner violence perpetration among adolescents.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0318063
Rachel Kidman, Janan Janine Dietrich, Xiaoyue Zhang, Candice W Ramsammy, Phumla Madi, Stefanie Vermaak, Buisiwe Nkala-Dlamini, Avy Violari
{"title":"Measuring real-time violence exposure and its impact on intimate partner violence perpetration among adolescents.","authors":"Rachel Kidman, Janan Janine Dietrich, Xiaoyue Zhang, Candice W Ramsammy, Phumla Madi, Stefanie Vermaak, Buisiwe Nkala-Dlamini, Avy Violari","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0318063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intimate partner violence (IPV) has dire health consequences. To intervene, it is critical we first understand why young men perpetrate IPV. One theory is that men who experience violence are more likely to perpetrate violence. We used real time data to examine how daily and repeat experiences of violence affect IPV behaviors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 498 males aged 15-19 years in Soweto, South Africa during 2020-2022. We collected data through weekly mobile phone surveys (n = 12,603) delivered over a year. Generalized linear mixed effect models were used to fit IPV perpetration as a function of past-24-hour violence victimization; models included indicators for between-person and within-person components of victimization.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In at least one survey submitted, 13% of boys reported perpetrating physical IPV and 5% perpetrating sexual IPV. Any victimization in the past 24-hours significantly increased the odds of physical (OR 4.00) and sexual violence perpetration (OR 2.45). When examined individually, sexual violence victimization had the strongest association (OR of 7.96 for physical and 4.88 sexual IPV perpetration). We also examined the between-person influence of victimization. Boys who experienced more violence on average (a higher person-centered mean exposure) were substantially more likely to perpetrate both physical IPV and sexual IPV as compared to boys with overall low levels of victimization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adolescent boys who experience violence are more likely to use violence against their partners that same day. To break this cycle, it will be critical to understand the mechanisms by which proximal victimization triggers onward violence perpetration. Both the current findings and the next steps highlight the importance of real-time, repeated data collection.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 3","pages":"e0318063"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11902291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) has dire health consequences. To intervene, it is critical we first understand why young men perpetrate IPV. One theory is that men who experience violence are more likely to perpetrate violence. We used real time data to examine how daily and repeat experiences of violence affect IPV behaviors.

Methods: We enrolled 498 males aged 15-19 years in Soweto, South Africa during 2020-2022. We collected data through weekly mobile phone surveys (n = 12,603) delivered over a year. Generalized linear mixed effect models were used to fit IPV perpetration as a function of past-24-hour violence victimization; models included indicators for between-person and within-person components of victimization.

Findings: In at least one survey submitted, 13% of boys reported perpetrating physical IPV and 5% perpetrating sexual IPV. Any victimization in the past 24-hours significantly increased the odds of physical (OR 4.00) and sexual violence perpetration (OR 2.45). When examined individually, sexual violence victimization had the strongest association (OR of 7.96 for physical and 4.88 sexual IPV perpetration). We also examined the between-person influence of victimization. Boys who experienced more violence on average (a higher person-centered mean exposure) were substantially more likely to perpetrate both physical IPV and sexual IPV as compared to boys with overall low levels of victimization.

Conclusion: Adolescent boys who experience violence are more likely to use violence against their partners that same day. To break this cycle, it will be critical to understand the mechanisms by which proximal victimization triggers onward violence perpetration. Both the current findings and the next steps highlight the importance of real-time, repeated data collection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量青少年的实时暴力暴露及其对亲密伴侣暴力行为的影响。
背景:亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)具有严重的健康后果。为了进行干预,我们首先要了解为什么年轻男性会实施IPV,这一点至关重要。一种理论认为,经历过暴力的男性更有可能实施暴力。我们使用实时数据来检查日常和重复的暴力经历如何影响IPV行为。方法:我们在2020-2022年期间在南非索韦托招募了498名年龄在15-19岁的男性。我们通过一周一次的手机调查收集数据(n = 12603),历时一年。使用广义线性混合效应模型拟合IPV犯罪作为过去24小时暴力受害的函数;模型包括人与人之间和人与人之间受害成分的指标。结果:在至少一项提交的调查中,13%的男孩报告实施身体IPV, 5%实施性IPV。过去24小时内的任何受害行为都显著增加了身体暴力(OR 4.00)和性暴力(OR 2.45)的几率。当单独检查时,性暴力受害具有最强的关联(肢体暴力的OR为7.96,性暴力的OR为4.88)。我们还研究了受害的人际影响。与总体受害程度较低的男孩相比,平均遭受更多暴力的男孩(以人为中心的平均暴露程度较高)更有可能实施身体IPV和性IPV。结论:经历过暴力的青春期男孩更有可能在同一天对其伴侣使用暴力。要打破这一循环,了解近端受害引发后续暴力行为的机制至关重要。目前的研究结果和接下来的步骤都强调了实时、重复数据收集的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
期刊最新文献
CDR-Net: A computerized framework to detect Alzheimer's diseases and mild cognitive impairment. Computational investigation of African natural products as Helicobacter pylori shikimate kinase inhibitors. Which turtle should I study? Uneven distribution of research effort across Testudines species. Local causal dynamic integrated global mode guidance transformer network for pedestrian trajectory prediction. Vector-borne disease surveillance and control resource needs in Colorado public health organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1