Stable isotopes as a predictor for organic or conventional classification of berries and vegetables.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0318179
Xia Zhu-Barker, Michael Liou, Diana Zapata, Jingyi Huang, William R Horwath
{"title":"Stable isotopes as a predictor for organic or conventional classification of berries and vegetables.","authors":"Xia Zhu-Barker, Michael Liou, Diana Zapata, Jingyi Huang, William R Horwath","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0318179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Organic agriculture is expanding worldwide, driven by expectations of improving food quality and soil health. However, while organic certification by regulatory bodies such as the United States Department of Agriculture and the European Union confirms compliance with organic standards that prohibit synthetic chemical inputs, there is limited oversight to verify that organic practices, such as the use of authentic organic fertilizer sources, are consistently applied at the field level. This study investigated the elemental content of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) and their stable isotopes (δ13C and δ15N) in seven different crops grown under organic or conventional practices to assess their applicability as a screening tool to verify the authenticity of organic labeled produce. Holm corrected Welch t-tests and a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) were used to assess the potential of stable isotope or crop elemental content to differentiate organic vs. conventional production systems. Total C and N content or C/N ratio was not significantly different between production systems or among geographic origins for most crops. However, the average N stable isotope (δ15N) content differed, with conventional crops at 1.8 ±  2.2‰ and organic at 6.0 ±  3.4‰. A mixed model incorporating elemental contents and stable isotopes identified δ15N as the primary predictor in discriminating organic and conventional production systems. A δ15N threshold is suggested to differentiate conventional from organic grown raspberries (δ15N <  2.17‰) and strawberries (δ15N <  3.22‰), for an estimated false negative rate of 1%. Although further evaluation is needed, our extensive dataset (n = 791) captures key predictors of agricultural production systems and holds potential as a benchmark for future organic production verification.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 3","pages":"e0318179"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318179","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organic agriculture is expanding worldwide, driven by expectations of improving food quality and soil health. However, while organic certification by regulatory bodies such as the United States Department of Agriculture and the European Union confirms compliance with organic standards that prohibit synthetic chemical inputs, there is limited oversight to verify that organic practices, such as the use of authentic organic fertilizer sources, are consistently applied at the field level. This study investigated the elemental content of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) and their stable isotopes (δ13C and δ15N) in seven different crops grown under organic or conventional practices to assess their applicability as a screening tool to verify the authenticity of organic labeled produce. Holm corrected Welch t-tests and a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) were used to assess the potential of stable isotope or crop elemental content to differentiate organic vs. conventional production systems. Total C and N content or C/N ratio was not significantly different between production systems or among geographic origins for most crops. However, the average N stable isotope (δ15N) content differed, with conventional crops at 1.8 ±  2.2‰ and organic at 6.0 ±  3.4‰. A mixed model incorporating elemental contents and stable isotopes identified δ15N as the primary predictor in discriminating organic and conventional production systems. A δ15N threshold is suggested to differentiate conventional from organic grown raspberries (δ15N <  2.17‰) and strawberries (δ15N <  3.22‰), for an estimated false negative rate of 1%. Although further evaluation is needed, our extensive dataset (n = 791) captures key predictors of agricultural production systems and holds potential as a benchmark for future organic production verification.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
期刊最新文献
Conditioned medium of engineering macrophages combined with soluble microneedles promote diabetic wound healing. Comparison between Go-GutDx, a novel diagnostic stool test kit with potential impact in low-income countries, and BioFire test. The causal effects of inflammatory bowel disease on its ocular manifestations: A Mendelian randomization study. Coping with chronic periprosthetic joint infection after failed revision of total knee and hip arthroplasty: a qualitative study on patient's experiences in treatment and healing. Correction: LightGBM hybrid model based DEM correction for forested areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1