Implementation of a novel hybrid cord blood banking model within a private-public-partnership.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1111/trf.18179
Jessica Laue, L Mariotta, M Fluri, D Castelli, O Kürsteiner, G Nicoloso, A Etter, D Surbek
{"title":"Implementation of a novel hybrid cord blood banking model within a private-public-partnership.","authors":"Jessica Laue, L Mariotta, M Fluri, D Castelli, O Kürsteiner, G Nicoloso, A Etter, D Surbek","doi":"10.1111/trf.18179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Umbilical cord blood (UCB) stem cells can be collected at birth, cryopreserved, and used for transplantation in hematopoietic diseases. Typically, these stem cells are stored in public banks for allogeneic use or in private depositories for potential future utilization by the family. A proposed third option, hybrid cord blood banking, combines elements of both public and private storage. This method allows family-directed UCB to be HLA typed and included in the international registry, making it accessible to compatible patients globally.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We describe the implementation of a novel hybrid cord blood banking model within a private-public partnership involving a university obstetric department, a national stem cell registry, and a private cord blood bank.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2020 to 2023, 67 UCB units were collected for hybrid banking. Of these, 25 samples (37.3%) met the threshold of 120 grams for public banking. Before processing, 5 samples (7.5%) contained over 1.5 E9 total nucleated cells (TNC); after processing, 15 samples (22.46%) exceeded 1.0 E9 TNC. The viability margin of 85% was surpassed in 42 samples (62.7%). Cytofluorimetric analysis showed 36 samples (53.7%) had over 1.25 E6 CD34+ cells, with 63 samples (94.0%) exceeding 85% viability. For HLA typing and registry entry, 10 samples (14.9%) qualified for hybrid purposes, with one sample deemed unsuitable for processing.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study demonstrates the feasibility of the hybrid cord blood banking model within a private-public partnership. This new concept offers an extended option for parents to bank their child's cord blood stem cells.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18179","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Umbilical cord blood (UCB) stem cells can be collected at birth, cryopreserved, and used for transplantation in hematopoietic diseases. Typically, these stem cells are stored in public banks for allogeneic use or in private depositories for potential future utilization by the family. A proposed third option, hybrid cord blood banking, combines elements of both public and private storage. This method allows family-directed UCB to be HLA typed and included in the international registry, making it accessible to compatible patients globally.

Study design and methods: We describe the implementation of a novel hybrid cord blood banking model within a private-public partnership involving a university obstetric department, a national stem cell registry, and a private cord blood bank.

Results: From 2020 to 2023, 67 UCB units were collected for hybrid banking. Of these, 25 samples (37.3%) met the threshold of 120 grams for public banking. Before processing, 5 samples (7.5%) contained over 1.5 E9 total nucleated cells (TNC); after processing, 15 samples (22.46%) exceeded 1.0 E9 TNC. The viability margin of 85% was surpassed in 42 samples (62.7%). Cytofluorimetric analysis showed 36 samples (53.7%) had over 1.25 E6 CD34+ cells, with 63 samples (94.0%) exceeding 85% viability. For HLA typing and registry entry, 10 samples (14.9%) qualified for hybrid purposes, with one sample deemed unsuitable for processing.

Discussion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of the hybrid cord blood banking model within a private-public partnership. This new concept offers an extended option for parents to bank their child's cord blood stem cells.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
期刊最新文献
Automated processing of Meryman-frozen red blood cells: A novel protocol for deglycerolization. Implementation of a novel hybrid cord blood banking model within a private-public-partnership. Have we reached a new baseline for blood collection and transfusion in the United States? National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey, 2023. Effectiveness of prehospital chest decompression in resolving clinical signs of tension pneumothorax. Partial REBOA Zone 1 is associated with lower mortality compared to complete REBOA Zone 1 and emergency department thoracotomy: A cohort study using the AORTA registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1