Endovenous Treatment for Great Saphenous Vein Insufficiency: A Comparative Study of Segmental Radiofrequency and 1470-nm Endovenous Laser.

IF 0.7 Vascular and endovascular surgery Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1177/15385744251327014
Márcio Gomes Filippo, Leonardo de Oliveira Harduin, Thiago Almeida Barroso, Leonardo Cortizo de Almeida, Alberto Schanaider, Gaudencio Espinosa
{"title":"Endovenous Treatment for Great Saphenous Vein Insufficiency: A Comparative Study of Segmental Radiofrequency and 1470-nm Endovenous Laser.","authors":"Márcio Gomes Filippo, Leonardo de Oliveira Harduin, Thiago Almeida Barroso, Leonardo Cortizo de Almeida, Alberto Schanaider, Gaudencio Espinosa","doi":"10.1177/15385744251327014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThis study aims to evaluate recovery time, patient-centric postoperative outcomes, and the efficacy of endovenous laser ablation (LA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating venous insufficiency associated with great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux.MethodsIn this single-center, self-paired, randomized trial, 16 limbs from 8 patients with symptomatic bilateral GSV insufficiency were treated. LA was performed on one lower limb, and after 40 days, the contralateral limb was treated with RFA. For LA, we used a 1470-nm endolaser with radial fiber, and for RFA, the VNUS ClosureFast™ system. All patients were followed with clinical, radiological, and laboratory evaluations for 6 months postoperatively.ResultsBoth techniques showed similar postoperative pain scores, number of complications, time to return to work, and patient satisfaction scores. LA and RFA decreased the mean Venous Clinical Severity Score by the end of the study and achieved a 100% vein occlusion rate, along with a reduction in GSV size. Procedure time was significantly shorter with LA.ConclusionLA and RFA demonstrated similar recovery profiles, pain levels, and patient satisfaction outcomes, maintaining high efficacy in resolving venous insufficiency associated with GSV reflux.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"495-504"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744251327014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to evaluate recovery time, patient-centric postoperative outcomes, and the efficacy of endovenous laser ablation (LA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating venous insufficiency associated with great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux.MethodsIn this single-center, self-paired, randomized trial, 16 limbs from 8 patients with symptomatic bilateral GSV insufficiency were treated. LA was performed on one lower limb, and after 40 days, the contralateral limb was treated with RFA. For LA, we used a 1470-nm endolaser with radial fiber, and for RFA, the VNUS ClosureFast™ system. All patients were followed with clinical, radiological, and laboratory evaluations for 6 months postoperatively.ResultsBoth techniques showed similar postoperative pain scores, number of complications, time to return to work, and patient satisfaction scores. LA and RFA decreased the mean Venous Clinical Severity Score by the end of the study and achieved a 100% vein occlusion rate, along with a reduction in GSV size. Procedure time was significantly shorter with LA.ConclusionLA and RFA demonstrated similar recovery profiles, pain levels, and patient satisfaction outcomes, maintaining high efficacy in resolving venous insufficiency associated with GSV reflux.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉内治疗大隐静脉功能不全:节段射频与1470纳米静脉内激光的比较研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估静脉内激光消融(LA)和射频消融(RFA)治疗大隐静脉(GSV)反流相关静脉功能不全的恢复时间、以患者为中心的术后预后以及疗效。方法对8例双侧GSV功能不全患者的16肢进行单中心、自配对、随机对照试验。在一侧下肢进行LA, 40天后,对侧肢体进行RFA治疗。对于LA,我们使用了1470 nm径向光纤激光器,对于RFA,我们使用了VNUS ClosureFast™系统。所有患者术后6个月进行临床、放射学和实验室评估。结果两种技术的术后疼痛评分、并发症数量、恢复工作时间和患者满意度评分相似。到研究结束时,LA和RFA降低了平均静脉临床严重程度评分,实现了100%的静脉闭塞率,同时减少了GSV大小。手术时间明显缩短。结论la和RFA表现出相似的恢复情况、疼痛水平和患者满意度,在解决GSV反流相关静脉功能不全方面保持高效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality of Digital Patient Education on Interventional Venous Diseases and Interventions. Higher Risk for Morbidity and Non-Aortic Related Mortality in Type 2 Endoleak Patients Treated Outside of Instructions for Use. Effectiveness and Safety of Single Antiplatelet Therapy With Prasugrel in Carotid Artery Stenting. Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia With a False Negative Anti-PF4 Assay. Catheter Directed Mechanical Thrombectomy for Intermediate-Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Clinical Outcomes From a Single Center Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1