Letter: No Biochemical Relapse Is Associated With the Highest Off-Therapy HBsAg Loss Rate—Authors' Reply

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1111/apt.70083
Ying-Nan Tsai, Yao-Chun Hsu
{"title":"Letter: No Biochemical Relapse Is Associated With the Highest Off-Therapy HBsAg Loss Rate—Authors' Reply","authors":"Ying-Nan Tsai,&nbsp;Yao-Chun Hsu","doi":"10.1111/apt.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We thank Professors Jeng and Liaw for their interest in our study [<span>1, 2</span>]. We agree that ALT elevation following cessation of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is not associated with higher HBsAg seroclearance rates. In our study, we found that elevated serum ALT analysed as a time-varying variable was not associated with HBsAg seroclearance regardless of whether the threshold was set at the upper limit of normal (ULN), two-time ULN (clinical relapse) or five-time ULN (acute flares). These findings further examine and validate the results reported in their study [<span>3</span>].</p><p>They noted that the 10-year cumulative incidence of HBsAg seroclearance in the current study (12.4%) was lower than that in our previous research and other studies [<span>3, 4</span>]. We acknowledge that the incidence of HBsAg seroclearance could be underestimated in this real-world retrospective study because HBsAg was not regularly measured following a prespecified protocol in routine clinical practice, unlike in a prospective research setting with selected participants. Moreover, the apparent inconsistency might result from differences in analytical approaches. For instance, observation for HBsAg loss was censored on the resumption of antiviral treatment without considerations of competing risks in our prior study [<span>4</span>]. This approach would yield a significantly higher estimate of HBsAg loss rate as shown in the current study (figure S2). Since retreatment is unlikely independent of the probability of HBsAg seroclearance, analysing it as non-informative censoring may lead to an overestimation of HBsAg seroclearance incidence [<span>5</span>]. Regardless, our sensitivity analyses employing different approaches to estimate HBsAg seroclearance incidence consistently confirmed no association between ALT elevation and HBsAg loss.</p><p>The current study did not specifically investigate the association between retreatment and subsequent HBsAg seroclearance. Nevertheless, a recent randomised study reported that delaying retreatment by adopting a higher threshold did not increase the chance of HBsAg seroclearance in HBeAg-negative patients who stopped NA therapy after a minimum 24 months of viral suppression. They found no patients with an end-of-treatment HBsAg level greater than 1000 IU/mL would clear HBsAg during follow-up, irrespective of the assignment to higher or lower retreatment thresholds [<span>6</span>]. Only patients with EOT HBsAg level below 1000 IU/mL had a chance of HBsAg seroclearance, suggesting that the likelihood of HBsAg seroclearance was already determined by the HBsAg level at treatment cessation, whether or not antiviral therapy was resumed for clinical relapses.</p><p>We fully agree on the importance of rigorous monitoring and timely retreatment to ensure the safety of patients who stop NA therapy [<span>7</span>]. However, acute flare-ups induced by NA withdrawal can progress rapidly, potentially leading to devastating outcomes even in patients meticulously monitored with weekly intervals [<span>8, 9</span>]. Therefore, the practice of finite NA therapy relies on accurately identifying suitable candidates who are likely to achieve maximal benefit with minimal risk. Given that biochemical relapse following NA cessation is not associated with the incidence of HBsAg seroclearance, it is inadvisable to discontinue NA therapy in patients with a high risk of biochemical relapse and a low probability of HBsAg loss, as indicated by established risk predictors [<span>10</span>].</p><p><b>Ying-Nan Tsai:</b> conceptualization, writing – original draft, investigation, visualization, project administration. <b>Yao-Chun Hsu:</b> conceptualization, writing – review and editing, supervision, investigation, visualization, project administration.</p><p>Ying-Nan Tsai reported no conflicts of interest. Yao-Chun Hsu has received research grants from Gilead Sciences; lecture fees from Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Grifols and Roche; and has served as an advisory committee member for Gilead Sciences and Sysmex.</p><p>This article is linked to Tsai et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18515 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70061.</p>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"61 8","pages":"1424-1425"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.70083","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.70083","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We thank Professors Jeng and Liaw for their interest in our study [1, 2]. We agree that ALT elevation following cessation of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is not associated with higher HBsAg seroclearance rates. In our study, we found that elevated serum ALT analysed as a time-varying variable was not associated with HBsAg seroclearance regardless of whether the threshold was set at the upper limit of normal (ULN), two-time ULN (clinical relapse) or five-time ULN (acute flares). These findings further examine and validate the results reported in their study [3].

They noted that the 10-year cumulative incidence of HBsAg seroclearance in the current study (12.4%) was lower than that in our previous research and other studies [3, 4]. We acknowledge that the incidence of HBsAg seroclearance could be underestimated in this real-world retrospective study because HBsAg was not regularly measured following a prespecified protocol in routine clinical practice, unlike in a prospective research setting with selected participants. Moreover, the apparent inconsistency might result from differences in analytical approaches. For instance, observation for HBsAg loss was censored on the resumption of antiviral treatment without considerations of competing risks in our prior study [4]. This approach would yield a significantly higher estimate of HBsAg loss rate as shown in the current study (figure S2). Since retreatment is unlikely independent of the probability of HBsAg seroclearance, analysing it as non-informative censoring may lead to an overestimation of HBsAg seroclearance incidence [5]. Regardless, our sensitivity analyses employing different approaches to estimate HBsAg seroclearance incidence consistently confirmed no association between ALT elevation and HBsAg loss.

The current study did not specifically investigate the association between retreatment and subsequent HBsAg seroclearance. Nevertheless, a recent randomised study reported that delaying retreatment by adopting a higher threshold did not increase the chance of HBsAg seroclearance in HBeAg-negative patients who stopped NA therapy after a minimum 24 months of viral suppression. They found no patients with an end-of-treatment HBsAg level greater than 1000 IU/mL would clear HBsAg during follow-up, irrespective of the assignment to higher or lower retreatment thresholds [6]. Only patients with EOT HBsAg level below 1000 IU/mL had a chance of HBsAg seroclearance, suggesting that the likelihood of HBsAg seroclearance was already determined by the HBsAg level at treatment cessation, whether or not antiviral therapy was resumed for clinical relapses.

We fully agree on the importance of rigorous monitoring and timely retreatment to ensure the safety of patients who stop NA therapy [7]. However, acute flare-ups induced by NA withdrawal can progress rapidly, potentially leading to devastating outcomes even in patients meticulously monitored with weekly intervals [8, 9]. Therefore, the practice of finite NA therapy relies on accurately identifying suitable candidates who are likely to achieve maximal benefit with minimal risk. Given that biochemical relapse following NA cessation is not associated with the incidence of HBsAg seroclearance, it is inadvisable to discontinue NA therapy in patients with a high risk of biochemical relapse and a low probability of HBsAg loss, as indicated by established risk predictors [10].

Ying-Nan Tsai: conceptualization, writing – original draft, investigation, visualization, project administration. Yao-Chun Hsu: conceptualization, writing – review and editing, supervision, investigation, visualization, project administration.

Ying-Nan Tsai reported no conflicts of interest. Yao-Chun Hsu has received research grants from Gilead Sciences; lecture fees from Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Grifols and Roche; and has served as an advisory committee member for Gilead Sciences and Sysmex.

This article is linked to Tsai et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18515 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70061.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无生化复发与最高的停药期HBsAg损失率相关——作者回复
我们感谢郑教授和刘教授对我们的研究感兴趣[1,2]。我们同意慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者停止使用核苷类似物(NAs)后ALT升高与HBsAg血清清除率升高无关。在我们的研究中,我们发现血清ALT升高作为一个时变变量分析与HBsAg血清清除率无关,无论阈值是否设置在正常(ULN),两次ULN(临床复发)或五次ULN(急性发作)的上限。这些发现进一步检验并验证了他们研究报告中的结果。他们指出,本研究中HBsAg血清清除率的10年累积发生率(12.4%)低于我们之前的研究和其他研究[3,4]。我们承认,在这项真实世界的回顾性研究中,HBsAg血清清除率的发生率可能被低估,因为在常规临床实践中,HBsAg没有按照预先指定的方案定期测量,这与选择参与者的前瞻性研究不同。此外,这种明显的不一致可能是分析方法的差异造成的。例如,在我们之前的研究中,在没有考虑竞争风险的情况下,在恢复抗病毒治疗时对HBsAg损失的观察被删除了。如当前研究所示,这种方法将产生明显更高的HBsAg损失率估计值(图S2)。由于再治疗不太可能独立于HBsAg血清清除率的概率,因此将其分析为非信息性审查可能导致对HBsAg血清清除率的高估。无论如何,我们采用不同方法估计HBsAg血清清除率的敏感性分析一致地证实了ALT升高和HBsAg损失之间没有关联。目前的研究没有专门调查再治疗与随后的HBsAg血清清除率之间的关系。然而,最近的一项随机研究报告称,在病毒抑制至少24个月后停止NA治疗的hbeag阴性患者中,通过采用更高的阈值来延迟再治疗并没有增加HBsAg血清清除的机会。他们发现,治疗结束时HBsAg水平大于1000 IU/mL的患者在随访期间都不会清除HBsAg,无论再治疗阈值是高还是低。只有EOT中HBsAg水平低于1000 IU/mL的患者才有机会实现HBsAg的血清清除率,提示无论临床复发是否恢复抗病毒治疗,停止治疗时的HBsAg水平已经决定了HBsAg血清清除率的可能性。我们完全同意严格监测和及时再治疗的重要性,以确保停止NA治疗的患者的安全。然而,NA戒断引起的急性发作可能进展迅速,即使对患者进行每周仔细监测也可能导致毁灭性的后果[8,9]。因此,有限NA治疗的实践依赖于准确识别可能以最小风险获得最大收益的合适候选人。鉴于停用NA后的生化复发与HBsAg血清清除率的发生率无关,如已知的风险预测因子[10]所示,对于生化复发风险高、HBsAg丢失概率低的患者,不建议停止NA治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
期刊最新文献
A Nationwide Assessment of Anticholestatic Therapy Uptake in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Opportunities for Optimisation Validation of the Milan Score Using Prolonged Wireless PH Monitoring Letter: Double PBC-Related Autoantibody Positivity—How Essential Is It for Diagnosis? Authors' Reply Letter: Dose and Donor Matter—Determining the Optimal Strategy for Faecal Microbiota Transplantation in Clostridioides difficile Infection. Authors' Reply Review Article: Ileal Bile Acid Transport ( IBAT ) Inhibitors as an Emerging Treatment for Cholestatic Liver Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1