The value of digital government transformation: Evidence from R&D subsidy efficiency in China

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Financial Analysis Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104106
Deli Wang , Xiaoyuan Liu , Shiyang Hu , Shangrui Wu
{"title":"The value of digital government transformation: Evidence from R&D subsidy efficiency in China","authors":"Deli Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaoyuan Liu ,&nbsp;Shiyang Hu ,&nbsp;Shangrui Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Exploiting a quasi-natural experiment in China in which the Big Data Administration was established in various cities across different times (i.e., pilot cities), we explore the role that digital government transformation plays in curbing firms' R&amp;D manipulation activities. We rely on a staggered difference-in-differences research design and find that firms located in pilot cities significantly reduce the magnitude of their R&amp;D manipulation from the pre- to the post- digital government transformation period, compared to firms located in nonpilot cities during the same time frame. Our analysis shows that digital government transformation mitigates R&amp;D manipulation by strengthening government regulatory powers and normalizing corporate R&amp;D practices. Additionally, we find that this impact is more pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises, manufacturing companies, smaller businesses, and those with less rigorous external oversight. Moreover, we identify a regulatory effect similar to “poverty alleviation” in China, where digital governance has a more substantial impact on R&amp;D manipulation in economically developed areas. Our results also demonstrate that digital government transformation significantly improves the efficiency of governmental R&amp;D subsidies and the quality of firms' innovation outputs. Collectively, these findings indicate that digital transformation can amplify the effectiveness of industrial policies. Our study, therefore, contributes to the literature by offering theoretical perspectives and vital microeconomic evidence on how to optimize subsidy efficiency through the rapid development of big data and other cutting-edge digital technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 104106"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925001930","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exploiting a quasi-natural experiment in China in which the Big Data Administration was established in various cities across different times (i.e., pilot cities), we explore the role that digital government transformation plays in curbing firms' R&D manipulation activities. We rely on a staggered difference-in-differences research design and find that firms located in pilot cities significantly reduce the magnitude of their R&D manipulation from the pre- to the post- digital government transformation period, compared to firms located in nonpilot cities during the same time frame. Our analysis shows that digital government transformation mitigates R&D manipulation by strengthening government regulatory powers and normalizing corporate R&D practices. Additionally, we find that this impact is more pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises, manufacturing companies, smaller businesses, and those with less rigorous external oversight. Moreover, we identify a regulatory effect similar to “poverty alleviation” in China, where digital governance has a more substantial impact on R&D manipulation in economically developed areas. Our results also demonstrate that digital government transformation significantly improves the efficiency of governmental R&D subsidies and the quality of firms' innovation outputs. Collectively, these findings indicate that digital transformation can amplify the effectiveness of industrial policies. Our study, therefore, contributes to the literature by offering theoretical perspectives and vital microeconomic evidence on how to optimize subsidy efficiency through the rapid development of big data and other cutting-edge digital technologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字化政府转型的价值:来自中国R&D补贴效率的证据
通过在中国不同时期的不同城市(即试点城市)建立大数据管理局的准自然实验,我们探讨了数字化政府转型在遏制企业研发操纵活动中的作用。我们采用了交错差异研究设计,发现与非试点城市的企业相比,试点城市的企业在政府数字化转型前后的研发操纵程度显著降低。我们的分析表明,数字化政府转型通过加强政府监管权力和规范企业研发实践来减轻研发操纵。此外,我们发现这种影响在非国有企业、制造企业、小型企业和外部监督不太严格的企业中更为明显。此外,我们还发现了一种类似于中国“扶贫”的监管效应,在经济发达地区,数字治理对研发操纵的影响更大。研究结果还表明,数字化政府转型显著提高了政府研发补贴的效率和企业创新产出的质量。总的来说,这些发现表明,数字化转型可以放大产业政策的有效性。因此,我们的研究为如何通过大数据和其他尖端数字技术的快速发展来优化补贴效率提供了理论视角和重要的微观经济学证据,从而为文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Interlinkages between cryptocurrency classes and the hydrogen economy: New diversification insights from a partial correlation-based connectedness approach Unauthorized immigrants and corporate cash holdings The Crypto Risk Composite Index (CCRI)-advancing risk management in the digital asset space Crypto factor zoo (.Zip) Monetary policy surprises and the cross sectional stock return predictability in volume sorted portfolios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1