Being heard, restoring a social connection and decreasing anger: Adult patients’ perceptions of clinical services addressing violent extremism in Montreal, Canada

IF 2.6 Q1 PSYCHIATRY SSM. Mental health Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100427
Cécile Rousseau , Cindy Ngov , Samuel Veissière , Christian Desmarais , Tara Santavicca , Janique Johnson-Lafleur
{"title":"Being heard, restoring a social connection and decreasing anger: Adult patients’ perceptions of clinical services addressing violent extremism in Montreal, Canada","authors":"Cécile Rousseau ,&nbsp;Cindy Ngov ,&nbsp;Samuel Veissière ,&nbsp;Christian Desmarais ,&nbsp;Tara Santavicca ,&nbsp;Janique Johnson-Lafleur","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Growing social polarization and ideological radicalization contribute to an increased risk of violence, particularly among vulnerable individuals experiencing despair and marginalization. Understanding the subjective experiences of individuals involved in violent extremism (VE) can inform the development of effective clinical and social interventions that promote disengagement and reintegration. Despite increasing efforts to address VE through tertiary prevention programs, little research has examined how individuals perceive these interventions and their impact on well-being and social reintegration.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This qualitative study explores the perspectives of individuals receiving VE prevention services in Montreal, Canada. Using a phenomenological framework, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 participants (17 men and 1 woman; ages 17–72, mean = 32) referred by a specialized clinical team. Participation was voluntary, with confidentiality safeguards. Interviews were conducted in English or French, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically using an inductive coding approach.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Three key themes emerged. (1) Being Heard – Participants highlighted the therapeutic alliance, emphasizing the importance of being listened to without judgment and feeling respected by clinicians. (2) Restoring Social Connection – Engagement in services helped individuals re-establish social ties, navigate interpersonal conflicts, and reduce isolation. (3) Emotional Regulation and Decreased Anger – Participants reported improved emotional control, reduced distress, and a shift away from violent impulses. While some retained ideological beliefs, they no longer viewed violence as a viable option.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings highlight the role of clinical interventions in addressing social marginalization and distress among individuals at risk of VE. A trauma-informed, non-judgmental, and relationship-based approach appears central to fostering trust, reducing distress, and supporting disengagement. These results highlight the need for interdisciplinary models that integrate mental health, social services, and policy interventions to prevent violence and reintegrate individuals into society.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100427"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560325000398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Growing social polarization and ideological radicalization contribute to an increased risk of violence, particularly among vulnerable individuals experiencing despair and marginalization. Understanding the subjective experiences of individuals involved in violent extremism (VE) can inform the development of effective clinical and social interventions that promote disengagement and reintegration. Despite increasing efforts to address VE through tertiary prevention programs, little research has examined how individuals perceive these interventions and their impact on well-being and social reintegration.

Methods

This qualitative study explores the perspectives of individuals receiving VE prevention services in Montreal, Canada. Using a phenomenological framework, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 participants (17 men and 1 woman; ages 17–72, mean = 32) referred by a specialized clinical team. Participation was voluntary, with confidentiality safeguards. Interviews were conducted in English or French, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically using an inductive coding approach.

Findings

Three key themes emerged. (1) Being Heard – Participants highlighted the therapeutic alliance, emphasizing the importance of being listened to without judgment and feeling respected by clinicians. (2) Restoring Social Connection – Engagement in services helped individuals re-establish social ties, navigate interpersonal conflicts, and reduce isolation. (3) Emotional Regulation and Decreased Anger – Participants reported improved emotional control, reduced distress, and a shift away from violent impulses. While some retained ideological beliefs, they no longer viewed violence as a viable option.

Conclusions

The findings highlight the role of clinical interventions in addressing social marginalization and distress among individuals at risk of VE. A trauma-informed, non-judgmental, and relationship-based approach appears central to fostering trust, reducing distress, and supporting disengagement. These results highlight the need for interdisciplinary models that integrate mental health, social services, and policy interventions to prevent violence and reintegrate individuals into society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被倾听,恢复社会联系,减少愤怒:加拿大蒙特利尔成年患者对处理暴力极端主义的临床服务的看法
日益严重的社会两极分化和意识形态极端化导致暴力风险增加,特别是在经历绝望和边缘化的弱势群体中。了解参与暴力极端主义的个人的主观经历可以为制定有效的临床和社会干预措施提供信息,从而促进脱离接触和重新融入社会。尽管通过三级预防项目解决性侵问题的努力越来越多,但很少有研究调查个人如何看待这些干预措施及其对福祉和重返社会的影响。方法本定性研究探讨了加拿大蒙特利尔接受性侵预防服务的个体的观点。使用现象学框架,我们对18名参与者进行了半结构化访谈(17名男性和1名女性;年龄17-72岁,平均32岁,由专业临床小组转诊。参与是自愿的,有保密保障。访谈以英语或法语进行,逐字记录,并使用归纳编码方法进行主题分析。三个关键主题浮出水面。(1)倾听——参与者强调治疗联盟,强调被倾听的重要性,不加评判,感觉被临床医生尊重。(2)恢复社会联系——参与服务帮助个人重新建立社会联系,处理人际冲突,减少孤立。(3)情绪调节和减少愤怒——参与者报告情绪控制得到改善,痛苦减少,远离暴力冲动。虽然有些人保留了意识形态信仰,但他们不再认为暴力是一种可行的选择。结论:研究结果强调了临床干预在解决VE风险个体的社会边缘化和痛苦方面的作用。了解创伤、不评判和基于关系的方法似乎是培养信任、减少痛苦和支持脱离接触的核心。这些结果强调需要跨学科模式,将精神卫生、社会服务和政策干预结合起来,以防止暴力并使个人重新融入社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
期刊最新文献
Stigma and suicidal thoughts and behaviors among Black American emerging adults Mapping the costs of mental health- and substance use-related grant cancellations Development of the INDIGO partnership knowledge exchange strategy Critical and underrecognized home visitor competencies: Indigenous knowledge, culture, and self-determination in early childhood service delivery Threats and humiliation at the workplace and mental health among environmental scientists - a cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1