Clinical interpretation of DLCO and KCO: From rationale to clinical and research applications

IF 2 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Respiratory investigation Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.resinv.2025.02.007
Masafumi Yamamoto , Kaoruko Shimizu
{"title":"Clinical interpretation of DLCO and KCO: From rationale to clinical and research applications","authors":"Masafumi Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Kaoruko Shimizu","doi":"10.1016/j.resinv.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Single-breath methods for measuring the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DL<sub>CO</sub>), Krogh's constant for CO (K<sub>CO</sub>), and alveolar volume (V<sub>A</sub>) play clinically vital roles in assessing lung diffusion. While the methodology is valid for the kinetics of normal lungs, appropriate interpretations are necessary for lung diseases involving emphysema and/or ventilation heterogeneity. Severe airflow limitations and ventilation heterogeneities lead to the underestimation of lung volume, calculated as V<sub>A</sub>, relative to the total lung capacity assessed using the helium closed-circuit method. Notably, the relative increase in K<sub>CO</sub> (DL<sub>CO</sub>/V<sub>A</sub>) compared to DL<sub>CO</sub>—resulting from increased blood flow per alveolar–capillary unit in small lungs with fibrosis—is a distinct feature of interstitial lung disease. Therefore, the combined assessment of DL<sub>CO</sub> and K<sub>CO</sub> may help elucidate the pathophysiology of emphysema and/or pulmonary fibrosis. This review aims to explain Krogh's equation, the difference between DL<sub>CO</sub> and D’L<sub>CO</sub>, the kinetics, and the clinical application of DL<sub>CO</sub> (or D’L<sub>CO</sub>) and K<sub>CO</sub>. Pulmonary function varies among ethnicities and races; thus, reference equations derived while considering anthropological traits are necessary. Additionally, the link between physiological theory, radiological findings, and the clinical relevance of DL<sub>CO</sub> and K<sub>CO</sub> is discussed, mostly based on Japanese studies. In this review, DL<sub>CO</sub> obtained from the single-breath method is referred to as ”D’L<sub>CO</sub>”; however, for convenience, it is described as “DL<sub>CO</sub>,” with the term “D’L<sub>CO</sub>” used only where necessary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20934,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory investigation","volume":"63 3","pages":"Pages 358-364"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212534525000188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Single-breath methods for measuring the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), Krogh's constant for CO (KCO), and alveolar volume (VA) play clinically vital roles in assessing lung diffusion. While the methodology is valid for the kinetics of normal lungs, appropriate interpretations are necessary for lung diseases involving emphysema and/or ventilation heterogeneity. Severe airflow limitations and ventilation heterogeneities lead to the underestimation of lung volume, calculated as VA, relative to the total lung capacity assessed using the helium closed-circuit method. Notably, the relative increase in KCO (DLCO/VA) compared to DLCO—resulting from increased blood flow per alveolar–capillary unit in small lungs with fibrosis—is a distinct feature of interstitial lung disease. Therefore, the combined assessment of DLCO and KCO may help elucidate the pathophysiology of emphysema and/or pulmonary fibrosis. This review aims to explain Krogh's equation, the difference between DLCO and D’LCO, the kinetics, and the clinical application of DLCO (or D’LCO) and KCO. Pulmonary function varies among ethnicities and races; thus, reference equations derived while considering anthropological traits are necessary. Additionally, the link between physiological theory, radiological findings, and the clinical relevance of DLCO and KCO is discussed, mostly based on Japanese studies. In this review, DLCO obtained from the single-breath method is referred to as ”D’LCO”; however, for convenience, it is described as “DLCO,” with the term “D’LCO” used only where necessary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DLCO和KCO的临床解释:从理论基础到临床和研究应用
单次呼吸法测量肺部一氧化碳弥散能力(DLCO)、一氧化碳克罗常数(KCO)和肺泡容积(VA)在评估肺弥散方面发挥着重要的临床作用。虽然该方法对正常肺的动力学是有效的,但对涉及肺气肿和/或通气异质性的肺部疾病需要适当的解释。严重的气流限制和通气不均匀导致肺容积(以VA计算)相对于使用氦气闭路法评估的总肺活量被低估。值得注意的是,与DLCO相比,KCO (DLCO/VA)的相对增加是由纤维化小肺每肺泡毛细血管单位血流量增加引起的,这是间质性肺病的一个明显特征。因此,联合评估DLCO和KCO可能有助于阐明肺气肿和/或肺纤维化的病理生理。本文旨在解释Krogh方程,DLCO与D 'LCO的区别,DLCO(或D 'LCO)与KCO的动力学及其临床应用。不同民族和种族的肺功能不同;因此,在考虑人类学特征的同时推导参考方程是必要的。此外,主要基于日本的研究,讨论了DLCO和KCO的生理理论、放射学表现和临床相关性之间的联系。本文将单次呼吸法获得的DLCO简称为“D’lco”;然而,为了方便起见,它被描述为“DLCO”,术语“D’lco”仅在必要时使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory investigation
Respiratory investigation RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
64 days
期刊最新文献
The efficacy of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy for chronic progressive changes after remission of anti-MDA5 antibody-positive interstitial lung disease: a report of two cases. Are there differences in antigen recognition by mucosal-associated invariant T cells against mycobacterial infection and sarcoidosis? The causal relationship between bronchiectasis and non-tuberculous mycobacteria infections: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study and meta-analysis. Clinical characteristics of respiratory syncytial virus and human metapneumovirus pneumonia in adults: A multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan. Serum soluble ST2: An effective prognostic biomarker for mortality in patients with severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1