Dari version of International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ): In a sample of Afghan students

IF 1.9 Q3 PSYCHIATRY European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ejtd.2025.100528
Mohammad Sajjad Afsharzada , Sajjad Saadat , Basir Ahmad Azizi , Somaya Haqyar
{"title":"Dari version of International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ): In a sample of Afghan students","authors":"Mohammad Sajjad Afsharzada ,&nbsp;Sajjad Saadat ,&nbsp;Basir Ahmad Azizi ,&nbsp;Somaya Haqyar","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtd.2025.100528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) is a validated tool based on the 11th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) criteria for assessing Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD). While it is well-established, further validation is needed across diverse samples and broader psychopathological measures.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The present study aimed to retranslate and validate the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) in a sample of Afghan students. The present study was descriptive and validation-based.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The statistical population of this study was 227 undergraduate students at Herat University, Afghanistan, who were studying in the 2024–2025 academic year. In this study, students were selected using convenience sampling and completed an online survey (Qualtrics). To calculate test-retest reliability, 50 people were also selected and completed the ITQ within two weeks. In this study, the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) was administered.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Different models were tested for confirmatory factor analysis; the findings showed that the second-order six-factor model was the most appropriate model for ITQ in the present sample. Additionally, the ITQ exhibited high reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.86 and a test-retest reliability of 0.70 over two weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Given the strong psychometric properties of the Dari version of the International Trauma Questionnaire, it is a reliable tool for both research and clinical assessments. Its use is highly recommended for psychologists and mental health professionals in diagnostic and investigative contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":"9 2","pages":"Article 100528"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749925000304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) is a validated tool based on the 11th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) criteria for assessing Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD). While it is well-established, further validation is needed across diverse samples and broader psychopathological measures.

Objective

The present study aimed to retranslate and validate the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) in a sample of Afghan students. The present study was descriptive and validation-based.

Method

The statistical population of this study was 227 undergraduate students at Herat University, Afghanistan, who were studying in the 2024–2025 academic year. In this study, students were selected using convenience sampling and completed an online survey (Qualtrics). To calculate test-retest reliability, 50 people were also selected and completed the ITQ within two weeks. In this study, the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) was administered.

Results

Different models were tested for confirmatory factor analysis; the findings showed that the second-order six-factor model was the most appropriate model for ITQ in the present sample. Additionally, the ITQ exhibited high reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.86 and a test-retest reliability of 0.70 over two weeks.

Conclusion

Given the strong psychometric properties of the Dari version of the International Trauma Questionnaire, it is a reliable tool for both research and clinical assessments. Its use is highly recommended for psychologists and mental health professionals in diagnostic and investigative contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
达里语版国际创伤问卷 (ITQ):阿富汗学生样本
背景国际创伤问卷(ITQ)是根据第 11 版《国际疾病分类》(ICD-11)标准制定的一种经过验证的工具,用于评估创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)。本研究旨在重新翻译并在阿富汗学生样本中验证国际创伤问卷(ITQ)。本研究以描述和验证为基础。方法本研究的统计人群为阿富汗赫拉特大学 2024-2025 学年的 227 名本科生。本研究采用便利抽样法选取学生,并让他们填写在线调查问卷(Qualtrics)。为了计算重测可靠性,还选取了 50 人在两周内完成 ITQ。本研究采用了国际创伤问卷(ITQ)。结果对不同的模型进行了确认性因素分析测试;结果表明,在本样本中,二阶六因素模型是最适合 ITQ 的模型。此外,ITQ 还表现出较高的可靠性,其 Cronbach's alpha 值为 0.86,两周内的测试再测可靠性为 0.70。强烈建议心理学家和精神卫生专业人员在诊断和调查中使用该问卷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Beyond traumatic exposure: Prevalence of PTSD and the role of transdiagnostic processes among French civilian firefighters The Veil of Fantasy against the Wound of the Past: The role of control metacognitions, feared self, OCD symptoms and dissociation in linking emotional abuse and related emotions to maladaptive daydreaming in OCD Validation of the Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ) in a sample of Afghan students Childhood trauma, dissociative experiences and ADHD symptoms in youth Witnessing trauma: Professional erosion and the emotional burden on health providers in Gaza
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1