Spatial Analysis of Disadvantaged Population: A Case Study of Flood Exposure in the Itapocu River Basin, Brazil

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Flood Risk Management Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1111/jfr3.70031
Rafael Silva Araújo, Miho Ohara, Mamoru Miyamoto, Kuniyoshi Takeuchi
{"title":"Spatial Analysis of Disadvantaged Population: A Case Study of Flood Exposure in the Itapocu River Basin, Brazil","authors":"Rafael Silva Araújo,&nbsp;Miho Ohara,&nbsp;Mamoru Miyamoto,&nbsp;Kuniyoshi Takeuchi","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>People's vulnerability to disasters depends largely on their social and physical aspects, such as economic disadvantages and mobility constraints related to age. Those characteristics will influence how individuals experience the disaster and recover. Thus, assessing the vulnerable population's location and exposure to hazards such as floods is important for designing disaster risk reduction policies. This study conducts such an analysis considering five disadvantage dimensions: age, gender, race, socioeconomic status, and housing spatially distributed in cell grids, which were compiled into a disadvantage index (DI). The DI is further overlayed with the population density (DI*pop.dens.). From the derived DI*pop.dens. map, priority areas for flood management budget allocation can be extracted. The methodology is applied to the Itapocu River Basin (IRB), in southern Brazil, as a case study and compared with the flood inundation area estimated by a hydrological simulation. The places that could be regarded as priority areas for future public policy were classified into high, medium, and low-priority areas, considering higher exposure of the disadvantaged population, higher flood depth, and higher flood frequency. In the IRB, there are priority areas near the main urban areas. Thus, flood control budgets are suggested to be allocated there to protect the vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People's vulnerability to disasters depends largely on their social and physical aspects, such as economic disadvantages and mobility constraints related to age. Those characteristics will influence how individuals experience the disaster and recover. Thus, assessing the vulnerable population's location and exposure to hazards such as floods is important for designing disaster risk reduction policies. This study conducts such an analysis considering five disadvantage dimensions: age, gender, race, socioeconomic status, and housing spatially distributed in cell grids, which were compiled into a disadvantage index (DI). The DI is further overlayed with the population density (DI*pop.dens.). From the derived DI*pop.dens. map, priority areas for flood management budget allocation can be extracted. The methodology is applied to the Itapocu River Basin (IRB), in southern Brazil, as a case study and compared with the flood inundation area estimated by a hydrological simulation. The places that could be regarded as priority areas for future public policy were classified into high, medium, and low-priority areas, considering higher exposure of the disadvantaged population, higher flood depth, and higher flood frequency. In the IRB, there are priority areas near the main urban areas. Thus, flood control budgets are suggested to be allocated there to protect the vulnerable population.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人们对灾害的脆弱性在很大程度上取决于他们的社会和身体方面,如经济劣势和与年龄有关的行动限制。这些特征将影响个人如何经历灾难和恢复。因此,评估弱势人群的地理位置和遭受洪水等灾害的程度对于制定减少灾害风险的政策非常重要。本研究从年龄、性别、种族、社会经济地位和住房等五个不利条件维度进行了分析,并将其按单元网格空间分布,编制成不利条件指数(DI)。劣势指数与人口密度(DI*pop.dens.)进一步叠加。从得出的 DI*pop.dens. 地图中,可以提取出洪水管理预算分配的优先区域。该方法应用于巴西南部的伊塔波库河流域(IRB)作为案例研究,并与水文模拟估算的洪水淹没区进行比较。考虑到弱势群体的暴露程度较高、洪水深度较高和洪水频率较高,可被视为未来公共政策优先区域的地方被分为高、中、低三类。在 IRB 中,主要城区附近有优先区域。因此,建议将防洪预算分配到这些地区,以保护弱势群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Rainfall Forecasts and Flood Risk in a Coastal Urban Catchment Considering Different Urban Canopy Scenarios Spatial Analysis of Disadvantaged Population: A Case Study of Flood Exposure in the Itapocu River Basin, Brazil Looking Back and Looking Forward (Again) Measuring the Degree of ‘Fit’ Within Social-Ecological Systems to Support Local Flood Risk Decision-Making Artificial Neural Networks for Flood Prediction in Current and CMIP6 Climate Change Scenarios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1