Comparison of the Efficacy of 1064- and 730-nm Picosecond Lasers for Acquired Dermal Melanocytosis

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1111/jocd.70123
Kento Takaya, Kazuo Kishi
{"title":"Comparison of the Efficacy of 1064- and 730-nm Picosecond Lasers for Acquired Dermal Melanocytosis","authors":"Kento Takaya,&nbsp;Kazuo Kishi","doi":"10.1111/jocd.70123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Acquired dermal melanocytosis (ADM) is a pigmentary lesion caused by melanocytes in the dermis. These conditions are refractory, and a consensus on treatment remains elusive.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the efficacy of 730- and 1064-nm picosecond lasers in the treatment of ADM and to supplement the comparison with a literature review.</p>\n \n <p>Patients:</p>\n \n <p>We retrospectively examined patients who underwent picosecond laser therapy between April 2021 and February 2024. Treatments were performed three times with spot irradiation using a 730-nm laser (3-mm spot, 1.7–1.8 J/cm<sup>2</sup>; or 2-mm spot, 2.5–3.25 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) and a 1064-nm laser (3-mm spot, 3.1–4.0 J/cm<sup>2</sup>). Two months after each procedure, patient satisfaction was evaluated using questionnaires, macroscopic findings were assessed using photographs, and melanin accumulation was analyzed using skin analysis software. Evaluations were conducted on a 4-point scale (excellent, good, fair, and poor), with good or higher considered effective.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventy-eight and 83 patients were assigned to the 730- and 1064-nm groups, respectively. After three sessions, the 730-nm group exhibited superior outcomes in terms of subjective symptoms (patient satisfaction), objective findings, and software analysis improvements. The incidence of hyperpigmentation was 15.4% in the 1064-nm group and 14.5% in the 730-nm group, with no significant differences observed in the rates of other complications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The use of a 730-nm picosecond laser, which possesses high melanin selectivity, relatively deep penetration, and a short pulse width, suggests a potentially more effective treatment for ADM, compared to the effects of the conventional 1064-nm wavelength, without increasing complications.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","volume":"24 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jocd.70123","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.70123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Acquired dermal melanocytosis (ADM) is a pigmentary lesion caused by melanocytes in the dermis. These conditions are refractory, and a consensus on treatment remains elusive.

Aims

To compare the efficacy of 730- and 1064-nm picosecond lasers in the treatment of ADM and to supplement the comparison with a literature review.

Patients:

We retrospectively examined patients who underwent picosecond laser therapy between April 2021 and February 2024. Treatments were performed three times with spot irradiation using a 730-nm laser (3-mm spot, 1.7–1.8 J/cm2; or 2-mm spot, 2.5–3.25 J/cm2) and a 1064-nm laser (3-mm spot, 3.1–4.0 J/cm2). Two months after each procedure, patient satisfaction was evaluated using questionnaires, macroscopic findings were assessed using photographs, and melanin accumulation was analyzed using skin analysis software. Evaluations were conducted on a 4-point scale (excellent, good, fair, and poor), with good or higher considered effective.

Results

Seventy-eight and 83 patients were assigned to the 730- and 1064-nm groups, respectively. After three sessions, the 730-nm group exhibited superior outcomes in terms of subjective symptoms (patient satisfaction), objective findings, and software analysis improvements. The incidence of hyperpigmentation was 15.4% in the 1064-nm group and 14.5% in the 730-nm group, with no significant differences observed in the rates of other complications.

Conclusions

The use of a 730-nm picosecond laser, which possesses high melanin selectivity, relatively deep penetration, and a short pulse width, suggests a potentially more effective treatment for ADM, compared to the effects of the conventional 1064-nm wavelength, without increasing complications.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1064 nm和730 nm皮秒激光治疗获得性皮肤黑色素细胞增多症的疗效比较
背景:获得性真皮黑色素细胞增多症(ADM)是一种由真皮黑色素细胞引起的色素病变。这些情况是难治性的,对治疗的共识仍然难以捉摸。目的比较730 nm和1064 nm皮秒激光治疗ADM的疗效,并通过文献综述进行补充。患者:我们回顾性检查了2021年4月至2024年2月期间接受皮秒激光治疗的患者。采用730 nm激光(3-mm光斑,1.7-1.8 J/cm2;或2毫米光斑,2.5-3.25 J/cm2)和1064纳米激光器(3毫米光斑,3.1-4.0 J/cm2)。每次手术后两个月,通过问卷评估患者满意度,通过照片评估宏观结果,并使用皮肤分析软件分析黑色素积累。评估以4分制进行(优秀、良好、一般和差),良好或更高被认为有效。结果730 nm组78例,1064 nm组83例。三个疗程后,730nm组在主观症状(患者满意度)、客观结果和软件分析改进方面表现出更好的结果。1064 nm组色素沉着的发生率为15.4%,730 nm组为14.5%,其他并发症发生率无显著差异。结论730 nm皮秒激光具有较高的黑色素选择性、较深的穿透性和较短的脉冲宽度,与传统的1064 nm波长相比,可能更有效地治疗ADM,且不会增加并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
818
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology publishes high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cosmetic dermatology with the aim to foster the highest standards of patient care in cosmetic dermatology. Published quarterly, the Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology facilitates continuing professional development and provides a forum for the exchange of scientific research and innovative techniques. The scope of coverage includes, but will not be limited to: healthy skin; skin maintenance; ageing skin; photodamage and photoprotection; rejuvenation; biochemistry, endocrinology and neuroimmunology of healthy skin; imaging; skin measurement; quality of life; skin types; sensitive skin; rosacea and acne; sebum; sweat; fat; phlebology; hair conservation, restoration and removal; nails and nail surgery; pigment; psychological and medicolegal issues; retinoids; cosmetic chemistry; dermopharmacy; cosmeceuticals; toiletries; striae; cellulite; cosmetic dermatological surgery; blepharoplasty; liposuction; surgical complications; botulinum; fillers, peels and dermabrasion; local and tumescent anaesthesia; electrosurgery; lasers, including laser physics, laser research and safety, vascular lasers, pigment lasers, hair removal lasers, tattoo removal lasers, resurfacing lasers, dermal remodelling lasers and laser complications.
期刊最新文献
Cross-Cultural Beliefs and Stigmatization in Vitiligo: A Systematic Review. Comment on "Post-Botulinum Headache in Cosmetic Practice: A Prospective Study". A Case Series on a Layered Biomaterial Strategy for Midface Rejuvenation: Combining Collagen Stimulators and Hyaluronic Acid. Comment on "Efficacy and Safety of Combined Platelet-Rich Plasma With Fractional Laser for Adult Patients With Vitiligo: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials". Treatment of Melasma Targeting Dermal-Epidermal Interactions Utilizing High-Intensity, High-Frequency Parallel Ultrasound Beam in Asian Skin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1