Brain Organoid Research in a Post-Dobbs World

Q2 Social Sciences Ethics & human research Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1002/eahr.60017
Christine N. Coughlin, Nancy M. P. King, Emily McEwan
{"title":"Brain Organoid Research in a Post-Dobbs World","authors":"Christine N. Coughlin,&nbsp;Nancy M. P. King,&nbsp;Emily McEwan","doi":"10.1002/eahr.60017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The creation and study of brain organoids may hold significant promise for understanding brain functions, disorders, and diseases. This research may also raise novel considerations and ethical concerns, but it has significant public and professional support when thoughtfully undertaken. Current legislative and judicial restrictions on abortion and pronouncements about fetal personhood could, however, have a surprisingly broad and unintended reach, even conceivably restricting the development and use of brain organoids and other biomedical and bioengineered research tools. Brain organoid research thus may constitute a cautionary tale about the risks of performative policy-making.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"47 2","pages":"41-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & human research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.60017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The creation and study of brain organoids may hold significant promise for understanding brain functions, disorders, and diseases. This research may also raise novel considerations and ethical concerns, but it has significant public and professional support when thoughtfully undertaken. Current legislative and judicial restrictions on abortion and pronouncements about fetal personhood could, however, have a surprisingly broad and unintended reach, even conceivably restricting the development and use of brain organoids and other biomedical and bioengineered research tools. Brain organoid research thus may constitute a cautionary tale about the risks of performative policy-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后多布斯时代的脑类器官研究
脑类器官的创造和研究可能为理解大脑功能、紊乱和疾病带来重大希望。这项研究也可能引起新的考虑和伦理问题,但如果进行得周到,它会得到重要的公众和专业支持。然而,目前对堕胎和胎儿人格声明的立法和司法限制可能会产生出乎意料的广泛和意想不到的影响,甚至可能会限制脑类器官和其他生物医学和生物工程研究工具的开发和使用。因此,脑类器官的研究可能构成一个关于行为决策风险的警示故事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics & human research
Ethics & human research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Human Research Protection Training Requirements: Alternatives for Community Researchers at CTSA-Funded Research Institutions Challenges of Conducting Risk-Benefit Analysis of Early Phase Clinical Trials: Results of a National Survey of IRB Chairs Troubling Hope: Religious Faith and False Hope in Clinical Research Participants Navigating Challenges with IRB Review for Community-Engaged Research with Transgender Youth in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1