Maximizing Immunopeptidomics-Based Bacterial Epitope Discovery by Multiple Search Engines and Rescoring.

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of Proteome Research Pub Date : 2025-04-04 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00864
Patrick Willems, Fabien Thery, Laura Van Moortel, Margaux De Meyer, An Staes, Adillah Gul, Lyudmila Kovalchuke, Arthur Declercq, Robbe Devreese, Robbin Bouwmeester, Ralf Gabriels, Lennart Martens, Francis Impens
{"title":"Maximizing Immunopeptidomics-Based Bacterial Epitope Discovery by Multiple Search Engines and Rescoring.","authors":"Patrick Willems, Fabien Thery, Laura Van Moortel, Margaux De Meyer, An Staes, Adillah Gul, Lyudmila Kovalchuke, Arthur Declercq, Robbe Devreese, Robbin Bouwmeester, Ralf Gabriels, Lennart Martens, Francis Impens","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mass spectrometry-based discovery of bacterial immunopeptides presented by infected cells allows untargeted discovery of bacterial antigens that can serve as vaccine candidates. However, reliable identification of bacterial epitopes is challenged by their extremely low abundance. Here, we describe an optimized bioinformatic framework to enhance the confident identification of bacterial immunopeptides. Immunopeptidomics data of cell cultures infected with <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> were searched by four different search engines, PEAKS, Comet, Sage and MSFragger, followed by data-driven rescoring with MS<sup>2</sup>Rescore. Compared with individual search engine results, this integrated workflow boosted immunopeptide identification by an average of 27% and led to the high-confidence detection of 18 additional bacterial peptides (+27%) matching 15 different <i>Listeria</i> proteins (+36%). Despite the strong agreement between the search engines, a small number of spectra (<1%) had ambiguous matches to multiple peptides and were excluded to ensure high-confidence identifications. Finally, we demonstrate our workflow with sensitive timsTOF SCP data acquisition and find that rescoring, now with inclusion of ion mobility features, identifies 76% more peptides compared to Q Exactive HF acquisition. Together, our results demonstrate how integration of multiple search engine results along with data-driven rescoring maximizes immunopeptide identification, boosting the detection of high-confidence bacterial epitopes for vaccine development.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":" ","pages":"2141-2151"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11976845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00864","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mass spectrometry-based discovery of bacterial immunopeptides presented by infected cells allows untargeted discovery of bacterial antigens that can serve as vaccine candidates. However, reliable identification of bacterial epitopes is challenged by their extremely low abundance. Here, we describe an optimized bioinformatic framework to enhance the confident identification of bacterial immunopeptides. Immunopeptidomics data of cell cultures infected with Listeria monocytogenes were searched by four different search engines, PEAKS, Comet, Sage and MSFragger, followed by data-driven rescoring with MS2Rescore. Compared with individual search engine results, this integrated workflow boosted immunopeptide identification by an average of 27% and led to the high-confidence detection of 18 additional bacterial peptides (+27%) matching 15 different Listeria proteins (+36%). Despite the strong agreement between the search engines, a small number of spectra (<1%) had ambiguous matches to multiple peptides and were excluded to ensure high-confidence identifications. Finally, we demonstrate our workflow with sensitive timsTOF SCP data acquisition and find that rescoring, now with inclusion of ion mobility features, identifies 76% more peptides compared to Q Exactive HF acquisition. Together, our results demonstrate how integration of multiple search engine results along with data-driven rescoring maximizes immunopeptide identification, boosting the detection of high-confidence bacterial epitopes for vaccine development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用多种搜索引擎和评分最大化基于免疫肽的细菌表位发现。
以质谱为基础的细菌免疫肽的发现是由感染细胞呈递的,它允许非靶向地发现可以作为候选疫苗的细菌抗原。然而,细菌表位的可靠鉴定受到其极低丰度的挑战。在这里,我们描述了一个优化的生物信息学框架,以提高细菌免疫肽的自信鉴定。通过4个不同的搜索引擎(PEAKS、Comet、Sage和MSFragger)检索单核增生李斯特菌感染细胞培养物的免疫肽组学数据,然后使用MS2Rescore进行数据驱动评分。与单个搜索引擎结果相比,该集成工作流程将免疫肽鉴定平均提高了27%,并导致18个额外的细菌肽(+27%)的高可信度检测,这些细菌肽与15种不同的李斯特菌蛋白(+36%)相匹配。尽管搜索引擎之间有很强的一致性,但少数光谱(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Proteome Research
Journal of Proteome Research 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
251
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive Lysine Ubiquitome Profiling Reveals Diverse Functions of Lysine Ubiquitination in Eimeria tenella. Salivary Proteomics Reveals Oxidative Markers in E-Cigarette Users. Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Exploring the Impact of Two DNA Minor Groove Binder Compounds on HCT-116 Cells: A Comprehensive Multiomics Analysis Using Mass Spectrometry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1