Enhancing the transformative potential of sustainability innovations: An application of the values-rules-knowledge framework

IF 5.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Ambio Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1007/s13280-025-02148-2
Caroline Hélène Dabard, Carsten Mann, Berta Martín-López
{"title":"Enhancing the transformative potential of sustainability innovations: An application of the values-rules-knowledge framework","authors":"Caroline Hélène Dabard,&nbsp;Carsten Mann,&nbsp;Berta Martín-López","doi":"10.1007/s13280-025-02148-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To respond to global sustainability challenges with transformative solutions, there is a need to pinpoint the necessary and sufficient conditions that enhance the transformative potential of sustainability innovations. To this end, we examined 129 sustainability innovations in two European Biosphere Reserves, and analysed (1) their transformative potential, assessed based on a leverage points perspective, and (2) their supportive conditions (i.e. decision contexts, or constellations of values, rules and knowledge). Specifically, we used social network analyses to characterise different rules, or governance arrangements in the two Biosphere Reserves. By comparing the decision contexts of transformative and incremental innovations, we provide empirical evidence that plural values, coproduction and networks that are diverse, collaborative and influential, enable transformative innovations. Shallow leverage points seem insufficient but necessary to operationalise transformative change. Future research should explore the co-evolution of decision contexts and transformative potential, to better understand how to shift incremental to transformative innovations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":"54 7","pages":"1250 - 1266"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambio","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13280-025-02148-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To respond to global sustainability challenges with transformative solutions, there is a need to pinpoint the necessary and sufficient conditions that enhance the transformative potential of sustainability innovations. To this end, we examined 129 sustainability innovations in two European Biosphere Reserves, and analysed (1) their transformative potential, assessed based on a leverage points perspective, and (2) their supportive conditions (i.e. decision contexts, or constellations of values, rules and knowledge). Specifically, we used social network analyses to characterise different rules, or governance arrangements in the two Biosphere Reserves. By comparing the decision contexts of transformative and incremental innovations, we provide empirical evidence that plural values, coproduction and networks that are diverse, collaborative and influential, enable transformative innovations. Shallow leverage points seem insufficient but necessary to operationalise transformative change. Future research should explore the co-evolution of decision contexts and transformative potential, to better understand how to shift incremental to transformative innovations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增强可持续创新的变革潜力:价值-规则-知识框架的应用。
为了以变革性的解决方案应对全球可持续性挑战,有必要确定增强可持续性创新变革潜力的必要和充分条件。为此,我们研究了两个欧洲生物圈保护区的129项可持续创新,并分析了(1)它们的变革潜力(基于杠杆点的角度进行评估)和(2)它们的支持条件(即决策环境,或价值观、规则和知识的组合)。具体来说,我们使用社会网络分析来描述两个生物圈保护区的不同规则或治理安排。通过比较变革性创新和渐进式创新的决策背景,我们提供了经验证据,证明多元价值观、合作生产和多样化、协作和有影响力的网络能够实现变革性创新。肤浅的杠杆点似乎不够,但对于实施转型变革是必要的。未来的研究应探索决策环境和变革潜力的共同演化,以更好地理解如何将渐进式创新转变为变革式创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ambio
Ambio 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
123
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Explores the link between anthropogenic activities and the environment, Ambio encourages multi- or interdisciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. Ambio addresses the scientific, social, economic, and cultural factors that influence the condition of the human environment. Ambio particularly encourages multi- or inter-disciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. For more than 45 years Ambio has brought international perspective to important developments in environmental research, policy and related activities for an international readership of specialists, generalists, students, decision-makers and interested laymen.
期刊最新文献
From the Gobi to the Sahel: Can China's anti-desertification model work in Africa? Navigating complexity: A guide and tools for interdisciplinary research on lower-carbon practices. How is energy poverty linked with citizen perceptions of financial support for low-carbon housing? A golden opportunity: Corporate sustainability reporting as a key lever to address nature-related risks. Mapping biocultural diversity: An integrative spatial approach to inform conservation and management decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1