Mapping Perioperative Care Randomized Controlled Trials in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesia and analgesia Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000007460
Laila Collier, Ameer S-J Hohlfeld, Bruce M Biccard
{"title":"Mapping Perioperative Care Randomized Controlled Trials in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Laila Collier, Ameer S-J Hohlfeld, Bruce M Biccard","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The World Health Organization has recognized surgical and anesthesia care as integral components of universal health coverage. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), 93% of the population lacks access to essential surgical services. Postsurgery mortality in Africa is double the global average. The involvement of anesthesia providers is crucial for improved outcomes. Perioperative research can produce context-specific solutions to challenges faced in the perioperative period. SSA conducts fewer randomized controlled trials (RCTs) than high-income countries, limiting its contribution to global evidence. Our primary objectives were to document the geographical distribution of included RCTs, describe their characteristics, and evaluate the reporting quality using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)-2010 checklist. We followed the PRISMA Scoping Reviews (PRISMAScR) Checklist. We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus. We identified perioperative care RCTs within SSA published from 2000 to 2022. Two independent reviewers screened potential studies and extracted data in duplicate, with disagreements resolved through consensus or a third reviewer. Quantitative analysis was done with STATA 16, and data were summarized narratively. We compared RCT quality pre-CONSORT-2010 to post-CONSORT-2010, using Pearson's χ2 test or Fisher exact test (as applicable), considering P < .05 as statistically significant. Of 3319 records, 169 eligible RCTs were identified, randomizing 45,376 participants, with a mean sample size of 98. Between the years 2000 and 2022, there was an exponential trend towards an increasing number of RCTs in SSA (y = 1,5619e0,1051x). The RCTs were from 16 countries in SSA. Most studies were single-country, single-center, led by authors from Nigeria (63/169, 37.3 %) and South Africa (41/169, 24.3%). Most interventions were conducted intraoperatively (n = 125/169, 74%). Pharmacotherapy interventions were most investigated (n = 64/169, 37.9%), followed by analgesic interventions (n = 42/169, 24.9%). The surgical discipline most investigated was obstetrics (n = 51/169, 30.2%). The reporting quality was generally poor, with most RCTs not adhering to CONSORT guidelines and failing to register on a trial registry. This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of perioperative care RCTs in SSA, highlighting limitations such as small sample sizes, under-representation of high surgical burden disciplines, and poor outcome reporting. Clinical trial capacity is limited to a few countries and institutions, and methodological quality remains poor despite reporting guidelines. There is an opportunity to enhance context-appropriate RCTs in SSA by prioritizing high-quality research through collaborative efforts. Our findings serve as a resource for researchers, funders, and policymakers in perioperative care research in Africa to improve future RCT designs and reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007460","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The World Health Organization has recognized surgical and anesthesia care as integral components of universal health coverage. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), 93% of the population lacks access to essential surgical services. Postsurgery mortality in Africa is double the global average. The involvement of anesthesia providers is crucial for improved outcomes. Perioperative research can produce context-specific solutions to challenges faced in the perioperative period. SSA conducts fewer randomized controlled trials (RCTs) than high-income countries, limiting its contribution to global evidence. Our primary objectives were to document the geographical distribution of included RCTs, describe their characteristics, and evaluate the reporting quality using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)-2010 checklist. We followed the PRISMA Scoping Reviews (PRISMAScR) Checklist. We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus. We identified perioperative care RCTs within SSA published from 2000 to 2022. Two independent reviewers screened potential studies and extracted data in duplicate, with disagreements resolved through consensus or a third reviewer. Quantitative analysis was done with STATA 16, and data were summarized narratively. We compared RCT quality pre-CONSORT-2010 to post-CONSORT-2010, using Pearson's χ2 test or Fisher exact test (as applicable), considering P < .05 as statistically significant. Of 3319 records, 169 eligible RCTs were identified, randomizing 45,376 participants, with a mean sample size of 98. Between the years 2000 and 2022, there was an exponential trend towards an increasing number of RCTs in SSA (y = 1,5619e0,1051x). The RCTs were from 16 countries in SSA. Most studies were single-country, single-center, led by authors from Nigeria (63/169, 37.3 %) and South Africa (41/169, 24.3%). Most interventions were conducted intraoperatively (n = 125/169, 74%). Pharmacotherapy interventions were most investigated (n = 64/169, 37.9%), followed by analgesic interventions (n = 42/169, 24.9%). The surgical discipline most investigated was obstetrics (n = 51/169, 30.2%). The reporting quality was generally poor, with most RCTs not adhering to CONSORT guidelines and failing to register on a trial registry. This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of perioperative care RCTs in SSA, highlighting limitations such as small sample sizes, under-representation of high surgical burden disciplines, and poor outcome reporting. Clinical trial capacity is limited to a few countries and institutions, and methodological quality remains poor despite reporting guidelines. There is an opportunity to enhance context-appropriate RCTs in SSA by prioritizing high-quality research through collaborative efforts. Our findings serve as a resource for researchers, funders, and policymakers in perioperative care research in Africa to improve future RCT designs and reporting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
期刊最新文献
Curb Appeal and Fellowship Training: How Can We Improve? In Response. Artificial Intelligence Supporting Anesthesiology Clinical Decision-Making. Bridging the Gap: The Challenge of Conducting Clinical Trials in Sub-Saharan Africa. Mapping Perioperative Care Randomized Controlled Trials in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1