Establishing a Threshold of Impairment to Define Preoperative Coronal Malalignment in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Spine Surgery Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001792
Scott L Zuckerman, Fthimnir M Hassan, Christopher S Lai, Yong Shen, Mena Kerolus, Alex Ha, Ian Buchannan, Meghan Cerpa, Nathan J Lee, Zeeshan M Sardar, Ronald A Lehman, Lawrence G Lenke
{"title":"Establishing a Threshold of Impairment to Define Preoperative Coronal Malalignment in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.","authors":"Scott L Zuckerman, Fthimnir M Hassan, Christopher S Lai, Yong Shen, Mena Kerolus, Alex Ha, Ian Buchannan, Meghan Cerpa, Nathan J Lee, Zeeshan M Sardar, Ronald A Lehman, Lawrence G Lenke","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Single-center retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish an empirically derived threshold to define both coronal and sagittal malalignment (CM & SM) based on preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Currently, no radiographic alignment threshold defines preoperative CM in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients based on disability. In a cohort of ASD patients undergoing corrective surgery, we sought to establish a threshold to define both CM and SM based on PRO and assess the clinical impact of CM and combined with SM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ASD patients with ≥6 level fusions were included. CVA and SVA were measured. PROs included preoperative ODI and SRS-22r scores. CVA and SVA thresholds were derived to accurately differentiate patients with ODI >40 and SRS-pain+function <5. Patients were then separated into 4 groups: (1) neutral alignment (NA); (2) CM; (3) SM; and (4) combined coronal and sagittal malalignment (CCSM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally, 368 patients were included. Thresholds to distinguish patients with ODI ≥40 and SRS-pain/function <5 were: (1) CVA=3.96 cm (ODI) and 3.17 cm (SRS); (2) SVA=4.97 cm (ODI) and 7.52 cm (SRS). The lower numbers were chosen to define each threshold: CVA=3 cm and SVA=5 cm. Alignment breakdown was: NA=179 (48.6%), CM=66 (17.9%), SM=65 (17.7%), and CCSM=58 (15.8%). Both SM=( P =0.006) and CCSM ( P <0.001) patients had significantly worse ODI scores than NA patients, and CCSM patients were significantly worse than SM alone ( P =0.010). On the basis of preoperative total SRS-22r scores, only CCSM ( P =0.003) patients were significantly worse than the NA group. CVA significantly correlated with 4/7 (57.1%) preoperative PROs (ODI/SRS-total/function/image), while SVA correlated with 5/7 (71.4%) preoperative PROs (ODI/SRS-total/function/image/pain). A linear relationship was seen between increasing CVA and worsening ODI (β=0.92, 95% CI: 0.37-1.48, P =0.001). A significant and slightly stronger relationship was seen between increasing SVA and worsening ODI (β=1.28, 95% CI: 1.00-1.56, P <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CM and SM thresholds that accurately distinguished ASD patients with severe pain and disability preoperatively were 3 cm for CVA and 5 cm for SVA, respectively. Preoperative CM was significantly associated with worse ODI, SRS-22r total/function/image scores. CCSM led to more disability than SM alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"E541-E548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001792","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Single-center retrospective analysis.

Objective: To establish an empirically derived threshold to define both coronal and sagittal malalignment (CM & SM) based on preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Summary of background data: Currently, no radiographic alignment threshold defines preoperative CM in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients based on disability. In a cohort of ASD patients undergoing corrective surgery, we sought to establish a threshold to define both CM and SM based on PRO and assess the clinical impact of CM and combined with SM.

Methods: ASD patients with ≥6 level fusions were included. CVA and SVA were measured. PROs included preoperative ODI and SRS-22r scores. CVA and SVA thresholds were derived to accurately differentiate patients with ODI >40 and SRS-pain+function <5. Patients were then separated into 4 groups: (1) neutral alignment (NA); (2) CM; (3) SM; and (4) combined coronal and sagittal malalignment (CCSM).

Results: Totally, 368 patients were included. Thresholds to distinguish patients with ODI ≥40 and SRS-pain/function <5 were: (1) CVA=3.96 cm (ODI) and 3.17 cm (SRS); (2) SVA=4.97 cm (ODI) and 7.52 cm (SRS). The lower numbers were chosen to define each threshold: CVA=3 cm and SVA=5 cm. Alignment breakdown was: NA=179 (48.6%), CM=66 (17.9%), SM=65 (17.7%), and CCSM=58 (15.8%). Both SM=( P =0.006) and CCSM ( P <0.001) patients had significantly worse ODI scores than NA patients, and CCSM patients were significantly worse than SM alone ( P =0.010). On the basis of preoperative total SRS-22r scores, only CCSM ( P =0.003) patients were significantly worse than the NA group. CVA significantly correlated with 4/7 (57.1%) preoperative PROs (ODI/SRS-total/function/image), while SVA correlated with 5/7 (71.4%) preoperative PROs (ODI/SRS-total/function/image/pain). A linear relationship was seen between increasing CVA and worsening ODI (β=0.92, 95% CI: 0.37-1.48, P =0.001). A significant and slightly stronger relationship was seen between increasing SVA and worsening ODI (β=1.28, 95% CI: 1.00-1.56, P <0.001).

Conclusions: CM and SM thresholds that accurately distinguished ASD patients with severe pain and disability preoperatively were 3 cm for CVA and 5 cm for SVA, respectively. Preoperative CM was significantly associated with worse ODI, SRS-22r total/function/image scores. CCSM led to more disability than SM alone.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立损伤阈值以确定成人脊柱畸形患者术前冠状位不对准。
研究设计:单中心回顾性分析。目的:根据术前患者报告的结果(PROs)建立一个经验衍生的阈值来定义冠状和矢状面排列失调(CM & SM)。背景资料总结:目前,没有基于残疾的成人脊柱畸形(ASD)患者术前CM的放射学对齐阈值。在一组接受矫正手术的ASD患者中,我们试图建立一个基于PRO来定义CM和SM的阈值,并评估CM和联合SM的临床影响。方法:纳入融合程度≥6级的ASD患者。测量CVA和SVA。PROs包括术前ODI和SRS-22r评分。得出CVA和SVA阈值,准确区分ODI bbb40和SRS-pain+功能患者。结果:共纳入368例患者。结论:CVA和SVA的CM和SM阈值分别为3 CM和5 CM,可准确区分术前重度疼痛和残疾的ASD患者。术前CM与较差的ODI、SRS-22r总分/功能/影像评分显著相关。CCSM比单独SM导致更多的残疾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
期刊最新文献
Implant Migration After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review. Postoperative Footdrop Following Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Associated Complications. Adoption of Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A 6-Year National Utilization Analysis. Radiation Exposure and Dose Estimates of Robot-Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Spinal Fusion: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Utility of Preoperative Whole-Body Imaging in Candidates for Lumbar Spine Surgery: The Impact of Concomitant Lower Extremity Osteoarthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1