Synthesizing Genotoxicity Results in the MultiFlow Assay With Point-of-Departure Analysis and ToxPi Visualization Techniques

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1002/em.70003
Yusuf Hussien, Stephen D. Dertinger, George E. Johnson
{"title":"Synthesizing Genotoxicity Results in the MultiFlow Assay With Point-of-Departure Analysis and ToxPi Visualization Techniques","authors":"Yusuf Hussien,&nbsp;Stephen D. Dertinger,&nbsp;George E. Johnson","doi":"10.1002/em.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In vitro genotoxicity has historically served a hazard identification role, with simple binary outcomes provided for each of several single endpoint assays. This will need to change, given: (i) efforts to curtail animal testing, (ii) the increased use of multiplexed in vitro assays and the ongoing development of NAMS, and (iii) the desire to holistically consider quantitative results from multiple biomarkers/endpoints that take potency into consideration. To help facilitate more quantitative analyses of multiple biomarkers and/or assay streams, we explored the combined use of PROAST and Toxicological Prioritization Index (ToxPi) software. As a proofofconcept, this investigation employed the MultiFlow DNA damage assay, focusing on γH2AX and p53 biomarkers at two time points, whereby 10 genotoxicants were evaluated in the presence and absence of rat liver S9 metabolic activation. Whereas PROAST was used to calculate BMD point estimates and confidence intervals (CIs), ToxPi synthesized the BMD results into visual, quantitative summaries conveying genotoxicity and metabolic properties. Our analyses suggest that ToxPi's data synthesis and visualization modules provide useful insights into compound response, chemical grouping, and genotoxic mechanisms. By integrating multiple data sources, we find that ToxPi offers a powerful complementary approach to traditional BMD CI graphs, particularly for the simultaneous analysis of multiple biomarkers, enhancing chemical potency analysis of complex datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":11791,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","volume":"66 3","pages":"122-133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/em.70003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/em.70003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In vitro genotoxicity has historically served a hazard identification role, with simple binary outcomes provided for each of several single endpoint assays. This will need to change, given: (i) efforts to curtail animal testing, (ii) the increased use of multiplexed in vitro assays and the ongoing development of NAMS, and (iii) the desire to holistically consider quantitative results from multiple biomarkers/endpoints that take potency into consideration. To help facilitate more quantitative analyses of multiple biomarkers and/or assay streams, we explored the combined use of PROAST and Toxicological Prioritization Index (ToxPi) software. As a proofofconcept, this investigation employed the MultiFlow DNA damage assay, focusing on γH2AX and p53 biomarkers at two time points, whereby 10 genotoxicants were evaluated in the presence and absence of rat liver S9 metabolic activation. Whereas PROAST was used to calculate BMD point estimates and confidence intervals (CIs), ToxPi synthesized the BMD results into visual, quantitative summaries conveying genotoxicity and metabolic properties. Our analyses suggest that ToxPi's data synthesis and visualization modules provide useful insights into compound response, chemical grouping, and genotoxic mechanisms. By integrating multiple data sources, we find that ToxPi offers a powerful complementary approach to traditional BMD CI graphs, particularly for the simultaneous analysis of multiple biomarkers, enhancing chemical potency analysis of complex datasets.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用出发点分析和ToxPi可视化技术合成多流分析的遗传毒性结果。
体外遗传毒性在历史上一直是一种危险识别作用,为几个单终点分析提供了简单的二元结果。考虑到:(i)减少动物试验的努力,(ii)体外多重检测的使用增加和NAMS的持续发展,以及(iii)考虑效力的多种生物标志物/终点的整体定量结果的愿望,这种情况需要改变。为了方便对多种生物标志物和/或分析流进行更多的定量分析,我们探索了PROAST和毒理学优先排序指数(ToxPi)软件的联合使用。为了验证这一概念,本研究采用了MultiFlow DNA损伤试验,重点关注两个时间点的γ - h2ax和p53生物标志物,在存在和不存在大鼠肝脏S9代谢激活的情况下评估了10种基因毒物。PROAST用于计算骨密度点估计值和置信区间(ci),而ToxPi将骨密度结果合成为可视化、定量的摘要,传达遗传毒性和代谢特性。我们的分析表明,ToxPi的数据合成和可视化模块为化合物反应、化学分组和遗传毒性机制提供了有用的见解。通过整合多个数据源,我们发现ToxPi为传统的BMD CI图提供了一个强大的补充方法,特别是对于多个生物标志物的同时分析,增强了复杂数据集的化学效力分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis publishes original research manuscripts, reviews and commentaries on topics related to six general areas, with an emphasis on subject matter most suited for the readership of EMM as outlined below. The journal is intended for investigators in fields such as molecular biology, biochemistry, microbiology, genetics and epigenetics, genomics and epigenomics, cancer research, neurobiology, heritable mutation, radiation biology, toxicology, and molecular & environmental epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
The In Vitro Transgenic Rodent Assay in Primary MutaMouse Hepatocytes Compared to the Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Assay Using the HPRT Gene. Identification of Most Stably Expressed Internal Control Genes for Normalization of Target Gene Expression in Buffalo Skin Tissue. Meta-Analysis of CYP1A1 MspI and Ile462Val Polymorphisms in Cancer Susceptibility Among Different Ethnic Populations. Issue Information Assessing the quality and making appropriate use of historical negative control data: A report of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1