Applying quality improvement methods to reduce antibiotic use in neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2025-05-02 DOI:10.1093/jac/dkaf078
Bo Wang, Na Wang, Zhangbin Yu, Jia Zhang
{"title":"Applying quality improvement methods to reduce antibiotic use in neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bo Wang, Na Wang, Zhangbin Yu, Jia Zhang","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to explore effective interventions and observation indicators for reducing antibiotic use in neonates through quality improvement (QI) methods, while quantitatively analysing whether these methods increase the risk of neonatal mortality and serious adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By 27 August 2024, we reviewed all pertinent literature. A descriptive statistical analysis was conducted on all intervention measures, outcome indicators, process indicators, and balance indicators. The group utilizing QI interventions was designated as the intervention group, with the baseline period serving as the control group. The mortality rates and incidence of serious adverse outcomes were treated as dichotomous variables. The risk ratio (RR) and 95% CIs were effect indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 57 studies published between 2016 and 2024 were included. All studies were uncontrolled before-and-after studies. The most studied country was the United States of America. From these 57 studies, 27 effective intervention measures were identified, and all observation indicators and main results were presented in tabular form. According to the meta-analysis, the mortality rate in the intervention group decreased by 30% compared with the control group (RR = 0.7; 95% CI: 0.604-0.81; P < 0.001), while there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of serious adverse outcomes between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>QI methods can safely and effectively reduce the use of antibiotics in neonates, highlighting their potential for clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1185-1196"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to explore effective interventions and observation indicators for reducing antibiotic use in neonates through quality improvement (QI) methods, while quantitatively analysing whether these methods increase the risk of neonatal mortality and serious adverse outcomes.

Methods: By 27 August 2024, we reviewed all pertinent literature. A descriptive statistical analysis was conducted on all intervention measures, outcome indicators, process indicators, and balance indicators. The group utilizing QI interventions was designated as the intervention group, with the baseline period serving as the control group. The mortality rates and incidence of serious adverse outcomes were treated as dichotomous variables. The risk ratio (RR) and 95% CIs were effect indicators.

Results: In total, 57 studies published between 2016 and 2024 were included. All studies were uncontrolled before-and-after studies. The most studied country was the United States of America. From these 57 studies, 27 effective intervention measures were identified, and all observation indicators and main results were presented in tabular form. According to the meta-analysis, the mortality rate in the intervention group decreased by 30% compared with the control group (RR = 0.7; 95% CI: 0.604-0.81; P < 0.001), while there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of serious adverse outcomes between the two groups.

Conclusions: QI methods can safely and effectively reduce the use of antibiotics in neonates, highlighting their potential for clinical applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用质量改进方法减少新生儿抗生素使用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:本研究旨在通过质量改善(quality improvement, QI)方法探索减少新生儿抗生素使用的有效干预措施和观察指标,并定量分析这些方法是否会增加新生儿死亡风险和严重不良后果。方法:截至2024年8月27日,我们查阅了所有相关文献。对所有干预措施、结果指标、过程指标和平衡指标进行描述性统计分析。采用QI干预的组为干预组,基线期为对照组。死亡率和严重不良后果发生率作为二分类变量处理。风险比(RR)和95% ci为疗效指标。结果:共纳入了2016年至2024年间发表的57项研究。所有的研究都是前后对照研究。被研究最多的国家是美国。从这57项研究中,筛选出27项有效的干预措施,并将所有观察指标和主要结果以表格形式列出。meta分析显示,干预组的死亡率较对照组下降30% (RR = 0.7;95% ci: 0.604-0.81;结论:气法可以安全有效地减少新生儿抗生素的使用,具有临床应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
期刊最新文献
Beyond the Algorithm: Reframing Biomarker-Guided Antibiotic Stewardship with Behavioural Insights. Insights from the WHO Tricycle-aligned Fleming Fund EQASIA External Quality Assessment (EQA) programme detecting ESBL-, AmpC- and carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli in South and South-East Asia. Optimizing cloxacillin prophylaxis in hip and knee arthroplasty based on population pharmacokinetics of unbound plasma concentrations. The tissue distribution and pharmacokinetics of [14C]-olorofim following intravenous dosing in the rat. The plasma and intracellular exposure of intramuscularly administered long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine in people with HIV.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1