Madeline J Churchill, Ankit Pandeya, Renate Bauer, Tighe Christopher, Stefanie Krug, Roslyn Honodel, Shuchi Smita, Lindsey Warner, Bridget M Mooney, Alexis R Gibson, Patrick S Mitchell, Elia D Tait Wojno, Isabella Rauch
{"title":"Enteric tuft cell inflammasome activation drives NKp46+ILC3 IL22 via PGD2 and inhibits Salmonella.","authors":"Madeline J Churchill, Ankit Pandeya, Renate Bauer, Tighe Christopher, Stefanie Krug, Roslyn Honodel, Shuchi Smita, Lindsey Warner, Bridget M Mooney, Alexis R Gibson, Patrick S Mitchell, Elia D Tait Wojno, Isabella Rauch","doi":"10.1084/jem.20230803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To distinguish pathogens from commensals, the intestinal epithelium employs cytosolic innate immune sensors. Activation of the NAIP-NLRC4 inflammasome initiates extrusion of infected intestinal epithelial cells (IEC) upon cytosolic bacterial sensing. We previously reported that activation of the inflammasome in tuft cells, which are primarily known for their role in parasitic infections, leads to the release of prostaglandin D2 (PGD2). We observe that NAIP-NLRC4 inflammasome activation in tuft cells leads to an antibacterial response with increased IL-22 and antimicrobial protein levels within the small intestine, which is dependent on PGD2 signaling. A NKp46+ subset of ILC3 expresses the PGD2 receptor CRTH2 and is the source of the increased IL-22. Inflammasome activation in tuft cells also leads to better control of Salmonella Typhimurium in the distal small intestine. However, tuft cells in the cecum and colon are dispensable for antibacterial immunity. These data support that intestinal tuft cells can also induce antibacterial responses, possibly in a tissue-specific manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":15760,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Medicine","volume":"222 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20230803","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To distinguish pathogens from commensals, the intestinal epithelium employs cytosolic innate immune sensors. Activation of the NAIP-NLRC4 inflammasome initiates extrusion of infected intestinal epithelial cells (IEC) upon cytosolic bacterial sensing. We previously reported that activation of the inflammasome in tuft cells, which are primarily known for their role in parasitic infections, leads to the release of prostaglandin D2 (PGD2). We observe that NAIP-NLRC4 inflammasome activation in tuft cells leads to an antibacterial response with increased IL-22 and antimicrobial protein levels within the small intestine, which is dependent on PGD2 signaling. A NKp46+ subset of ILC3 expresses the PGD2 receptor CRTH2 and is the source of the increased IL-22. Inflammasome activation in tuft cells also leads to better control of Salmonella Typhimurium in the distal small intestine. However, tuft cells in the cecum and colon are dispensable for antibacterial immunity. These data support that intestinal tuft cells can also induce antibacterial responses, possibly in a tissue-specific manner.
期刊介绍:
Since its establishment in 1896, the Journal of Experimental Medicine (JEM) has steadfastly pursued the publication of enduring and exceptional studies in medical biology. In an era where numerous publishing groups are introducing specialized journals, we recognize the importance of offering a distinguished platform for studies that seamlessly integrate various disciplines within the pathogenesis field.
Our unique editorial system, driven by a commitment to exceptional author service, involves two collaborative groups of editors: professional editors with robust scientific backgrounds and full-time practicing scientists. Each paper undergoes evaluation by at least one editor from both groups before external review. Weekly editorial meetings facilitate comprehensive discussions on papers, incorporating external referee comments, and ensure swift decisions without unnecessary demands for extensive revisions.
Encompassing human studies and diverse in vivo experimental models of human disease, our focus within medical biology spans genetics, inflammation, immunity, infectious disease, cancer, vascular biology, metabolic disorders, neuroscience, and stem cell biology. We eagerly welcome reports ranging from atomic-level analyses to clinical interventions that unveil new mechanistic insights.