Evaluating pharmacist preferences: Preparation of a novel on-body delivery system vs. high-resistance, manual syringes for large-volume subcutaneous drugs.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1177/10781552251326574
Mehul Desai, Mitchell Blewett, Angela Yaniv, Adam Smith, Prit Patel, Catherine Loughran, Omar Rahman
{"title":"Evaluating pharmacist preferences: Preparation of a novel on-body delivery system vs. high-resistance, manual syringes for large-volume subcutaneous drugs.","authors":"Mehul Desai, Mitchell Blewett, Angela Yaniv, Adam Smith, Prit Patel, Catherine Loughran, Omar Rahman","doi":"10.1177/10781552251326574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAlthough syringe preparation for large-volume (>3 mL) subcutaneous (SC) drugs represents a significant workflow burden for pharmacists, their preferences for alternatives such as on-body delivery systems (OBDSs) are unexplored.ObjectiveTo evaluate pharmacists' preferences for preparing OBDSs vs. syringes.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, pharmacists in US academic or community settings with experience preparing SC daratumumab/hyaluronidase (HYAL), rituximab/HYAL, pertuzumab/trastuzumab/HYAL, and/or efgartigimod/HYAL completed a double-blinded, 21-item, online survey that included questions about preferences regarding the preparation of prefilled syringes versus an OBDS.ResultsThirty pharmacists completed the survey. 100% responded that the OBDS appeared to be easy to prepare and easy to learn how to prepare and preferred it to syringe preparation. In response to a preparation scenario without reduced warming time that included preparation specifics, 86.67% preferred OBDS preparation to the syringe used to administer daratumumab/HYAL due to (1) time required to prepare the drug, (2) effort required to prepare the drug, and (3) optionality in drug preparation location. 29 pharmacists (96.67%) felt that the OBDS would reduce burden, 30 (100%) felt that it would improve efficiency, and 27 (90%) felt that it would reduce preparation errors. 22 pharmacists (73.33%) felt that the OBDS could provide optionality since it can be prepared outside of the pharmacy, and 100% felt that OBDS preparation would eliminate needlestick injuries.ConclusionPharmacists reported that an OBDS would be easy to prepare and to learn how to prepare and would improve pharmacy efficiency and safety compared with syringes used for large-volume SC drug administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552251326574"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552251326574","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAlthough syringe preparation for large-volume (>3 mL) subcutaneous (SC) drugs represents a significant workflow burden for pharmacists, their preferences for alternatives such as on-body delivery systems (OBDSs) are unexplored.ObjectiveTo evaluate pharmacists' preferences for preparing OBDSs vs. syringes.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, pharmacists in US academic or community settings with experience preparing SC daratumumab/hyaluronidase (HYAL), rituximab/HYAL, pertuzumab/trastuzumab/HYAL, and/or efgartigimod/HYAL completed a double-blinded, 21-item, online survey that included questions about preferences regarding the preparation of prefilled syringes versus an OBDS.ResultsThirty pharmacists completed the survey. 100% responded that the OBDS appeared to be easy to prepare and easy to learn how to prepare and preferred it to syringe preparation. In response to a preparation scenario without reduced warming time that included preparation specifics, 86.67% preferred OBDS preparation to the syringe used to administer daratumumab/HYAL due to (1) time required to prepare the drug, (2) effort required to prepare the drug, and (3) optionality in drug preparation location. 29 pharmacists (96.67%) felt that the OBDS would reduce burden, 30 (100%) felt that it would improve efficiency, and 27 (90%) felt that it would reduce preparation errors. 22 pharmacists (73.33%) felt that the OBDS could provide optionality since it can be prepared outside of the pharmacy, and 100% felt that OBDS preparation would eliminate needlestick injuries.ConclusionPharmacists reported that an OBDS would be easy to prepare and to learn how to prepare and would improve pharmacy efficiency and safety compared with syringes used for large-volume SC drug administration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景虽然注射器配制大容量(大于 3 mL)皮下 (SC) 药物给药剂师带来了很大的工作流程负担,但他们对体外给药系统 (OBDS) 等替代品的偏好尚未得到研究。方法在这项横断面研究中,美国学术界或社区中具有制备 SC daratumumab/透明质酸酶 (HYAL)、利妥昔单抗/HYAL、pertuzumab/trastuzumab/HYAL 和/或 efgartigimod/HYAL 经验的药剂师完成了一项双盲、21 个项目的在线调查,其中包括关于制备预灌封注射器与制备 OBDS 的偏好问题。100%的药剂师回答说,OBDS 看起来易于制备,易于学习如何制备,比注射器制备更受欢迎。在回答包括制备细节在内的不缩短预热时间的制备情景时,86.67% 的药剂师倾向于使用 OBDS 制备,而不是使用注射器给药达拉曲单抗/HYAL,原因是:(1) 制备药物所需的时间;(2) 制备药物所需的精力;(3) 药物制备位置的可选择性。29 名药剂师(96.67%)认为 OBDS 可以减轻负担,30 名药剂师(100%)认为 OBDS 可以提高效率,27 名药剂师(90%)认为 OBDS 可以减少配药错误。22 名药剂师(73.33%)认为 OBDS 可提供选择性,因为它可以在药房外配制,100% 的药剂师认为 OBDS 配制可消除针刺伤。结论药剂师表示,与用于大量 SC 给药的注射器相比,OBDS 易于配制和学习如何配制,并可提高药房效率和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
期刊最新文献
Association between the profile of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and adherence to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Evaluating pharmacist preferences: Preparation of a novel on-body delivery system vs. high-resistance, manual syringes for large-volume subcutaneous drugs. Facts and figures of the compassionate use of onco-hematological drugs from 2016 to 2021: Results from the multicentric observational study Compass-O. Gravimetric-based technology-assisted workflow system for injectable anticancer drugs compounding: Design and qualification of an original weighing scale anchored inside an isolator. Impact of obesity on doxorubicin pharmacokinetics in women with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1