Neurological Injury in Comatose Patients Following Substance-Use-Related Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Safety Net Hospital.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1007/s12028-025-02229-w
Jonathan J Shih, Matheus Otero, Shital Gandhi, Jason Talbott, Bo Zhou, Jeffrey R Vitt, Neel S Singhal, Dominica Randazzo, Aaron Scheffler, J Claude Hemphill, Edilberto Amorim
{"title":"Neurological Injury in Comatose Patients Following Substance-Use-Related Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Safety Net Hospital.","authors":"Jonathan J Shih, Matheus Otero, Shital Gandhi, Jason Talbott, Bo Zhou, Jeffrey R Vitt, Neel S Singhal, Dominica Randazzo, Aaron Scheffler, J Claude Hemphill, Edilberto Amorim","doi":"10.1007/s12028-025-02229-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Substance-use-related cardiac arrest (SURCA) is a public health crisis, contributing to high mortality and severe neurological disability, particularly affecting young adults. This study aims to characterize the demographic and multimodal neurological prognostication features of patients with SURCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who presented to an urban academic safety net hospital between July 2016 and April 2022 and were comatose on admission. Patients with SURCA were identified through toxicology screening. Data on demographics, cardiac arrest characteristics, and multimodal neurological prognostication were collected. Poor neurological outcome was defined as a Cerebral Performance Category score of 3-5 at hospital discharge. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with poor neurological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 253 patients, 99 (39%) were classified as having SURCA, with 67 testing positive for stimulants and 56 testing positive for opioids. Patients with SURCA were younger (49 vs. 66 years, p < 0.001), less likely to have a witnessed cardiac arrest (56% vs. 71%, p = 0.01), and more likely to present with nonshockable rhythms (88% vs. 73%, p < 0.001). Electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring in the SURCA cohort revealed a higher incidence of generalized periodic discharges (54% vs. 35%, p = 0.02) and electrographic seizures (28% vs. 13%, p = 0.02). Outcomes were similar between SURCA and non-SURCA groups; 86% of patients with SURCA had poor neurological outcomes, with 67% not surviving to discharge, compared to 88% and 69% of patients with non-SURCA, respectively. Nonshockable rhythms and older age were associated with poor neurological outcomes, but SURCA was not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SURCA is common and is frequently associated with poor neurological outcomes despite affecting younger patients. A higher incidence of seizures and generalized periodic discharges on EEG was observed with SURCA; therefore, validation of this finding in larger multicenter cohorts is warranted. Public health interventions to improve bystander resuscitation education in populations at risk for SURCA may improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":"27-35"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02229-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Substance-use-related cardiac arrest (SURCA) is a public health crisis, contributing to high mortality and severe neurological disability, particularly affecting young adults. This study aims to characterize the demographic and multimodal neurological prognostication features of patients with SURCA.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who presented to an urban academic safety net hospital between July 2016 and April 2022 and were comatose on admission. Patients with SURCA were identified through toxicology screening. Data on demographics, cardiac arrest characteristics, and multimodal neurological prognostication were collected. Poor neurological outcome was defined as a Cerebral Performance Category score of 3-5 at hospital discharge. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with poor neurological outcomes.

Results: Among 253 patients, 99 (39%) were classified as having SURCA, with 67 testing positive for stimulants and 56 testing positive for opioids. Patients with SURCA were younger (49 vs. 66 years, p < 0.001), less likely to have a witnessed cardiac arrest (56% vs. 71%, p = 0.01), and more likely to present with nonshockable rhythms (88% vs. 73%, p < 0.001). Electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring in the SURCA cohort revealed a higher incidence of generalized periodic discharges (54% vs. 35%, p = 0.02) and electrographic seizures (28% vs. 13%, p = 0.02). Outcomes were similar between SURCA and non-SURCA groups; 86% of patients with SURCA had poor neurological outcomes, with 67% not surviving to discharge, compared to 88% and 69% of patients with non-SURCA, respectively. Nonshockable rhythms and older age were associated with poor neurological outcomes, but SURCA was not.

Conclusions: SURCA is common and is frequently associated with poor neurological outcomes despite affecting younger patients. A higher incidence of seizures and generalized periodic discharges on EEG was observed with SURCA; therefore, validation of this finding in larger multicenter cohorts is warranted. Public health interventions to improve bystander resuscitation education in populations at risk for SURCA may improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用药物导致院外心脏骤停后昏迷患者的神经损伤:一家安全网医院的回顾性队列研究。
背景:药物使用相关的心脏骤停(SURCA)是一种公共卫生危机,导致高死亡率和严重的神经功能障碍,特别是影响年轻人。本研究旨在描述SURCA患者的人口学特征和多模态神经预后特征。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2016年7月至2022年4月在某城市学术安全网医院就诊并入院时处于昏迷状态的院外心脏骤停患者。通过毒理学筛选确定SURCA患者。收集了人口统计学、心脏骤停特征和多模态神经预后的数据。出院时脑功能分类评分为3-5分即为神经系统预后差。使用逻辑回归来确定与神经预后不良相关的因素。结果:253例患者中,99例(39%)被归类为SURCA,其中67例兴奋剂检测阳性,56例阿片类药物检测阳性。SURCA患者较年轻(49岁vs 66岁)。结论:SURCA是常见的,尽管影响年轻患者,但通常与较差的神经预后相关。SURCA组癫痫发作和广泛性周期性放电发生率较高;因此,在更大的多中心队列中验证这一发现是有必要的。公共卫生干预措施改善SURCA高危人群的旁观者复苏教育可能改善这一弱势人群的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
期刊最新文献
Remote Ischemic Conditioning After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Intravenous Milrinone after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Is It Time to Be More Aggressive with Treatment Protocols? What Do We Do When the ICP Goes Up? Publisher Correction: Neuroprognostication After Cardiac Arrest: From Test-Centered Prediction to Ethically Constrained, Longitudinal Decision-Making. Feasibility of Endoscopic Surgery Versus Craniotomy for Large Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1