Feeling good about the bad: Making positive appraisals of predominantly negative stressors.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Emotion Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1037/emo0001517
Christian E Waugh, Marquis Schieber, Yifang Zhao
{"title":"Feeling good about the bad: Making positive appraisals of predominantly negative stressors.","authors":"Christian E Waugh, Marquis Schieber, Yifang Zhao","doi":"10.1037/emo0001517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People often experience positive emotions during predominantly negative stressors, and we hypothesize that one way this occurs is that people make positive appraisals of some elements of the stressors. Further, we hypothesized that people can use these positive appraisals to spontaneously and/or strategically regulate their stress responses. In several studies with online and subject pool convenience samples, participants were able to generate unambiguously positive appraisals (as defined in pilot Studies 2 and 3) of elements of predominantly negative stressors both when instructed to generate positive appraisals (Study 1) and when instructed to just list elements of their stressors with no instruction on what valence they should be (Studies 3-6). Further, just generating these positive appraisals helped participants feel better about a prolonged life stressor (Studies 4 and 6) and an acute laboratory stressor (Study 5). We successfully distinguished the emotion regulation strategy of positive \"up-appraisal\" (elaborating and focusing on positive appraisals) from that of positive \"alt-appraisal\" (reframing and changing a negative appraisal to be more positive) and showed that positive up-appraisal was more effective at improving stress-related emotions (Studies 1 and 4). Last, individual differences in positivity and negative emotionality were the most reliable predictors of generating positive appraisals of stressors. These studies demonstrate that sometimes, people can cope successfully with stressors because they are able to separate elements of that stressor, recognize that some of those elements are positive, and then elaborate and focus on those positive appraisals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001517","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People often experience positive emotions during predominantly negative stressors, and we hypothesize that one way this occurs is that people make positive appraisals of some elements of the stressors. Further, we hypothesized that people can use these positive appraisals to spontaneously and/or strategically regulate their stress responses. In several studies with online and subject pool convenience samples, participants were able to generate unambiguously positive appraisals (as defined in pilot Studies 2 and 3) of elements of predominantly negative stressors both when instructed to generate positive appraisals (Study 1) and when instructed to just list elements of their stressors with no instruction on what valence they should be (Studies 3-6). Further, just generating these positive appraisals helped participants feel better about a prolonged life stressor (Studies 4 and 6) and an acute laboratory stressor (Study 5). We successfully distinguished the emotion regulation strategy of positive "up-appraisal" (elaborating and focusing on positive appraisals) from that of positive "alt-appraisal" (reframing and changing a negative appraisal to be more positive) and showed that positive up-appraisal was more effective at improving stress-related emotions (Studies 1 and 4). Last, individual differences in positivity and negative emotionality were the most reliable predictors of generating positive appraisals of stressors. These studies demonstrate that sometimes, people can cope successfully with stressors because they are able to separate elements of that stressor, recognize that some of those elements are positive, and then elaborate and focus on those positive appraisals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emotion
Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
325
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Emotion publishes significant contributions to the study of emotion from a wide range of theoretical traditions and research domains. The journal includes articles that advance knowledge and theory about all aspects of emotional processes, including reports of substantial empirical studies, scholarly reviews, and major theoretical articles. Submissions from all domains of emotion research are encouraged, including studies focusing on cultural, social, temperament and personality, cognitive, developmental, health, or biological variables that affect or are affected by emotional functioning. Both laboratory and field studies are appropriate for the journal, as are neuroimaging studies of emotional processes.
期刊最新文献
Do parents show interpersonally oriented socialization practices for adolescents' negative emotions? Through the lens of Chinese families. Momentary awareness of body sensations is associated with concurrent affective experience. Disentangling three valence-related dimensions of emotion valuation: The good, the pleasant, and the desirable. Perceptual sensitivity to labeling stereotyped emotion expressions: Associations with age and subclinical psychopathology symptoms from childhood through early adulthood. A replication and development of the Short Cognitive Mediation Beliefs Questionnaire (CMBQ-S).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1