Effects of Attentional Focus on Dual-Task Walking Performance in Older and Young Adults.

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Motor Behavior Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1080/00222895.2025.2472789
Alice Brochado Campolina, Nathália Laísa Rodrigues Machado, Alysson Fernandes Mazoni, Valéria Andrade, Daniela Virgínia Vaz
{"title":"Effects of Attentional Focus on Dual-Task Walking Performance in Older and Young Adults.","authors":"Alice Brochado Campolina, Nathália Laísa Rodrigues Machado, Alysson Fernandes Mazoni, Valéria Andrade, Daniela Virgínia Vaz","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2025.2472789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Walking, often performed automatically, allows for concurrent tasks like carrying objects, but dual-tasks can be challenging for the older adults. As previous search supports the benefits of external focus (EF) over internal focus (IF) of attention in motor tasks, this study investigated attentional effects on dual-task walking performance in young and older adults. A total of 84 healthy participants (42 young adults, 23.02 ± 2.91 years; 42 older adults, 23.02 ± 2.91 years) were instructed to walk while carrying a filled cup without spilling. Walking speed (comfortable, fast) and attentional focus (internal, external, none) were systematically varied. Inertial sensors captured gait speed, cadence, step duration, step length, and pelvis acceleration variability, while spillage was measured in grams. A generalized linear model with bootstrap resampling (α = 0.05) examined the effects of focus, walking speed, and group. Results indicated that young adults walked faster than older adults (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and speed decreased from single-task to dual-task (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and from fast walking to comfortable walking (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant effect of attentional focus was found (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.056). The interaction between focus and speed was significant only for spillage (<i>p</i> = 0.041), showing an unimportant difference in spillage between fast walking without focus instructions (398.85 g) and with external focus instructions (399.76 g) (<i>p</i> = 0.030). The interaction between focus and group was not significant (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.531). Overall, this suggests that dual task walking may not be significantly affected by attentional focus instructions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"278-286"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2025.2472789","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Walking, often performed automatically, allows for concurrent tasks like carrying objects, but dual-tasks can be challenging for the older adults. As previous search supports the benefits of external focus (EF) over internal focus (IF) of attention in motor tasks, this study investigated attentional effects on dual-task walking performance in young and older adults. A total of 84 healthy participants (42 young adults, 23.02 ± 2.91 years; 42 older adults, 23.02 ± 2.91 years) were instructed to walk while carrying a filled cup without spilling. Walking speed (comfortable, fast) and attentional focus (internal, external, none) were systematically varied. Inertial sensors captured gait speed, cadence, step duration, step length, and pelvis acceleration variability, while spillage was measured in grams. A generalized linear model with bootstrap resampling (α = 0.05) examined the effects of focus, walking speed, and group. Results indicated that young adults walked faster than older adults (p < 0.001), and speed decreased from single-task to dual-task (p = 0.003) and from fast walking to comfortable walking (p < 0.001). No significant effect of attentional focus was found (p ≥ 0.056). The interaction between focus and speed was significant only for spillage (p = 0.041), showing an unimportant difference in spillage between fast walking without focus instructions (398.85 g) and with external focus instructions (399.76 g) (p = 0.030). The interaction between focus and group was not significant (p ≥ 0.531). Overall, this suggests that dual task walking may not be significantly affected by attentional focus instructions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注意焦点对老年人和年轻人双任务行走表现的影响。
走路通常是自动完成的,可以同时完成搬运物品等任务,但对老年人来说,双重任务可能具有挑战性。由于先前的研究支持运动任务中外部焦点(EF)比内部焦点(IF)的注意优势,本研究调查了年轻人和老年人双任务行走表现的注意影响。共84例健康受试者(青年42例,23.02±2.91岁;42名老年人(23.02±2.91岁)被要求在走路时端着装满水的杯子,不要洒出来。步行速度(舒适,快速)和注意力集中(内部,外部,无)系统地变化。惯性传感器捕获步态速度、节奏、步长、步长和骨盆加速度变异性,而溢出量以克为单位进行测量。采用自举重采样的广义线性模型(α = 0.05)检验了焦点、步行速度和分组的影响。结果表明:青年人步行速度快于老年人(p = 0.003),且由快速步行向舒适步行转变(p≥0.056)。焦点与速度之间的交互作用仅对溢出量有显著性意义(p = 0.041),无聚焦指令的快走溢出量(398.85 g)与有外部聚焦指令的快走溢出量(399.76 g)差异不显著(p = 0.030)。焦点与组间交互作用不显著(p≥0.531)。总的来说,这表明双重任务行走可能不会受到注意力集中指令的显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Motor Behavior
Journal of Motor Behavior 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Manganese Exposure on Multi-Finger Coordination with Asymptomatic Welder. Sober or Not, You Still Learn: Implicit and Explicit Motor Learning Unaffected by Moderate Alcohol. Reference Values and Accuracy-Influencing Factors for Knee Joint-Position Sense Assessments: A Cross-Sectional Study. Stochastic Resonance Stimulation Improves Postural Stability in People with Chronic Ankle Instability During Walking. Speed-Dependent Multivariate Coordination Variability Using an Ellipse-Based Vector Coding Method.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1