Assessing knowledge, attitudes, and skills toward evidence-based practice among Palestinian nursing students.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-02927-y
Moath Abu Ejheisheh, Ahmad Ayed, Ibrahim Aqtam, Ahmad Batran, Mosaab Farajallah
{"title":"Assessing knowledge, attitudes, and skills toward evidence-based practice among Palestinian nursing students.","authors":"Moath Abu Ejheisheh, Ahmad Ayed, Ibrahim Aqtam, Ahmad Batran, Mosaab Farajallah","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-02927-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates clinical expertise, patient preferences, and research evidence to guide healthcare decisions. Despite its global importance, research on EBP competencies among Palestinian nursing students remains limited. This study aims to explicitly assess EBP competency levels; knowledge, attitudes, and skills, while identifying key predictors and barriers affecting EBP integration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 273 nursing students from Palestine Ahliya University using the validated Evidence-Based Practice Competence Questionnaire (EBP-COQ). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants exhibited moderate evidence-based practice (EBP) competency, with an overall score of 59.4% (mean = 74.3/125). Domain-specific scores revealed knowledge (58%), attitudes (62%), and skills (58%) at comparable levels. Multiple linear regression identified academic progression (fourth-year status: β = 5.982, p < 0.001) and self-directed learning (papers read monthly: β = 3.133, p < 0.001) as strong predictors of higher competency. Notably, prior EBP training showed a significant negative correlation with competency (r = -0.492, p < 0.001), raising concerns about the quality and effectiveness of existing training programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides the first systematic assessment of EBP competency among Palestinian nursing students. While academic progression and self-directed learning enhance competency, concerns over the quality of EBP training programs require urgent attention. The findings underscore the need for curriculum reforms, structured mentorship, and improved access to research resources to enhance EBP integration into nursing education and practice in Palestine.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"282"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02927-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates clinical expertise, patient preferences, and research evidence to guide healthcare decisions. Despite its global importance, research on EBP competencies among Palestinian nursing students remains limited. This study aims to explicitly assess EBP competency levels; knowledge, attitudes, and skills, while identifying key predictors and barriers affecting EBP integration.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 273 nursing students from Palestine Ahliya University using the validated Evidence-Based Practice Competence Questionnaire (EBP-COQ). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression.

Results: Participants exhibited moderate evidence-based practice (EBP) competency, with an overall score of 59.4% (mean = 74.3/125). Domain-specific scores revealed knowledge (58%), attitudes (62%), and skills (58%) at comparable levels. Multiple linear regression identified academic progression (fourth-year status: β = 5.982, p < 0.001) and self-directed learning (papers read monthly: β = 3.133, p < 0.001) as strong predictors of higher competency. Notably, prior EBP training showed a significant negative correlation with competency (r = -0.492, p < 0.001), raising concerns about the quality and effectiveness of existing training programs.

Conclusion: This study provides the first systematic assessment of EBP competency among Palestinian nursing students. While academic progression and self-directed learning enhance competency, concerns over the quality of EBP training programs require urgent attention. The findings underscore the need for curriculum reforms, structured mentorship, and improved access to research resources to enhance EBP integration into nursing education and practice in Palestine.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the causes of workplace bullying among nurses in pediatric intensive care units: a qualitative study. Structural equation modeling for influencing factors with quality care behavior among nursing assistants: a cross-sectional study. Workplace violence, work characteristics, and seniority levels among nurses: a cross-sectional study. Assessing knowledge, attitudes, and skills toward evidence-based practice among Palestinian nursing students. Effects of nurse-led telephone interventions on HbA1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a Meta-analysis-based evaluation of follow-up protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1