Enhanced quality of nutrition services during antenatal care through interventions to improve maternal nutrition in Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, and India.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Global Health Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.7189/jogh.15.04054
Phuong H Nguyen, Lan M Tran, Shivani Kachwaha, Tina Sanghvi, Zeba Mahmud, Maurice G Zafimanjaka, Tamirat Walissa, Sebanti Ghosh, Sunny S Kim
{"title":"Enhanced quality of nutrition services during antenatal care through interventions to improve maternal nutrition in Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, and India.","authors":"Phuong H Nguyen, Lan M Tran, Shivani Kachwaha, Tina Sanghvi, Zeba Mahmud, Maurice G Zafimanjaka, Tamirat Walissa, Sebanti Ghosh, Sunny S Kim","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality antenatal care (ANC) services are critical for maternal health and nutrition. Information on the quality of nutrition interventions during ANC is scarce in low- and middle-income countries. We examined the effects of intensified maternal nutrition interventions during ANC on service readiness, provision of care, and experience of care and assessed the inter-relationships between the dimensions of quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from impact evaluations of maternal nutrition interventions in Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, and India. We calculated the quality of nutrition services during ANC using information from health facility assessments, health care provider interviews, ANC observations, and client exit interviews. We used structural equation models to examine relationships between the dimensions of quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health facilities in all four countries had a high service readiness component in terms of basic amenities, equipment and supplies, medicines and commodities, and guidelines (mean (x̄) = 8-10 in Bangladesh and Burkina Faso, x̄ = 7-9 in Ethiopia, and x̄ = 6-8 in India). Scores for provision of care were low across the countries but higher in intervention compared to control areas in Bangladesh (5.2 vs. 2.9) and Burkina Faso (5.6 vs. 4.8), but not significantly different in Ethiopia (range = 4.7-5.0) and India (range = 2.6-3.5). For experience of care, client satisfaction scores were high and similar between intervention and control areas in all countries (range = 8.3-9.7), but client experience scores were lower with statistically significant differences observed only in Bangladesh (x̄ = 8.2 in intervention vs. x̄ = 7.1 in control areas). The interventions had significant direct effects on service readiness in Bangladesh (β = 0.07), Burkina Faso (β = 1.20), and Ethiopia (β = 1.0), on the provision of care in Bangladesh (β = 2.27), Burkina Faso (β = 1.27), and India (β = 0.96), and experience of care in Bangladesh (β = 0.21).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, we provided evidence on various dimensions of service quality that may be improved by interventions to strengthen nutrition services during ANC in diverse low- and middle-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04054"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11906204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quality antenatal care (ANC) services are critical for maternal health and nutrition. Information on the quality of nutrition interventions during ANC is scarce in low- and middle-income countries. We examined the effects of intensified maternal nutrition interventions during ANC on service readiness, provision of care, and experience of care and assessed the inter-relationships between the dimensions of quality.

Methods: We used data from impact evaluations of maternal nutrition interventions in Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, and India. We calculated the quality of nutrition services during ANC using information from health facility assessments, health care provider interviews, ANC observations, and client exit interviews. We used structural equation models to examine relationships between the dimensions of quality.

Results: Health facilities in all four countries had a high service readiness component in terms of basic amenities, equipment and supplies, medicines and commodities, and guidelines (mean (x̄) = 8-10 in Bangladesh and Burkina Faso, x̄ = 7-9 in Ethiopia, and x̄ = 6-8 in India). Scores for provision of care were low across the countries but higher in intervention compared to control areas in Bangladesh (5.2 vs. 2.9) and Burkina Faso (5.6 vs. 4.8), but not significantly different in Ethiopia (range = 4.7-5.0) and India (range = 2.6-3.5). For experience of care, client satisfaction scores were high and similar between intervention and control areas in all countries (range = 8.3-9.7), but client experience scores were lower with statistically significant differences observed only in Bangladesh (x̄ = 8.2 in intervention vs. x̄ = 7.1 in control areas). The interventions had significant direct effects on service readiness in Bangladesh (β = 0.07), Burkina Faso (β = 1.20), and Ethiopia (β = 1.0), on the provision of care in Bangladesh (β = 2.27), Burkina Faso (β = 1.27), and India (β = 0.96), and experience of care in Bangladesh (β = 0.21).

Conclusions: In this study, we provided evidence on various dimensions of service quality that may be improved by interventions to strengthen nutrition services during ANC in diverse low- and middle-income countries.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在孟加拉国、布基纳法索、埃塞俄比亚和印度,通过干预措施改善孕产妇营养,提高产前保健期间营养服务的质量。
背景:高质量的产前保健服务对孕产妇保健和营养至关重要。在低收入和中等收入国家,关于非洲人免疫大会期间营养干预措施质量的信息很少。我们检查了ANC期间强化的孕产妇营养干预对服务准备、护理提供和护理经验的影响,并评估了质量维度之间的相互关系。方法:我们使用来自孟加拉国、布基纳法索、埃塞俄比亚和印度孕产妇营养干预措施影响评估的数据。我们使用来自卫生设施评估、卫生保健提供者访谈、ANC观察和客户退出访谈的信息计算了ANC期间的营养服务质量。我们使用结构方程模型来检验质量各维度之间的关系。结果:所有四个国家的卫生设施在基本设施、设备和用品、药品和商品以及指南方面的服务就绪程度都很高(孟加拉国和布基纳法索的平均值(x ā) = 8-10,埃塞俄比亚的平均值(x ā) = 7-9,印度的平均值(x ā) = 6-8)。各国在提供护理方面的得分都很低,但在干预方面的得分高于孟加拉国(5.2对2.9)和布基纳法索(5.6对4.8)的对照地区,但在埃塞俄比亚(范围= 4.7-5.0)和印度(范围= 2.6-3.5)没有显著差异。在护理体验方面,所有国家的干预区和控制区的客户满意度得分都很高且相似(范围= 8.3-9.7),但客户体验得分较低,仅在孟加拉国观察到统计学上的显著差异(干预区x′= 8.2,控制区x′= 7.1)。干预措施对孟加拉国(β = 0.07)、布基纳法索(β = 1.20)和埃塞俄比亚(β = 1.0)的服务准备有显著的直接影响,对孟加拉国(β = 2.27)、布基纳法索(β = 1.27)和印度(β = 0.96)的护理提供有显著的直接影响,对孟加拉国的护理体验有显著的直接影响(β = 0.21)。结论:在本研究中,我们提供的证据表明,在不同的低收入和中等收入国家,通过干预措施加强ANC期间的营养服务,可以改善服务质量的各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
期刊最新文献
Disclosures of conflicts of interest from the editors of the Journal of Global Health - 2026. Assessing the role of interventions and climate on malaria mortality among children under five years of age: insights from two decades of data from the Health Demographic Surveillance System of Nouna, Burkina Faso. Multi-Omics for Mothers and Infants (MOMI) Consortium: a global initiative to study adverse pregnancy outcomes. Association of caesarean section history with adverse pregnancy outcomes in placenta accreta spectrum: the mediating role of placenta previa. Pregnancy complications and caesarean section: a latent class analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1