The Radial Forearm Butterfly Flap: A Novel Technique for Oral Cavity Reconstruction With Primary Healing of the Forearm Donor Area.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1002/hed.28134
Haoyue Xu, Liyan Liu, Baoxing Pang, Yi Ren, Xiaodan Hu, Minghao Li, Yaling Wang, Lingxue Bu
{"title":"The Radial Forearm Butterfly Flap: A Novel Technique for Oral Cavity Reconstruction With Primary Healing of the Forearm Donor Area.","authors":"Haoyue Xu, Liyan Liu, Baoxing Pang, Yi Ren, Xiaodan Hu, Minghao Li, Yaling Wang, Lingxue Bu","doi":"10.1002/hed.28134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The traditional radial forearm free flap (TRFFF) combined with split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) for repairing oral defects presents unavoidable donor area complications, such as delayed healing and scar hyperplasia. This study introduces a modified radial forearm free flap, known as the butterfly flap, which enables primary closure of the forearm donor area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 35 patients who received the butterfly flap and 40 patients who received TRFFF combined with STSG between March 2022 and March 2024. We compared subjective evaluations of postoperative pain and scar degree in the donor area as well as objective assessments of preoperative and postoperative grip strength, key pinch strength, and postoperative donor area complications between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The delayed wound healing rate was 5.7% (2/35) in the butterfly flap group and 25.0% (10/40) in the TRFFF group, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.023). The postoperative scar score of the donor site in the butterfly flap group was significantly lower than that in the TRFFF group (5.57 ± 1.24 vs. 7.10 ± 1.24, p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in pain severity scores, incidence of other donor complications, and changes in grip and key pinch strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The radial forearm butterfly flap can directly close the donor area wound without skin grafting, reducing scar formation and the delayed healing rate of the donor area.</p>","PeriodicalId":55072,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.28134","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The traditional radial forearm free flap (TRFFF) combined with split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) for repairing oral defects presents unavoidable donor area complications, such as delayed healing and scar hyperplasia. This study introduces a modified radial forearm free flap, known as the butterfly flap, which enables primary closure of the forearm donor area.

Methods: The study included 35 patients who received the butterfly flap and 40 patients who received TRFFF combined with STSG between March 2022 and March 2024. We compared subjective evaluations of postoperative pain and scar degree in the donor area as well as objective assessments of preoperative and postoperative grip strength, key pinch strength, and postoperative donor area complications between the two groups.

Results: The delayed wound healing rate was 5.7% (2/35) in the butterfly flap group and 25.0% (10/40) in the TRFFF group, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.023). The postoperative scar score of the donor site in the butterfly flap group was significantly lower than that in the TRFFF group (5.57 ± 1.24 vs. 7.10 ± 1.24, p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in pain severity scores, incidence of other donor complications, and changes in grip and key pinch strength.

Conclusion: The radial forearm butterfly flap can directly close the donor area wound without skin grafting, reducing scar formation and the delayed healing rate of the donor area.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
278
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Head & Neck is an international multidisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck. This area involves the overlapping interests and expertise of several surgical and medical specialties, including general surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, oral surgery, dermatology, ophthalmology, pathology, radiotherapy, medical oncology, and the corresponding basic sciences.
期刊最新文献
Survival Outcomes in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Systematic Review of 17 497 Cases and Meta-Analysis. Issue Information The Radial Forearm Butterfly Flap: A Novel Technique for Oral Cavity Reconstruction With Primary Healing of the Forearm Donor Area. Vision Changes After Head and Neck Cancer Treatment. A Case of a Huge Left Common Carotid Artery Paraganglioma Resected With the Left Thyroid Gland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1