Editorial Commentary: Posterior Tibial Slope-Reducing Osteotomy Should Be Considered in Patients Having Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction if Posterior Tibial Slope Is Greater Than 12° to 14°

David H. Dejour M.D. , Michael J. Dan M.D. , Nicolas Cance M.D.
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: Posterior Tibial Slope-Reducing Osteotomy Should Be Considered in Patients Having Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction if Posterior Tibial Slope Is Greater Than 12° to 14°","authors":"David H. Dejour M.D. ,&nbsp;Michael J. Dan M.D. ,&nbsp;Nicolas Cance M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Increased posterior tibial slope (PTS) has long been known to increase the risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction failure in both the primary and revision setting. In cases of failed ACL reconstruction in the setting of high tibial slope, ACL revision plus a slope-correcting tibial deflexion osteotomy is more effective than ACL revision plus a lateral extra-articular procedure such as anterolateral ligament reconstruction or lateral extra-articular tenodesis. Recent research has confirmed that slope-reducing proximal tibial osteotomy improves outcomes in ACL reconstruction patients with elevated PTS, especially in ACL revision cases and in cases with PTS of 12° or greater. Absent slope-correcting osteotomy, patients with PTS of 12° or greater have high rates of failure after hamstring ACL reconstruction and increased rates of failure after bone–patellar tendon–bone reconstruction. PTS reduction should be considered in patients having primary ACL reconstruction if PTS is greater than 12° to 14°.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 8","pages":"Pages 3196-3199"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806325001604","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increased posterior tibial slope (PTS) has long been known to increase the risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction failure in both the primary and revision setting. In cases of failed ACL reconstruction in the setting of high tibial slope, ACL revision plus a slope-correcting tibial deflexion osteotomy is more effective than ACL revision plus a lateral extra-articular procedure such as anterolateral ligament reconstruction or lateral extra-articular tenodesis. Recent research has confirmed that slope-reducing proximal tibial osteotomy improves outcomes in ACL reconstruction patients with elevated PTS, especially in ACL revision cases and in cases with PTS of 12° or greater. Absent slope-correcting osteotomy, patients with PTS of 12° or greater have high rates of failure after hamstring ACL reconstruction and increased rates of failure after bone–patellar tendon–bone reconstruction. PTS reduction should be considered in patients having primary ACL reconstruction if PTS is greater than 12° to 14°.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如果胫骨后斜坡(PTS)大于 12-14 度,则应考虑对进行前交叉韧带初次重建的患者进行胫骨后斜坡(PTS)减低截骨术。
长期以来,人们都知道胫骨后斜度(PTS)的增加会增加前交叉韧带(ACL)重建失败的风险,无论是初次还是翻修。在高胫骨斜度下ACL重建失败的情况下,ACL翻修加斜校正胫骨屈曲截骨术比ACL翻修加外侧关节外手术(如前外侧韧带重建或外侧关节外肌腱固定术)更有效。最近的研究证实,在PTS升高的前交叉韧带重建患者中,尤其是前交叉韧带翻修病例和PTS为12°或更高的病例中,斜降胫骨近端截骨术改善了预后。如果不做斜面矫正截骨术,PTS为12°或更大的患者在腿筋前交叉韧带重建后失败率很高,在骨-髌腱-骨重建后失败率增加。如果PTS大于12°至14°,则应考虑进行初级ACL重建患者的PTS复位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Instructions for Authors Announcements Masthead Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1