Glenoid Labral Articular Disruption Lesions in the Setting of First-Time Anterior Shoulder Instability

IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2025.02.030
Jenna L. Dvorsky M.S. , Ryan T. Lin B.S. , Confidence Njoku-Austin M.D. , Yunseo Linda Park B.S. , Sophia McMahon B.S. , Zachary J. Herman M.D. , Rajiv P. Reddy M.D. , Ehab M. Nazzal M.D. , Matthew Como B.S. , Albert Lin M.D.
{"title":"Glenoid Labral Articular Disruption Lesions in the Setting of First-Time Anterior Shoulder Instability","authors":"Jenna L. Dvorsky M.S. ,&nbsp;Ryan T. Lin B.S. ,&nbsp;Confidence Njoku-Austin M.D. ,&nbsp;Yunseo Linda Park B.S. ,&nbsp;Sophia McMahon B.S. ,&nbsp;Zachary J. Herman M.D. ,&nbsp;Rajiv P. Reddy M.D. ,&nbsp;Ehab M. Nazzal M.D. ,&nbsp;Matthew Como B.S. ,&nbsp;Albert Lin M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.02.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare the clinical outcomes and rates of recurrent instability in patients after arthroscopic Bankart repair with and without glenolabral articular disruption (GLAD) lesions in the setting of first-time anterior instability events.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>This was a retrospective comparative case series of consecutive patients with GLAD lesions in the setting of first-time anterior instability events who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair. Patients with GLAD lesions (cases) were matched at a 1:3 ratio for sex, age, body mass index<span><span>, and sports participation to those without GLAD lesions (controls). Primary outcomes included postoperative range of motion (forward elevation and external rotation) and patient-reported outcomes: Subjective Shoulder Value, visual analog scale score, and Western Ontario </span>Shoulder Instability Index. Rates of recurrent instability after primary arthroscopic stabilization were also collected. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between the control and GLAD groups, with significance set to </span></span><em>P</em> ≤ 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 56 patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior stabilization between 2012 and 2020 were included for analysis, of whom 14 had GLAD lesions whereas the remaining 42 were controls. The average follow-up time from surgery in controls was 8.2 years (range, 3.1-11.7 years), whereas the average follow-up time in patients with GLAD lesions was 7.6 years (range, 3.8-11.8 years). There were no differences in postoperative forward flexion or external rotation, Subjective Shoulder Value, visual analog scale score, or Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index. The rate of recurrent instability was found to be the same in both the control and GLAD groups (7% and 7%, respectively; <em>P</em> = .16).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with GLAD lesions in the setting of first-time anterior instability had comparable patient-reported outcomes, forward flexion, and external rotation postoperatively to control patients. In addition, the presence of a GLAD lesion did not influence the rate of recurrent instability.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, retrospective comparative case series.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 9","pages":"Pages 3503-3509"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806325001513","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the clinical outcomes and rates of recurrent instability in patients after arthroscopic Bankart repair with and without glenolabral articular disruption (GLAD) lesions in the setting of first-time anterior instability events.

Methods

This was a retrospective comparative case series of consecutive patients with GLAD lesions in the setting of first-time anterior instability events who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair. Patients with GLAD lesions (cases) were matched at a 1:3 ratio for sex, age, body mass index, and sports participation to those without GLAD lesions (controls). Primary outcomes included postoperative range of motion (forward elevation and external rotation) and patient-reported outcomes: Subjective Shoulder Value, visual analog scale score, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index. Rates of recurrent instability after primary arthroscopic stabilization were also collected. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between the control and GLAD groups, with significance set to P ≤ 0.05.

Results

A total of 56 patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior stabilization between 2012 and 2020 were included for analysis, of whom 14 had GLAD lesions whereas the remaining 42 were controls. The average follow-up time from surgery in controls was 8.2 years (range, 3.1-11.7 years), whereas the average follow-up time in patients with GLAD lesions was 7.6 years (range, 3.8-11.8 years). There were no differences in postoperative forward flexion or external rotation, Subjective Shoulder Value, visual analog scale score, or Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index. The rate of recurrent instability was found to be the same in both the control and GLAD groups (7% and 7%, respectively; P = .16).

Conclusions

Patients with GLAD lesions in the setting of first-time anterior instability had comparable patient-reported outcomes, forward flexion, and external rotation postoperatively to control patients. In addition, the presence of a GLAD lesion did not influence the rate of recurrent instability.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, retrospective comparative case series.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首次肩关节前部不稳的盂唇关节断裂病变。
目的:本研究的目的是比较首次发生前路不稳定事件的有GLAD病变和无GLAD病变的关节镜Bankart修复患者的临床结果和复发不稳定率。方法:这是一个回顾性的比较病例系列,连续患者的GLAD病变设置首次前路不稳定事件,接受关节镜Bankart修复。有GLAD病变的患者(病例)与没有GLAD病变的患者(对照组)按1:3的比例进行性别、年龄、BMI和运动配对。主要结局包括术后ROM(向前抬高和外旋)和PROs:主观肩值(SSV)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)和西安大略省肩部不稳定指数(WOSI)。还收集了原发性关节镜稳定后复发性不稳定的病例。采用STATA进行数据分析。P≤0.05,差异有统计学意义。结果:2012-2020年共纳入56例接受关节镜前路稳定的患者进行分析,其中14例患者有GLAD病变,其余42例为对照组。对照组手术后的平均随访时间为8.2年(3.1 - 11.7年),而GLAD患者的平均随访时间为7.6年(3.8 - 11.8年)。术后前屈或外旋无差异,SSV、VAS或WOSI评分无差异。对照组和GLAD组的复发不稳定性发生率相同(分别为7%对7%,p=0.16)。结论:首次前路不稳的GLAD病变患者术后的PROs、前屈和外旋与对照组相当。此外,GLAD病变的存在并不影响复发性不稳定的发生率。证据等级:四级回顾性比较病例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Hip Microinstability-Now We Know What It Is, But What Do We Do About It? Introducing Matthew Salzler, M.D., as Deputy Editor. The Literature Shows Heterogeneity and Promise for the Role of Hip Arthroscopy Combined With Periacetabular Osteotomy for Dysplastic Patients, But Nuanced Decision Making and Further Research Are Required. Editorial Commentary: Subscapularis Tears With Advanced Fatty Infiltration: When Every Option Is Imperfect. Open Antegrade Muscle Advancement Reduces Retear Rates Compared to Arthroscopic Repair With Intra-articular Release in Subscapularis Tears With Advanced Fatty Infiltration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1