The rate of patients screened positive for gaming disorder/Internet gaming disorder among adolescents with mental health issues assessed by two screening tests: A nine-item screening test for GD (GAMES Test) and the Ten-Item Internet Gaming Disorder Test (IGDT-10).

PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences Pub Date : 2025-03-13 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1002/pcn5.70080
Masaru Tateno, Takanobu Matsuzaki, Ayumi Takano, Yukie Tateno, Takahiro A Kato, Susumu Higuchi
{"title":"The rate of patients screened positive for gaming disorder/Internet gaming disorder among adolescents with mental health issues assessed by two screening tests: A nine-item screening test for GD (GAMES Test) and the Ten-Item Internet Gaming Disorder Test (IGDT-10).","authors":"Masaru Tateno, Takanobu Matsuzaki, Ayumi Takano, Yukie Tateno, Takahiro A Kato, Susumu Higuchi","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study is to estimate the rate of patients who screened positive for gaming disorder (GD) in ICD-11 among adolescents with psychiatric and/or developmental disorders by using two screening tests: a nine-item screening test for GD, GAMing Engagement Screening test (GAMES Test), and the Ten-Item Internet Gaming Disorder Test (IGDT-10).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects were 257 adolescent patients attending a psychiatric clinic in Sapporo, Japan. They were asked to complete two questionnaires. The total score on the IGDT-10 was calculated by two different scoring methods, original version (OV) and modified version (MV). The three groups were also compared on the basis of their clinical diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 203 respondents, 42 (20.7%) screened positive using the GAMES Test. With respect to the IGDT-10, only eight (3.9%) screened positive using the IGDT-10 OV scoring, while 55 (27.1%) screened positive using the IGDT-10 MV. The most notable finding was that the mean total scores on the GAMES Test and the IGDT-10 MV were significantly higher in the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder group than in the other two groups (depression and autism spectrum disorder).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study showed that adolescents with mental health problems had a higher rate of screening positivity on self-rated screening tools for GD than the general population. Because excessive gaming has a wide range of adverse effects on adolescents' mental health, early detection of probable GD is crucial. Screening for GD should be part of routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":"4 1","pages":"e70080"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11904998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.70080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to estimate the rate of patients who screened positive for gaming disorder (GD) in ICD-11 among adolescents with psychiatric and/or developmental disorders by using two screening tests: a nine-item screening test for GD, GAMing Engagement Screening test (GAMES Test), and the Ten-Item Internet Gaming Disorder Test (IGDT-10).

Methods: Subjects were 257 adolescent patients attending a psychiatric clinic in Sapporo, Japan. They were asked to complete two questionnaires. The total score on the IGDT-10 was calculated by two different scoring methods, original version (OV) and modified version (MV). The three groups were also compared on the basis of their clinical diagnoses.

Results: Of the 203 respondents, 42 (20.7%) screened positive using the GAMES Test. With respect to the IGDT-10, only eight (3.9%) screened positive using the IGDT-10 OV scoring, while 55 (27.1%) screened positive using the IGDT-10 MV. The most notable finding was that the mean total scores on the GAMES Test and the IGDT-10 MV were significantly higher in the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder group than in the other two groups (depression and autism spectrum disorder).

Conclusion: The results of this study showed that adolescents with mental health problems had a higher rate of screening positivity on self-rated screening tools for GD than the general population. Because excessive gaming has a wide range of adverse effects on adolescents' mental health, early detection of probable GD is crucial. Screening for GD should be part of routine clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The 12-item self-report Questionnaire for Difficulty in Social Communication as a simultaneous prescreening of autism spectrum and social anxiety. Mental health needs in the acute and subacute phases of the 2024 Noto Peninsula earthquake: Emergency Medical Information System data analysis in Disaster Psychiatric Assistance Team activities. Neurodevelopmental and personality traits of somatic symptom disorder: A cross-sectional study. Psychological support for an adolescent awaiting heart transplantation: A case report on psychological intervention using the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant. Medical staff's knowledge of delirium by occupation and the effectiveness of an on-demand e-learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1