Three-Year Outcomes of Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) versus Non-CTO Femoropopliteal Lesions Treated With Atherectomy Followed by Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty.

IF 0.7 Vascular and endovascular surgery Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1177/15385744251326976
Haroon Kamran, Rohit Gokhale, Michael Halista, Anna Telegina, Zulfiya Bakirova, Anvar Babaev
{"title":"Three-Year Outcomes of Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) versus Non-CTO Femoropopliteal Lesions Treated With Atherectomy Followed by Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty.","authors":"Haroon Kamran, Rohit Gokhale, Michael Halista, Anna Telegina, Zulfiya Bakirova, Anvar Babaev","doi":"10.1177/15385744251326976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundEndovascular intervention of the femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions (CTOs) is technically challenging and associated with increased rates of treatment failure and complications. The long-term patency of CTOs of the femoropopliteal segment treated with contemporary tools, such as atherectomy and drug-eluting technology, is not well studied.MethodsWe performed a prospective, single-center analysis of 60 consecutive patients with femoropopliteal disease successfully treated with either directional or orbital atherectomy followed by paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB). Endpoints of interest were freedom from restenosis and revascularization following atherectomy and DCB angioplasty. All patients underwent clinical and imaging evaluation for 3 years to identify evidence of target lesion restenosis (RS) and revascularization (TLR).ResultsThere were 26 patients with CTO and 34 patients with non-CTO lesions. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the CTO and non-CTO groups other than ankle-brachial indices (ABI, 0.73 ± 0.11 vs 0.88 ± 0.14, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Kaplan Meier (KM) analysis for freedom from RS and TLR at 3 years was similar among the 2 groups (log rank p; 0.42, 0.69 respectively). Post-procedure, all patients had improvement of claudication, normalization of ABI indexes and duplex ultrasound velocities.ConclusionFreedom from target lesion restenosis and revascularization at 3 years were similar between CTO and non-CTO lesions treated with atherectomy followed by DCB angioplasty. These findings underscore the importance of optimal vessel preparation to achieve improved patency regardless of lesion morphology.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"487-494"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744251326976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundEndovascular intervention of the femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions (CTOs) is technically challenging and associated with increased rates of treatment failure and complications. The long-term patency of CTOs of the femoropopliteal segment treated with contemporary tools, such as atherectomy and drug-eluting technology, is not well studied.MethodsWe performed a prospective, single-center analysis of 60 consecutive patients with femoropopliteal disease successfully treated with either directional or orbital atherectomy followed by paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB). Endpoints of interest were freedom from restenosis and revascularization following atherectomy and DCB angioplasty. All patients underwent clinical and imaging evaluation for 3 years to identify evidence of target lesion restenosis (RS) and revascularization (TLR).ResultsThere were 26 patients with CTO and 34 patients with non-CTO lesions. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the CTO and non-CTO groups other than ankle-brachial indices (ABI, 0.73 ± 0.11 vs 0.88 ± 0.14, P < 0.001). Kaplan Meier (KM) analysis for freedom from RS and TLR at 3 years was similar among the 2 groups (log rank p; 0.42, 0.69 respectively). Post-procedure, all patients had improvement of claudication, normalization of ABI indexes and duplex ultrasound velocities.ConclusionFreedom from target lesion restenosis and revascularization at 3 years were similar between CTO and non-CTO lesions treated with atherectomy followed by DCB angioplasty. These findings underscore the importance of optimal vessel preparation to achieve improved patency regardless of lesion morphology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性全闭塞(CTO)与非CTO股腘动脉病变经动脉粥样硬化切除术后药物包被球囊血管成形术治疗的三年结果
背景:股腘慢性全闭塞(CTOs)的血管介入治疗在技术上具有挑战性,并且与治疗失败率和并发症增加有关。当代工具(如动脉粥样硬化切除术和药物洗脱技术)治疗股腘段CTOs的长期通畅尚未得到很好的研究。方法:我们对60例连续接受定向或眶动脉粥样硬化切除术后采用紫杉醇药物包被球囊(DCB)治疗的股腘动脉疾病患者进行了前瞻性单中心分析。研究的终点是动脉粥样硬化切除术和DCB血管成形术后再狭窄和血运重建的自由。所有患者均进行了3年的临床和影像学评估,以确定目标病变再狭窄(RS)和血运重建术(TLR)的证据。结果CTO病变26例,非CTO病变34例。CTO组和非CTO组的基线人口统计学和临床特征除踝臂指数外相似(ABI, 0.73±0.11 vs 0.88±0.14,P < 0.001)。Kaplan Meier (KM)对3年RS和TLR自由度的分析在两组之间相似(log rank p;0.42, 0.69)。术后,所有患者跛行改善,ABI指数恢复正常,双超声速度恢复正常。结论经动脉粥样硬化切除术后DCB血管成形术治疗的CTO和非CTO病变3年无靶灶再狭窄和血运重建相似。这些发现强调了无论病变形态如何,最佳血管准备对于改善通畅的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Endovascular Management of Tibial Occlusive Disease With Concomitant Metatarsal Pseudoaneurysm and Arteriovenous Fistula in a Diabetic Foot: A Limb Salvage Case. Median Arcuate Ligament Compressing Multiple Arteries in a Young Man Treated by Surgical Release. Non-Surgical Pneumoperitoneum After Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair- Case Report. Large Right True Subclavian Artery Aneurysm Treated With Hybrid Surgery. Perioperative and Long-Term Outcomes of Lower Extremity Revascularization in Patients With Malignancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1