Is disagreement beneficial for market efficiency? Evidence from ESG ratings

IF 2.8 2区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of International Money and Finance Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2025.103322
Libo Yin , Xiaoye Zhu , Zhi Su , Hongliang Guo
{"title":"Is disagreement beneficial for market efficiency? Evidence from ESG ratings","authors":"Libo Yin ,&nbsp;Xiaoye Zhu ,&nbsp;Zhi Su ,&nbsp;Hongliang Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.jimonfin.2025.103322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>ESG rating disagreement refers to discrepancies in ESG performance ratings assigned to a firm by different rating agencies. This study investigates how ESG rating disagreement impacts firm pricing efficiency. These findings demonstrate that ESG rating disagreement contributes to promoting firm pricing efficiency. This effect is especially noticeable during periods of decreased market sentiment, volatility, turnover, and increased liquidity and among firms with specific characteristics, including large market capitalization, value orientation, higher institutional ownership, and superior ESG ratings. The facilitative effect of ESG rating disagreement stems from the diverse information provided by ESG rating agencies, which is more effectively incorporated into stock prices because of the enhanced learning effect of investors. This study is important for achieving a more comprehensive and objective understanding of ESG rating disagreement in financial markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48331,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Money and Finance","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 103322"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Money and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261560625000579","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ESG rating disagreement refers to discrepancies in ESG performance ratings assigned to a firm by different rating agencies. This study investigates how ESG rating disagreement impacts firm pricing efficiency. These findings demonstrate that ESG rating disagreement contributes to promoting firm pricing efficiency. This effect is especially noticeable during periods of decreased market sentiment, volatility, turnover, and increased liquidity and among firms with specific characteristics, including large market capitalization, value orientation, higher institutional ownership, and superior ESG ratings. The facilitative effect of ESG rating disagreement stems from the diverse information provided by ESG rating agencies, which is more effectively incorporated into stock prices because of the enhanced learning effect of investors. This study is important for achieving a more comprehensive and objective understanding of ESG rating disagreement in financial markets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分歧是否有利于提高市场效率?来自环境、社会和治理评级的证据
ESG 评级差异是指不同评级机构对一家公司的 ESG 业绩评级存在差异。本研究探讨了 ESG 评级差异如何影响公司定价效率。研究结果表明,ESG 评级差异有助于提高公司定价效率。在市场情绪、波动性、成交量下降和流动性增加的时期,以及在具有特定特征(包括大市值、价值导向、较高的机构所有权和较高的 ESG 评级)的公司中,这种效应尤为明显。环境、社会和公司治理评级分歧的促进作用源于环境、社会和公司治理评级机构提供的多样化信息,由于投资者学习效应的增强,这些信息被更有效地纳入股票价格。这项研究对于更全面、客观地了解金融市场中的 ESG 评级分歧具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
141
期刊介绍: Since its launch in 1982, Journal of International Money and Finance has built up a solid reputation as a high quality scholarly journal devoted to theoretical and empirical research in the fields of international monetary economics, international finance, and the rapidly developing overlap area between the two. Researchers in these areas, and financial market professionals too, pay attention to the articles that the journal publishes. Authors published in the journal are in the forefront of scholarly research on exchange rate behaviour, foreign exchange options, international capital markets, international monetary and fiscal policy, international transmission and related questions.
期刊最新文献
Forecasting corporate bond returns amid climate change risk: A dynamic forecast combination approach Is disagreement beneficial for market efficiency? Evidence from ESG ratings Editorial Board Synthetic leverage and fund risk-taking The role of hedge funds in the Swiss franc foreign exchange market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1