Eco-efficient lime/pumice mortars with sheep wool for heritage restoration: Life cycle and energy savings

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2025.115624
Rüya Kılıç Demircan , Muhammet Ahmet Mecit Işık , Ahmet Benli , Gökhan Genç , Figen Beyhan , Gökhan Kaplan
{"title":"Eco-efficient lime/pumice mortars with sheep wool for heritage restoration: Life cycle and energy savings","authors":"Rüya Kılıç Demircan ,&nbsp;Muhammet Ahmet Mecit Işık ,&nbsp;Ahmet Benli ,&nbsp;Gökhan Genç ,&nbsp;Figen Beyhan ,&nbsp;Gökhan Kaplan","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Currently, 40 % of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and energy use are attributable to the building sector. Aside from thermal insulation levels and energy requirements, primary energy consumption, CO<sub>2</sub> reductions, and the environmentally friendly properties of the materials used are currently being considered when evaluating building sustainability and energy efficiency. Therefore, it is essential to optimize the use of ecological materials in buildings in order to make them as sustainable as feasible. Utilizing slaked lime and pumice powder as binders, nine distinct types of mortars reinforced with sheep wool fibers with comparable workability were examined. This research assessed the fresh, physico-mechanical, durability, life cycle assessment and thermal properties of restoration mortars reinforced with wool fibers and containing pumice powder in place of slaked lime at 0, 25, and 50 % replacement rates. The three percentages of wool fibers by volume that were used in this investigation were 0, 0.25 and 0.50 %. It was also investigated how well the combinations held up to high temperatures, dry shrinkage, and sorptivity. Microstructural analysis of the mixtures were made based on SEM. The findings indicated that the mixture with 50 % pumice powder and 0 %wool fibers showed the best compressive strength performance, exhibiting a strength gain of approximately 953 and 643 % in comparison to the control mixture at 28 and 90 days, respectively. The same mixture also demonstrated the lowest sorptivity and dry shrinkage, while the reference blend exhibited the lowest thermal conductivity. The mixture with 50 %PP and 0.50 %wool fibers showed the best high temperature performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 115624"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125002977","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, 40 % of CO2 emissions and energy use are attributable to the building sector. Aside from thermal insulation levels and energy requirements, primary energy consumption, CO2 reductions, and the environmentally friendly properties of the materials used are currently being considered when evaluating building sustainability and energy efficiency. Therefore, it is essential to optimize the use of ecological materials in buildings in order to make them as sustainable as feasible. Utilizing slaked lime and pumice powder as binders, nine distinct types of mortars reinforced with sheep wool fibers with comparable workability were examined. This research assessed the fresh, physico-mechanical, durability, life cycle assessment and thermal properties of restoration mortars reinforced with wool fibers and containing pumice powder in place of slaked lime at 0, 25, and 50 % replacement rates. The three percentages of wool fibers by volume that were used in this investigation were 0, 0.25 and 0.50 %. It was also investigated how well the combinations held up to high temperatures, dry shrinkage, and sorptivity. Microstructural analysis of the mixtures were made based on SEM. The findings indicated that the mixture with 50 % pumice powder and 0 %wool fibers showed the best compressive strength performance, exhibiting a strength gain of approximately 953 and 643 % in comparison to the control mixture at 28 and 90 days, respectively. The same mixture also demonstrated the lowest sorptivity and dry shrinkage, while the reference blend exhibited the lowest thermal conductivity. The mixture with 50 %PP and 0.50 %wool fibers showed the best high temperature performance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生态高效石灰/浮石砂浆与羊毛遗产修复:生命周期和节能
目前,40%的二氧化碳排放和能源消耗来自建筑行业。在评估建筑的可持续性和能源效率时,除了隔热水平和能源要求外,主要能源消耗、二氧化碳减排和所用材料的环境友好性目前也被考虑在内。因此,优化生态材料在建筑中的使用是至关重要的,以使其尽可能可持续。以熟石灰和浮石粉为粘结剂,考察了9种不同类型的羊毛纤维增强砂浆的和易性。本研究评估了用羊毛纤维增强和用浮石粉代替熟石灰在0、25%和50%替换率下的修复砂浆的新鲜度、物理力学、耐久性、生命周期评估和热性能。羊毛纤维的体积百分比分别为0、0.25和0.50%。研究人员还调查了这些组合在高温、干收缩和吸附性方面的表现。利用扫描电镜对混合物进行了显微组织分析。结果表明,含有50%浮石粉和0%羊毛纤维的混合料具有最佳的抗压强度性能,在28天和90天的强度分别比对照混合物增加了约953%和643%。同样的混合物也表现出最低的吸附率和干收缩率,而参考共混物表现出最低的导热性。含50% PP和0.50%羊毛的混纺纤维的高温性能最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Collective decision-making in energy transitions: A systematic review and a way forward Advancements in superstructures design and solver approaches for heat and mass exchange network synthesis Recent advances for thermal management of electronic devices: A state-of-the-art review A state-of-the-art review on decarbonizing aerospace manufacturing with life cycle sustainability assessment Power-to-protein: Convergent carbon capture, renewable energy, and microbial biomanufacturing for sustainable food security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1