Eco-compensation for Farmers’ cultivated land protection based on Field-Habitus theory

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113319
Ruofang Luan , Gaohui Wen , Xianhui Hu , Xiaxia Lin , Chaozheng Zhang
{"title":"Eco-compensation for Farmers’ cultivated land protection based on Field-Habitus theory","authors":"Ruofang Luan ,&nbsp;Gaohui Wen ,&nbsp;Xianhui Hu ,&nbsp;Xiaxia Lin ,&nbsp;Chaozheng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agricultural nonpoint pollution (ANP) increasingly threatens cultivated land sustainability, necessitating precise eco-compensation mechanisms to incentivize farmers’ adoption of cultivated land protection (CLP) practices. Using choice experiment and a random parameter logit model with 600 farmers in Changde City, China, this study integrates capital-habitus framework to analyze willingness to accept compensation (WTA) drivers. The results reveal that: (1) Key CLP practices, reducing chemical fertilizer or pesticide application, adopting soil testing-fertilization technology, full waste recycling, income and ecological awareness, significantly increase farmers’ WTA for CLP; (2) Capital endowment critically influenced preferences: households with higher proportions of laborers and greater reliance on kinship networks exhibited reduced compensation acceptance tendencies. Conversely, agricultural producers who participated in a greater number of agrotechnical training courses were significantly more willing to engage in CLP compensation practices. (3) The total eco-compensation for CLP ranges from RMB 3393.17/hm<sup>2</sup> to RMB 5343.17/hm<sup>2</sup>. Moreover, different selection attributes correspond to different eco-compensation amounts. This study recommends implementing tiered compensation schemes with bundled incentives, augmenting farmers’ capital endowments, and raising ecological cognition to optimize engagement in arable land protection. The proposed framework offers a transferable paradigm for harmonizing agricultural productivity with environmental stewardship in smallholder-dominated agricultural systems, providing actionable insights for policy formulation in China and other developing regions facing the productivity-ecosystem preservation preservation trade-off.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 113319"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2500250X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural nonpoint pollution (ANP) increasingly threatens cultivated land sustainability, necessitating precise eco-compensation mechanisms to incentivize farmers’ adoption of cultivated land protection (CLP) practices. Using choice experiment and a random parameter logit model with 600 farmers in Changde City, China, this study integrates capital-habitus framework to analyze willingness to accept compensation (WTA) drivers. The results reveal that: (1) Key CLP practices, reducing chemical fertilizer or pesticide application, adopting soil testing-fertilization technology, full waste recycling, income and ecological awareness, significantly increase farmers’ WTA for CLP; (2) Capital endowment critically influenced preferences: households with higher proportions of laborers and greater reliance on kinship networks exhibited reduced compensation acceptance tendencies. Conversely, agricultural producers who participated in a greater number of agrotechnical training courses were significantly more willing to engage in CLP compensation practices. (3) The total eco-compensation for CLP ranges from RMB 3393.17/hm2 to RMB 5343.17/hm2. Moreover, different selection attributes correspond to different eco-compensation amounts. This study recommends implementing tiered compensation schemes with bundled incentives, augmenting farmers’ capital endowments, and raising ecological cognition to optimize engagement in arable land protection. The proposed framework offers a transferable paradigm for harmonizing agricultural productivity with environmental stewardship in smallholder-dominated agricultural systems, providing actionable insights for policy formulation in China and other developing regions facing the productivity-ecosystem preservation preservation trade-off.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于田间习性理论的农民耕地保护生态补偿方案
农业面源污染(ANP)日益威胁耕地的可持续性,需要精确的生态补偿机制来激励农民采取耕地保护(CLP)措施。采用选择实验和随机参数logit模型,结合资本-习惯框架对常德市600名农民的接受补偿意愿进行分析。结果表明:(1)减少化肥或农药施用、采用土壤试肥技术、废弃物充分回收利用、提高收入和提高生态意识等关键措施显著提高了农户对CLP的WTA;(2)资本禀赋对偏好有重要影响,劳动者比例越高、亲属网络依赖程度越高的家庭,其补偿接受倾向越低。相反,参与农业技术培训课程越多的农业生产者,其参与中电补偿实践的意愿明显越高。(3) CLP生态补偿总量在3393.17 ~ 5343.17元/hm2之间。不同的选择属性对应不同的生态补偿金额。本研究建议实施分层补偿和捆绑激励,增加农民资本禀赋,提高生态认知,优化参与耕地保护。该框架为在小农主导的农业系统中协调农业生产力与环境管理提供了一个可转移的范例,为中国和其他面临生产力与生态系统保护权衡的发展中地区制定政策提供了可行的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
期刊最新文献
Revealing the relationship between storm surge risks and coastal urbanization characteristics under sea level rise How to estimate overall population trends when sites show varying population counts over time? Shift in plant resource use strategies buffers against aridity-driven declines in grassland ecosystem multifunctionality Periphyton pigment shifts in lakes with varying water colour: a possible monitoring method for freshwater Browning Balancing economic development and forest ecosystem services: Multi-scale spatial land use optimization modeling for Guiyang, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1