M. Kim , S.M. Rubright , T. Pham , M. Fuller , A.S. Habib
{"title":"Intrathecal morphine 100 µg versus 150 µg for post-cesarean delivery analgesia: a retrospective cohort study (2020–2022)","authors":"M. Kim , S.M. Rubright , T. Pham , M. Fuller , A.S. Habib","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In the context of multimodal analgesia, the optimal dose of intrathecal morphine (ITM) for post-cesarean analgesia remains unclear. In January 2022, the dose of ITM was reduced from 150 µg to 100 µg without other changes in our analgesic regimen with the assumption that ITM 100 µg provides comparable analgesia to ITM 150 µg with fewer opioid-related side effects.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective cohort study including cases from January 2020 through October 2022, we identified all cesarean delivery cases with a neuraxial technique with ITM. The primary outcome was oral opioid use in the first 24 hours. Opioid use in oral morphine equivalents (OME) was compared using zero-inflated negative binomial models, and antiemetic and antipruritic use was compared using logistic regression models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 3293 cases included in the analysis (1689 with ITM 150 µg and 1604 with ITM 100 µg). There was no significant difference between the groups in the primary outcome of opioid consumption in the first 24 hours in both the unadjusted and adjusted analysis [mean ratio (95% CI) = 1.03 (0.96 to 1.11); <em>P</em> = 0.373]. With ITM 100 µg, antiemetic use was less likely [OR = 0.65 (0.55 to 0.76)] and so was treatment for pruritus [OR = 0.16 (0.12 to 0.21)] compared with ITM 150 µg.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>When used with multimodal analgesia, a lower ITM dose of 100 µg provided comparable analgesia with lower incidence of opioid-related side effects compared with an ITM dose of 150 µg.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 104348"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X25000202","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
In the context of multimodal analgesia, the optimal dose of intrathecal morphine (ITM) for post-cesarean analgesia remains unclear. In January 2022, the dose of ITM was reduced from 150 µg to 100 µg without other changes in our analgesic regimen with the assumption that ITM 100 µg provides comparable analgesia to ITM 150 µg with fewer opioid-related side effects.
Methods
In this retrospective cohort study including cases from January 2020 through October 2022, we identified all cesarean delivery cases with a neuraxial technique with ITM. The primary outcome was oral opioid use in the first 24 hours. Opioid use in oral morphine equivalents (OME) was compared using zero-inflated negative binomial models, and antiemetic and antipruritic use was compared using logistic regression models.
Results
There were 3293 cases included in the analysis (1689 with ITM 150 µg and 1604 with ITM 100 µg). There was no significant difference between the groups in the primary outcome of opioid consumption in the first 24 hours in both the unadjusted and adjusted analysis [mean ratio (95% CI) = 1.03 (0.96 to 1.11); P = 0.373]. With ITM 100 µg, antiemetic use was less likely [OR = 0.65 (0.55 to 0.76)] and so was treatment for pruritus [OR = 0.16 (0.12 to 0.21)] compared with ITM 150 µg.
Conclusions
When used with multimodal analgesia, a lower ITM dose of 100 µg provided comparable analgesia with lower incidence of opioid-related side effects compared with an ITM dose of 150 µg.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient.
• Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered.
• The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia.
• Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome.
The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.