Networks and Artistic Status Orders in Cultural Fields: The Evolution of Hollywood Filmmaking

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 0 LITERATURE Poetics Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.poetic.2025.101985
Mark Wittek , Katharina Burgdorf
{"title":"Networks and Artistic Status Orders in Cultural Fields: The Evolution of Hollywood Filmmaking","authors":"Mark Wittek ,&nbsp;Katharina Burgdorf","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2025.101985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How do status orders emerge in cultural fields? Our study sheds new light on this question by investigating the interplay of networks and status among Hollywood filmmakers from 1920 to 2000. Information on artistic references and collaborations of more than 9,500 filmmakers retrieved from the Internet Movie Database (IMDb) allows us to examine long-term changes in the social organization of this cultural field. Our findings suggest that the distribution of social recognition—measured by filmmakers’ prominence in collaborative ties and artistic references—became more stratified as the field grew. Furthermore, collaborations increasingly exhibited segregation according to filmmakers’ artistic status during the New Hollywood era (1960–1980). This period was characterized by the rising prominence of a new generation of filmmakers who established film as an art form in the U.S. This article shows that contextual characteristics, such as a field's size and institutional environment, can foster or impede stratification and segregation in collaborative networks among cultural producers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47900,"journal":{"name":"Poetics","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 101985"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poetics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X25000154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do status orders emerge in cultural fields? Our study sheds new light on this question by investigating the interplay of networks and status among Hollywood filmmakers from 1920 to 2000. Information on artistic references and collaborations of more than 9,500 filmmakers retrieved from the Internet Movie Database (IMDb) allows us to examine long-term changes in the social organization of this cultural field. Our findings suggest that the distribution of social recognition—measured by filmmakers’ prominence in collaborative ties and artistic references—became more stratified as the field grew. Furthermore, collaborations increasingly exhibited segregation according to filmmakers’ artistic status during the New Hollywood era (1960–1980). This period was characterized by the rising prominence of a new generation of filmmakers who established film as an art form in the U.S. This article shows that contextual characteristics, such as a field's size and institutional environment, can foster or impede stratification and segregation in collaborative networks among cultural producers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化领域中的网络与艺术地位秩序:好莱坞电影制作的演变
地位秩序是如何在文化领域中出现的?我们的研究通过调查从1920年到2000年好莱坞电影制作人的网络和地位的相互作用,为这个问题提供了新的视角。从互联网电影数据库(IMDb)中检索的9500多名电影制作人的艺术参考和合作信息使我们能够研究这一文化领域的社会组织的长期变化。我们的研究结果表明,随着电影领域的发展,社会认可的分布——通过电影制作人在合作关系和艺术参考中的突出程度来衡量——变得更加分层。此外,在新好莱坞时代(1960-1980),根据电影制作人的艺术地位,合作越来越表现出隔离。这一时期的特点是新一代电影人的崛起,他们将电影确立为美国的一种艺术形式。本文表明,背景特征,如一个领域的规模和制度环境,可以促进或阻碍文化生产者之间合作网络中的分层和隔离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Poetics
Poetics Multiple-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Poetics is an interdisciplinary journal of theoretical and empirical research on culture, the media and the arts. Particularly welcome are papers that make an original contribution to the major disciplines - sociology, psychology, media and communication studies, and economics - within which promising lines of research on culture, media and the arts have been developed.
期刊最新文献
Preaching to the converted: Cultural intermediaries and cultural consumer behavior Editorial Board Watching scripted fiction: Repertoires of co-viewing, time, and attention to scripted series and movies in Australia Reader-character identity interdependence: An empirical investigation of congruence in identity and reading The conservative revolution revisited: The blending of art and commerce in four Western publishing fields
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1