Selecting the severest seismic design ground motions for cut-and-cover underground structures

IF 8.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Underground Space Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.undsp.2024.05.004
Wei Yu , Zhi-Yi Chen , Zhi-Qian Liu
{"title":"Selecting the severest seismic design ground motions for cut-and-cover underground structures","authors":"Wei Yu ,&nbsp;Zhi-Yi Chen ,&nbsp;Zhi-Qian Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.undsp.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper proposes an innovative method for selecting the severest design ground motions based on overall damage characterization of underground structures. The selection procedure is elaborated using 4749 ground motions, exemplifying various forms of underground structures in class III sites. Initially, an overall damage index, predicated on dual-parameters of deformation and hysteretic energy dissipation, is proposed as an engineering demand parameter to quantitatively depict the failure state of underground structures. Subsequently, given the inadequacy of a single intensity measure in evaluating the damage of underground structures, composite intensity measures with higher correlation to the index are constructed using partial least squares regression method. The composite intensity measures served as the damage potential characterization parameter for ground motions concerning underground structures. Consequently, alternative databases of severest design ground motions are derived through these composite intensity measures. The ground motions in this alternative database are employed as inputs for nonlinear dynamic analysis of underground structures. The severest design ground motions are identified by ranking the overall damage index to underground structures. Finally, a comparison with traditional selecting method demonstrates that the proposed method yields more accurate results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48505,"journal":{"name":"Underground Space","volume":"22 ","pages":"Pages 208-224"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Underground Space","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967424001120","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper proposes an innovative method for selecting the severest design ground motions based on overall damage characterization of underground structures. The selection procedure is elaborated using 4749 ground motions, exemplifying various forms of underground structures in class III sites. Initially, an overall damage index, predicated on dual-parameters of deformation and hysteretic energy dissipation, is proposed as an engineering demand parameter to quantitatively depict the failure state of underground structures. Subsequently, given the inadequacy of a single intensity measure in evaluating the damage of underground structures, composite intensity measures with higher correlation to the index are constructed using partial least squares regression method. The composite intensity measures served as the damage potential characterization parameter for ground motions concerning underground structures. Consequently, alternative databases of severest design ground motions are derived through these composite intensity measures. The ground motions in this alternative database are employed as inputs for nonlinear dynamic analysis of underground structures. The severest design ground motions are identified by ranking the overall damage index to underground structures. Finally, a comparison with traditional selecting method demonstrates that the proposed method yields more accurate results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文提出了一种基于地下结构总体破坏特征的最严重设计地面运动选择创新方法。利用 4749 次地面运动对选择程序进行了阐述,这些地面运动体现了 III 类场地中各种形式的地下结构。首先,提出了基于变形和滞回耗能双重参数的整体损伤指数,作为工程需求参数,定量描述地下结构的破坏状态。随后,考虑到单一强度指标在评估地下结构破坏方面的不足,采用偏最小二乘回归法构建了与指数相关性更高的复合强度指标。综合烈度指标可作为地下结构地震动的潜在破坏特征参数。因此,通过这些综合烈度量度得出了最严重设计地面运动的替代数据库。该替代数据库中的地面运动可用作地下结构非线性动态分析的输入。通过对地下结构的总体破坏指数进行排序,确定最严重的设计地面运动。最后,通过与传统的选择方法进行比较,证明所提出的方法能得到更准确的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Underground Space
Underground Space ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Underground Space is an open access international journal without article processing charges (APC) committed to serving as a scientific forum for researchers and practitioners in the field of underground engineering. The journal welcomes manuscripts that deal with original theories, methods, technologies, and important applications throughout the life-cycle of underground projects, including planning, design, operation and maintenance, disaster prevention, and demolition. The journal is particularly interested in manuscripts related to the latest development of smart underground engineering from the perspectives of resilience, resources saving, environmental friendliness, humanity, and artificial intelligence. The manuscripts are expected to have significant innovation and potential impact in the field of underground engineering, and should have clear association with or application in underground projects.
期刊最新文献
Field monitoring and instrumentation in microtunnelling/pipe jacking: A review and future directions Test and field application of fracture evolution of large-span tunnel under NPR bolt compensation support system Overall smoke control performance using naturally ventilated shafts in tunnel fires with multiple fire sources Experimental study on the modulus of soil reaction for plastic pipes buried in lightweight cellular concrete backfill Experimental investigation and limit analysis of shield tunnel face failure mechanism in sand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1