Assessing the efficacy of wildlife underpasses in mitigating amphibian road mortality: A case study from the northeastern United States

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Journal for Nature Conservation Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126901
Matthew R. Marcelino , Steve G. Parren , Brittany A. Mosher
{"title":"Assessing the efficacy of wildlife underpasses in mitigating amphibian road mortality: A case study from the northeastern United States","authors":"Matthew R. Marcelino ,&nbsp;Steve G. Parren ,&nbsp;Brittany A. Mosher","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Roads pose significant threats to wildlife populations worldwide, leading to habitat fragmentation and high mortality rates among various species. Mitigation strategies such as wildlife underpasses have been implemented to alleviate these impacts, yet few studies have assessed their effectiveness before and after implementation. We conducted a case study in the northeastern United States to evaluate the efficacy of a wildlife underpass complex in mitigating amphibian road mortality. The study area encompassed a 1.3 km stretch of road, where two underpasses were constructed to facilitate amphibian passage. Through a comprehensive survey spanning five years pre-construction and seven years post-construction, we collected data on amphibian mortality and environmental factors. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess changes in mortality rates before and after underpass construction using a before-after control-impact design. Our findings indicate a substantial reduction in mortality across the entire amphibian community and for non-arboreal amphibians within treatment areas post-construction. While arboreal amphibian mortality decreased, the difference was not statistically significant. The underpasses effectively facilitated amphibian movement. Overall, our study provides empirical evidence of the effectiveness of wildlife underpasses in reducing amphibian road mortality, highlighting them as a potentially important conservation action. These findings underscore the significance of incorporating underpass structures into transportation planning and infrastructure development to mitigate negative impacts on wildlife populations. Moreover, our study contributes valuable insights for future research and informs policy initiatives aimed at enhancing habitat connectivity and safeguarding vulnerable amphibian populations in environments bisected by roadways.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 126901"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125000780","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Roads pose significant threats to wildlife populations worldwide, leading to habitat fragmentation and high mortality rates among various species. Mitigation strategies such as wildlife underpasses have been implemented to alleviate these impacts, yet few studies have assessed their effectiveness before and after implementation. We conducted a case study in the northeastern United States to evaluate the efficacy of a wildlife underpass complex in mitigating amphibian road mortality. The study area encompassed a 1.3 km stretch of road, where two underpasses were constructed to facilitate amphibian passage. Through a comprehensive survey spanning five years pre-construction and seven years post-construction, we collected data on amphibian mortality and environmental factors. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess changes in mortality rates before and after underpass construction using a before-after control-impact design. Our findings indicate a substantial reduction in mortality across the entire amphibian community and for non-arboreal amphibians within treatment areas post-construction. While arboreal amphibian mortality decreased, the difference was not statistically significant. The underpasses effectively facilitated amphibian movement. Overall, our study provides empirical evidence of the effectiveness of wildlife underpasses in reducing amphibian road mortality, highlighting them as a potentially important conservation action. These findings underscore the significance of incorporating underpass structures into transportation planning and infrastructure development to mitigate negative impacts on wildlife populations. Moreover, our study contributes valuable insights for future research and informs policy initiatives aimed at enhancing habitat connectivity and safeguarding vulnerable amphibian populations in environments bisected by roadways.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估野生动物地下通道在降低两栖动物公路死亡率方面的功效:美国东北部案例研究
道路对世界各地的野生动物种群构成重大威胁,导致栖息地破碎化和各种物种的高死亡率。为了减轻这些影响,已经实施了诸如野生动物地下通道之类的缓解战略,但很少有研究评估其实施前后的有效性。我们在美国东北部进行了一项案例研究,以评估野生动物地下通道综合体在减轻两栖动物道路死亡率方面的功效。研究区域包括一条1.3公里长的道路,其中修建了两条地下通道,以方便两栖动物通行。通过建设前5年和建设后7年的综合调查,收集了两栖动物死亡率和环境因素的数据。采用前后控制影响设计,采用线性混合效应模型评估地下通道建设前后死亡率的变化。我们的研究结果表明,在整个两栖动物群落和治疗区内的非树栖两栖动物的死亡率在施工后大幅降低。虽然树栖两栖动物死亡率下降,但差异无统计学意义。地下通道有效地促进了两栖动物的活动。总的来说,我们的研究提供了野生动物地下通道在降低两栖动物道路死亡率方面的有效性的经验证据,强调了它们是一项潜在的重要保护行动。这些发现强调了将地下通道结构纳入交通规划和基础设施发展以减轻对野生动物种群的负面影响的重要性。此外,我们的研究为未来的研究提供了有价值的见解,并为旨在加强栖息地连通性和保护被道路一分为二的环境中脆弱两栖动物种群的政策举措提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Nature Conservation
Journal for Nature Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation. Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Quantification of the overall protection of threatened fauna and flora species from France, globally and across territories and taxonomic groups Fragmentation dynamics in the Atlantic forest Green Corridor of Misiones, Argentina: Implications for conservation planning and policy effectiveness Serval population status in the Greater Kafue Ecosystem, Zambia Investigating the threats of sustainable ecotourism by integrating the norms with GIS and remotely sensed data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1