Matthew R. Marcelino , Steve G. Parren , Brittany A. Mosher
{"title":"Assessing the efficacy of wildlife underpasses in mitigating amphibian road mortality: A case study from the northeastern United States","authors":"Matthew R. Marcelino , Steve G. Parren , Brittany A. Mosher","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Roads pose significant threats to wildlife populations worldwide, leading to habitat fragmentation and high mortality rates among various species. Mitigation strategies such as wildlife underpasses have been implemented to alleviate these impacts, yet few studies have assessed their effectiveness before and after implementation. We conducted a case study in the northeastern United States to evaluate the efficacy of a wildlife underpass complex in mitigating amphibian road mortality. The study area encompassed a 1.3 km stretch of road, where two underpasses were constructed to facilitate amphibian passage. Through a comprehensive survey spanning five years pre-construction and seven years post-construction, we collected data on amphibian mortality and environmental factors. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess changes in mortality rates before and after underpass construction using a before-after control-impact design. Our findings indicate a substantial reduction in mortality across the entire amphibian community and for non-arboreal amphibians within treatment areas post-construction. While arboreal amphibian mortality decreased, the difference was not statistically significant. The underpasses effectively facilitated amphibian movement. Overall, our study provides empirical evidence of the effectiveness of wildlife underpasses in reducing amphibian road mortality, highlighting them as a potentially important conservation action. These findings underscore the significance of incorporating underpass structures into transportation planning and infrastructure development to mitigate negative impacts on wildlife populations. Moreover, our study contributes valuable insights for future research and informs policy initiatives aimed at enhancing habitat connectivity and safeguarding vulnerable amphibian populations in environments bisected by roadways.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 126901"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125000780","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Roads pose significant threats to wildlife populations worldwide, leading to habitat fragmentation and high mortality rates among various species. Mitigation strategies such as wildlife underpasses have been implemented to alleviate these impacts, yet few studies have assessed their effectiveness before and after implementation. We conducted a case study in the northeastern United States to evaluate the efficacy of a wildlife underpass complex in mitigating amphibian road mortality. The study area encompassed a 1.3 km stretch of road, where two underpasses were constructed to facilitate amphibian passage. Through a comprehensive survey spanning five years pre-construction and seven years post-construction, we collected data on amphibian mortality and environmental factors. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess changes in mortality rates before and after underpass construction using a before-after control-impact design. Our findings indicate a substantial reduction in mortality across the entire amphibian community and for non-arboreal amphibians within treatment areas post-construction. While arboreal amphibian mortality decreased, the difference was not statistically significant. The underpasses effectively facilitated amphibian movement. Overall, our study provides empirical evidence of the effectiveness of wildlife underpasses in reducing amphibian road mortality, highlighting them as a potentially important conservation action. These findings underscore the significance of incorporating underpass structures into transportation planning and infrastructure development to mitigate negative impacts on wildlife populations. Moreover, our study contributes valuable insights for future research and informs policy initiatives aimed at enhancing habitat connectivity and safeguarding vulnerable amphibian populations in environments bisected by roadways.
IF 15.8 1区 医学PLoS MedicinePub Date : 2021-10-21DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003807
George N Ioannou, Jacqueline M Ferguson, Ann M O'Hare, Amy S B Bohnert, Lisa I Backus, Edward J Boyko, Thomas F Osborne, Matthew L Maciejewski, C Barrett Bowling, Denise M Hynes, Theodore J Iwashyna, Melody Saysana, Pamela Green, Kristin Berry
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation.
Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.