Solving the enigma: Enhancing faithfulness and comprehensibility in explanations of deep networks

Michail Mamalakis , Antonios Mamalakis , Ingrid Agartz , Lynn Egeland Mørch-Johnsen , Graham K. Murray , John Suckling , Pietro Lio
{"title":"Solving the enigma: Enhancing faithfulness and comprehensibility in explanations of deep networks","authors":"Michail Mamalakis ,&nbsp;Antonios Mamalakis ,&nbsp;Ingrid Agartz ,&nbsp;Lynn Egeland Mørch-Johnsen ,&nbsp;Graham K. Murray ,&nbsp;John Suckling ,&nbsp;Pietro Lio","doi":"10.1016/j.aiopen.2025.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The accelerated progress of artificial intelligence (AI) has popularized deep learning models across various domains, yet their inherent opacity poses challenges, particularly in critical fields like healthcare, medicine, and the geosciences. Explainable AI (XAI) has emerged to shed light on these ’black box’ models, aiding in deciphering their decision-making processes. However, different XAI methods often produce significantly different explanations, leading to high inter-method variability that increases uncertainty and undermines trust in deep networks’ predictions. In this study, we address this challenge by introducing a novel framework designed to enhance the explainability of deep networks through a dual focus on maximizing both accuracy and comprehensibility in the explanations. Our framework integrates outputs from multiple established XAI methods and leverages a non-linear neural network model, termed the ‘Explanation optimizer,’ to construct a unified, optimal explanation. The optimizer uses two primary metrics — faithfulness and complexity — to evaluate the quality of the explanations. Faithfulness measures the accuracy with which the explanation reflects the network’s decision-making, while complexity assesses the comprehensibility of the explanation. By balancing these metrics, the optimizer provides explanations that are both accurate and accessible, addressing a central limitation in current XAI methods. Through experiments on multi-class and binary classification tasks in both 2D object and 3D neuroscience imaging, we validate the efficacy of our approach. Our explanation optimizer achieved superior faithfulness scores, averaging 155% and 63% higher than the best-performing individual XAI methods in the 3D and 2D applications, respectively, while also reducing complexity to enhance comprehensibility. These results demonstrate that optimal explanations based on specific quality criteria are achievable, offering a solution to the issue of inter-method variability in the current XAI literature and supporting more trustworthy deep network predictions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100068,"journal":{"name":"AI Open","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 70-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266665102500004X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The accelerated progress of artificial intelligence (AI) has popularized deep learning models across various domains, yet their inherent opacity poses challenges, particularly in critical fields like healthcare, medicine, and the geosciences. Explainable AI (XAI) has emerged to shed light on these ’black box’ models, aiding in deciphering their decision-making processes. However, different XAI methods often produce significantly different explanations, leading to high inter-method variability that increases uncertainty and undermines trust in deep networks’ predictions. In this study, we address this challenge by introducing a novel framework designed to enhance the explainability of deep networks through a dual focus on maximizing both accuracy and comprehensibility in the explanations. Our framework integrates outputs from multiple established XAI methods and leverages a non-linear neural network model, termed the ‘Explanation optimizer,’ to construct a unified, optimal explanation. The optimizer uses two primary metrics — faithfulness and complexity — to evaluate the quality of the explanations. Faithfulness measures the accuracy with which the explanation reflects the network’s decision-making, while complexity assesses the comprehensibility of the explanation. By balancing these metrics, the optimizer provides explanations that are both accurate and accessible, addressing a central limitation in current XAI methods. Through experiments on multi-class and binary classification tasks in both 2D object and 3D neuroscience imaging, we validate the efficacy of our approach. Our explanation optimizer achieved superior faithfulness scores, averaging 155% and 63% higher than the best-performing individual XAI methods in the 3D and 2D applications, respectively, while also reducing complexity to enhance comprehensibility. These results demonstrate that optimal explanations based on specific quality criteria are achievable, offering a solution to the issue of inter-method variability in the current XAI literature and supporting more trustworthy deep network predictions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解谜:增强深度网络解释的忠实性和可理解性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
45.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multimodal marvels of deep learning in medical diagnosis using image, speech, and text: A comprehensive review of COVID-19 detection Optimal RoPE extension via Bayesian Optimization for training-free length generalization ChatLLM network: More brains, more intelligence Methodologies and their comparison in complex compound aspect-based sentiment analysis: A survey Solving the enigma: Enhancing faithfulness and comprehensibility in explanations of deep networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1