Frequency, correlates and outcomes of Benzodiazepine use during Cariprazine treatment: A pooled post-hoc analysis from four 6-week, placebo-controlled trials in patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Neuropsychopharmacology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2025.02.010
Christoph U. Correll , Réka Csehi , Károly Acsai , Ágota Barabássy
{"title":"Frequency, correlates and outcomes of Benzodiazepine use during Cariprazine treatment: A pooled post-hoc analysis from four 6-week, placebo-controlled trials in patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia","authors":"Christoph U. Correll ,&nbsp;Réka Csehi ,&nbsp;Károly Acsai ,&nbsp;Ágota Barabássy","doi":"10.1016/j.euroneuro.2025.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given the frequent prescription of benzodiazepines (BZDs) as adjunctive treatment to antipsychotics, this study aimed to uncover how BZD use affects treatment outcomes with cariprazine (CAR).</div><div>This post-hoc analysis used pooled data from four placebo-controlled trials in patients with acute schizophrenia. Efficacy evaluations involved changes from baseline to Week 6 on PANSS Total Score, Marder Positive Factor Score, Excitement Component Subscale Score, and Marder Anxiety Single Item Score. Safety evaluations focused on extrapyramidal symptoms and akathisia. Comparisons were made between CAR alone vs. placebo (PLB) alone; CAR+BZD vs. PLB+BZD; CAR alone vs. CAR+BZD; and PLB alone vs. PLB+BZD.</div><div>Data from 1643 patients were analysed (CAR only=943; CAR+BZD=132; PLB only=475; PLB+BZD=93). CAR alone yielded significantly greater improvement on all measures than PLB alone. CAR+BZD yielded significantly greater improvements in overall schizophrenia symptoms than PLB+BZD. CAR alone showed greater improvements in overall, positive, and anxiety symptoms compared to CAR+BZD. PLB alone yielded significantly greater improvements in positive and anxiety symptoms than PLB+BZD. Anxiety and agitation were the leading reasons for BZD administration. CAR was associated with more akathisia and EPS in both the non-BZD and BZD-user groups than PLB.</div><div>The results support the superior efficacy of CAR with or without BZD co-treatment for total and positive symptoms of schizophrenia compared to PLB with or without BZD use. These findings suggest BZDs should be used for emergent symptoms like anxiety or agitation, rather than core schizophrenia symptoms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12049,"journal":{"name":"European Neuropsychopharmacology","volume":"94 ","pages":"Pages 76-83"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Neuropsychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924977X25000422","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the frequent prescription of benzodiazepines (BZDs) as adjunctive treatment to antipsychotics, this study aimed to uncover how BZD use affects treatment outcomes with cariprazine (CAR).
This post-hoc analysis used pooled data from four placebo-controlled trials in patients with acute schizophrenia. Efficacy evaluations involved changes from baseline to Week 6 on PANSS Total Score, Marder Positive Factor Score, Excitement Component Subscale Score, and Marder Anxiety Single Item Score. Safety evaluations focused on extrapyramidal symptoms and akathisia. Comparisons were made between CAR alone vs. placebo (PLB) alone; CAR+BZD vs. PLB+BZD; CAR alone vs. CAR+BZD; and PLB alone vs. PLB+BZD.
Data from 1643 patients were analysed (CAR only=943; CAR+BZD=132; PLB only=475; PLB+BZD=93). CAR alone yielded significantly greater improvement on all measures than PLB alone. CAR+BZD yielded significantly greater improvements in overall schizophrenia symptoms than PLB+BZD. CAR alone showed greater improvements in overall, positive, and anxiety symptoms compared to CAR+BZD. PLB alone yielded significantly greater improvements in positive and anxiety symptoms than PLB+BZD. Anxiety and agitation were the leading reasons for BZD administration. CAR was associated with more akathisia and EPS in both the non-BZD and BZD-user groups than PLB.
The results support the superior efficacy of CAR with or without BZD co-treatment for total and positive symptoms of schizophrenia compared to PLB with or without BZD use. These findings suggest BZDs should be used for emergent symptoms like anxiety or agitation, rather than core schizophrenia symptoms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡吡嗪治疗期间苯二氮卓类药物使用的频率、相关因素和结果:一项针对精神分裂症急性加重患者的4项为期6周的安慰剂对照试验的汇总事后分析
鉴于苯二氮卓类药物(BZDs)作为抗精神病药物的辅助治疗的频繁处方,本研究旨在揭示BZD的使用如何影响卡吡嗪(CAR)的治疗结果。这项事后分析使用了来自急性精神分裂症患者的四项安慰剂对照试验的汇总数据。疗效评估包括从基线到第6周PANSS总分、Marder积极因素评分、兴奋成分分量量表评分和Marder焦虑单项评分的变化。安全性评价的重点是锥体外系症状和静坐症。比较单独CAR与单独安慰剂(PLB);CAR+BZD vs. PLB+BZD;CAR单独vs. CAR+BZD;PLB单独vs. PLB+BZD。分析了1643例患者的数据(仅CAR =943;汽车+ BZD = 132;拉钮只= 475;拉钮+ BZD = 93)。单独使用CAR比单独使用PLB产生了更大的改善。与PLB+BZD相比,CAR+BZD对整体精神分裂症症状的改善显著更大。与CAR+BZD相比,CAR单独治疗在总体、阳性和焦虑症状方面表现出更大的改善。与PLB+BZD相比,PLB单独治疗对阳性症状和焦虑症状的改善明显更大。焦虑和躁动是服用BZD的主要原因。与PLB相比,CAR在非bzd和bzd用户组中都与更多的静坐症和EPS相关。结果支持CAR与BZD或不BZD联合治疗精神分裂症总症状和阳性症状比使用或不使用BZD的PLB更优越的疗效。这些发现表明,bzd应该用于焦虑或躁动等紧急症状,而不是核心精神分裂症症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Neuropsychopharmacology
European Neuropsychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
730
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: European Neuropsychopharmacology is the official publication of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP). In accordance with the mission of the College, the journal focuses on clinical and basic science contributions that advance our understanding of brain function and human behaviour and enable translation into improved treatments and enhanced public health impact in psychiatry. Recent years have been characterized by exciting advances in basic knowledge and available experimental techniques in neuroscience and genomics. However, clinical translation of these findings has not been as rapid. The journal aims to narrow this gap by promoting findings that are expected to have a major impact on both our understanding of the biological bases of mental disorders and the development and improvement of treatments, ideally paving the way for prevention and recovery.
期刊最新文献
Shared and distinct effects of mood stabilizers on epigenetic machinery gene expression: an exploratory study in HeLa cells Perinatal bipolar disorder as a critical risk window: rationale for hospitalization at home on this population Lithium response in families can inform the selection of long-term treatment of bipolar disorder Age-stratified associations between severe mental illness, dementia, and ischemic stroke: findings from the PADRIS-PRESTO cohort A call for the systematic assessment of sexual adverse events in ketamine and esketamine trials and clinical practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1