Closing the gap in kidney disease: validating the reporting of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander identification in a clinical quality registry using linked data

IF 8.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medical Journal of Australia Pub Date : 2025-03-16 DOI:10.5694/mja2.52613
Heather J Baldwin, Nicole De La Mata, Grant Sara, Faye McMillan, Brett Biles, Jianyun Wu, Paul Lawton, Stephen McDonald, Angela C Webster
{"title":"Closing the gap in kidney disease: validating the reporting of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander identification in a clinical quality registry using linked data","authors":"Heather J Baldwin,&nbsp;Nicole De La Mata,&nbsp;Grant Sara,&nbsp;Faye McMillan,&nbsp;Brett Biles,&nbsp;Jianyun Wu,&nbsp;Paul Lawton,&nbsp;Stephen McDonald,&nbsp;Angela C Webster","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To examine the accuracy of the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), the population-based clinical quality registry for people with kidney failure, in identifying Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Population-based cohort study of reporting accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>New South Wales, 2006–2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Incident kidney failure patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\n \n <p>Sensitivity and specificity of identification of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people in ANZDATA compared with identification with Enhanced Reporting of Aboriginality (ERA) methods using linked health datasets.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 11 708 patients, 693 (5.9%) were identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people using ERA methods, with 484 recognised in ANZDATA. Overall ANZDATA sensitivity was 67.0% (95% CI, 63.3–70.5%), with high specificity (99.8%; 95% CI, 99.7–99.9%). Sensitivity was lowest for males (63.8%; 95% CI, 58.7–68.6), people aged under 18 years (45.0%; 95% CI, 23.1–68.5%) or over 65 years (61.7%; 95% CI, 53.8–69.2%), and those with greater socio-economic advantage (56.6%; 95% CI, 46.6–66.2%), living in major cities (53.8%; 95% CI, 48.0–59.5%) and with no comorbidities (47.7%; 95% CI, 37.0–58.6%). Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people identified in ANZDATA had lower rates of waitlisting for kidney transplantation (17.8% <i>v</i> 25.3%; <i>P</i> = 0.016) and receiving a kidney transplant (12.2% <i>v</i> 23.1%; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and a higher rate of death (56.0% <i>v</i> 44.5%; <i>P</i> = 0.004) compared with those not recognised in ANZDATA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people were under-reported in ANZDATA. There were multiple biases in characteristics and outcomes for people identified in ANZDATA compared with those identified by ERA using linked data. This highlights the importance of data integration as a quality improvement mechanism and identifying barriers to disclosure.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"222 5","pages":"240-248"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52613","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52613","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine the accuracy of the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), the population-based clinical quality registry for people with kidney failure, in identifying Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people.

Design

Population-based cohort study of reporting accuracy.

Setting

New South Wales, 2006–2020.

Participants

Incident kidney failure patients.

Main outcome measures

Sensitivity and specificity of identification of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people in ANZDATA compared with identification with Enhanced Reporting of Aboriginality (ERA) methods using linked health datasets.

Results

Of 11 708 patients, 693 (5.9%) were identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people using ERA methods, with 484 recognised in ANZDATA. Overall ANZDATA sensitivity was 67.0% (95% CI, 63.3–70.5%), with high specificity (99.8%; 95% CI, 99.7–99.9%). Sensitivity was lowest for males (63.8%; 95% CI, 58.7–68.6), people aged under 18 years (45.0%; 95% CI, 23.1–68.5%) or over 65 years (61.7%; 95% CI, 53.8–69.2%), and those with greater socio-economic advantage (56.6%; 95% CI, 46.6–66.2%), living in major cities (53.8%; 95% CI, 48.0–59.5%) and with no comorbidities (47.7%; 95% CI, 37.0–58.6%). Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people identified in ANZDATA had lower rates of waitlisting for kidney transplantation (17.8% v 25.3%; P = 0.016) and receiving a kidney transplant (12.2% v 23.1%; P < 0.001) and a higher rate of death (56.0% v 44.5%; P = 0.004) compared with those not recognised in ANZDATA.

Conclusion

Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people were under-reported in ANZDATA. There were multiple biases in characteristics and outcomes for people identified in ANZDATA compared with those identified by ERA using linked data. This highlights the importance of data integration as a quality improvement mechanism and identifying barriers to disclosure.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缩小肾脏疾病的差距:使用关联数据验证临床质量登记中土著和/或托雷斯海峡岛民的鉴定报告
目的检验澳大利亚和新西兰透析和移植登记处(ANZDATA)的准确性,该登记处是基于人群的肾衰竭患者临床质量登记处,用于识别土著和/或托雷斯海峡岛民。设计基于人群的报告准确性队列研究。2006-2020年,新南威尔士州。参与者事件肾衰竭患者。与使用关联健康数据集的增强土著报告(ERA)方法进行识别相比,ANZDATA中识别土著和/或托雷斯海峡岛民的敏感性和特异性。结果在1708例患者中,693例(5.9%)被ERA方法识别为原住民和/或托雷斯海峡岛民,其中484例在ANZDATA中被识别。ANZDATA的总体敏感性为67.0% (95% CI, 63.3-70.5%),具有高特异性(99.8%;95% ci, 99.7-99.9%)。男性敏感度最低(63.8%);95% CI, 58.7-68.6), 18岁以下人群(45.0%;95% CI, 23.1-68.5%)或65岁以上(61.7%;95% CI, 53.8-69.2%),以及具有更大社会经济优势的人(56.6%;95% CI, 46.6-66.2%),居住在大城市(53.8%;95% CI, 48.0-59.5%),无合并症(47.7%;95% ci, 37.0-58.6%)。ANZDATA中确定的原住民和/或托雷斯海峡岛民等待肾移植的比例较低(17.8% vs 25.3%;P = 0.016)和接受肾移植(12.2% vs 23.1%;P < 0.001)和更高的死亡率(56.0% vs 44.5%;P = 0.004),与ANZDATA未识别的患者相比。结论土著人和/或托雷斯海峡岛民在ANZDATA中被低报。与使用关联数据的ERA识别的人相比,在ANZDATA中识别的人的特征和结果存在多重偏差。这突出了数据整合作为一种质量改进机制和确定披露障碍的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
期刊最新文献
Advancing Inclusive Design Practice for Queer Youth Using Digital Technologies for Mental Health Awareness, Usage and Perceptions of Doxycycline Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (doxyPEP) for Prevention of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Australia: Insights From a National Cross-Sectional Survey Community Code Blue: The Sydney Jewish Community's Medical Preparations and Response to the Bondi Beach Terror Attack of December 2025 Genomic Newborn Screening: Verdict From an Australian Citizens’ Jury Deprescribing in Older People: A Clinical Practice Guideline Summary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1