Facilitators and barriers to generic and biosimilar medications in the Middle East and North Africa: insights from physicians and pharmacists-a systematic review.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1007/s00228-025-03819-5
Kefah Ali Alqawasmeh, Thomas Mason, Abigail Morris, Wael Hafez, Thekra Hasan, Sondos Taher, Rania Al Dweik
{"title":"Facilitators and barriers to generic and biosimilar medications in the Middle East and North Africa: insights from physicians and pharmacists-a systematic review.","authors":"Kefah Ali Alqawasmeh, Thomas Mason, Abigail Morris, Wael Hafez, Thekra Hasan, Sondos Taher, Rania Al Dweik","doi":"10.1007/s00228-025-03819-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The adoption of generic and biosimilar medications is crucial for improving healthcare accessibility and cost savings in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Understanding the factors that influence their acceptance is crucial for developing effective strategies for promoting their use.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review aimed to examine the facilitators and barriers identified by healthcare professionals while prescribing and dispensing generic and biosimilar medications in the MENA region, focusing on their perceptions, knowledge, and attitudes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Cochrane guidelines and the \"Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews,\" a comprehensive search of electronic databases and grey literature was conducted from 2012 to 2024. Studies assessing physicians' and pharmacists' perspectives on generics and biosimilars in the MENA region were included. Quality appraisal was performed using a standardized tool, the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT). The findings were synthesized using a descriptive analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3570 screened citations, 39 met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 25 studies addressed facilitators and barriers to adopting generic medications, whereas 15 focused on biosimilars. Facilitators of generic medications included understanding the use of generics as cost-effective substitutes, supportive government policies, generic medication awareness, and pharmacists' empowerment to substitute medications. Barriers included knowledge gaps leading to distrust in efficacy and safety, the influence of pharmaceutical companies, cultural biases favoring brand name drugs, regulatory challenges, low consumer awareness, and concerns about pharmacists' profitability. Facilitators for biosimilars were mostly similar to generics, with an added emphasis on access benefit recognition when using biosimilars. Unique barriers included concerns about the lack of long-term safety data, hesitancy toward non-medical switching, and nocebo effect concerns. The quality assessment indicated that most studies were of moderate quality, with limitations such as sample size and representativeness, validity of the measurement tools, and potential biases of the researchers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant knowledge gaps regarding regulatory approval, safety, and efficacy hinder the adoption of generic drugs and biosimilars in MENA. Targeted educational initiatives at the regulatory and payer levels are essential for bridging these gaps, enhancing awareness, and fostering acceptance. Implementing comprehensive educational programs for physicians and pharmacists is crucial to support the transition toward the greater use of generics and biosimilars.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-025-03819-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The adoption of generic and biosimilar medications is crucial for improving healthcare accessibility and cost savings in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Understanding the factors that influence their acceptance is crucial for developing effective strategies for promoting their use.

Purpose: This systematic review aimed to examine the facilitators and barriers identified by healthcare professionals while prescribing and dispensing generic and biosimilar medications in the MENA region, focusing on their perceptions, knowledge, and attitudes.

Methods: Following Cochrane guidelines and the "Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews," a comprehensive search of electronic databases and grey literature was conducted from 2012 to 2024. Studies assessing physicians' and pharmacists' perspectives on generics and biosimilars in the MENA region were included. Quality appraisal was performed using a standardized tool, the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT). The findings were synthesized using a descriptive analysis.

Results: Of the 3570 screened citations, 39 met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 25 studies addressed facilitators and barriers to adopting generic medications, whereas 15 focused on biosimilars. Facilitators of generic medications included understanding the use of generics as cost-effective substitutes, supportive government policies, generic medication awareness, and pharmacists' empowerment to substitute medications. Barriers included knowledge gaps leading to distrust in efficacy and safety, the influence of pharmaceutical companies, cultural biases favoring brand name drugs, regulatory challenges, low consumer awareness, and concerns about pharmacists' profitability. Facilitators for biosimilars were mostly similar to generics, with an added emphasis on access benefit recognition when using biosimilars. Unique barriers included concerns about the lack of long-term safety data, hesitancy toward non-medical switching, and nocebo effect concerns. The quality assessment indicated that most studies were of moderate quality, with limitations such as sample size and representativeness, validity of the measurement tools, and potential biases of the researchers.

Conclusion: Significant knowledge gaps regarding regulatory approval, safety, and efficacy hinder the adoption of generic drugs and biosimilars in MENA. Targeted educational initiatives at the regulatory and payer levels are essential for bridging these gaps, enhancing awareness, and fostering acceptance. Implementing comprehensive educational programs for physicians and pharmacists is crucial to support the transition toward the greater use of generics and biosimilars.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology publishes original papers on all aspects of clinical pharmacology and drug therapy in humans. Manuscripts are welcomed on the following topics: therapeutic trials, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics, drug metabolism, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, all aspects of drug development, development relating to teaching in clinical pharmacology, pharmacoepidemiology, and matters relating to the rational prescribing and safe use of drugs. Methodological contributions relevant to these topics are also welcomed. Data from animal experiments are accepted only in the context of original data in man reported in the same paper. EJCP will only consider manuscripts describing the frequency of allelic variants in different populations if this information is linked to functional data or new interesting variants. Highly relevant differences in frequency with a major impact in drug therapy for the respective population may be submitted as a letter to the editor. Straightforward phase I pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic studies as parts of new drug development will only be considered for publication if the paper involves -a compound that is interesting and new in some basic or fundamental way, or -methods that are original in some basic sense, or -a highly unexpected outcome, or -conclusions that are scientifically novel in some basic or fundamental sense.
期刊最新文献
Facilitators and barriers to generic and biosimilar medications in the Middle East and North Africa: insights from physicians and pharmacists-a systematic review. Prescribing patterns of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in the Swedish capital region-a register-based cross-sectional study. A narrative review of the placebo effect: historical roots, current applications, and emerging insights. Era of surrogate endpoints and accelerated approvals: a comprehensive review on applicability, uncertainties, and challenges from regulatory, payer, and patient perspectives. Evaluation of surrogate endpoints in phase III randomized control trials of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1